A study of the efficacy of antipyretic drugs in the prevention of febrile seizure recurrence

Adrianus van Esch, Ewout W Steyerberg, Henriëtte A Moll, Martin Offringa, Arne W Hoes, J Dik F Habbema, Gerdarda Derksen-Lubsen
{"title":"A study of the efficacy of antipyretic drugs in the prevention of febrile seizure recurrence","authors":"Adrianus van Esch,&nbsp;Ewout W Steyerberg,&nbsp;Henriëtte A Moll,&nbsp;Martin Offringa,&nbsp;Arne W Hoes,&nbsp;J Dik F Habbema,&nbsp;Gerdarda Derksen-Lubsen","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00059.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p> <i>Objective</i> To estimate the potential preventive effect of antipyretic drugs on the recurrence of febrile seizures (FS).</p>\n <p> <i>Design</i> An experimental and a descriptive patient series, both prospectively followed, were combined in this study.</p>\n <p> <i>Setting/participants</i> Children who visited the outpatient department of the Sophia Children’s Hospital because of a FS experienced between the age of 10 and 36 months.</p>\n <p> <i>Intervention</i> A treatment group of 109 children was offered treatment with ibuprofen or acetaminophen syrup during fever, a control group of 103 children was not offered antipyretic treatment. This was not a randomized trial. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the risk of any recurrence and the number of recurrences per fever were compared between both groups. In an additional on-treatment analysis, we compared the number of recurrences per fever between the control group and the children in the treatment group who actually received the study medication during fever. Effect measures were odds ratio (OR) as estimated by the Mantel–Haenszel procedure and hazard ratios (HR) as estimated by Cox regression.</p>\n <p> <i>Results</i> According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the hazard ratio of any recurrence in the treatment group compared with the control group was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7–1.8]. The recurrence risk per fever was 15% in the treatment group and 12% in the control group (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7–2.3). In the exploratory on-treatment analysis, the recurrence risk in the treatment group was estimated 6.9% in the treatment group versus 12% in the control group (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2–1.3).</p>\n <p> <i>Conclusions/implications for practice</i> We conclude that antipyretic treatment may have little or no preventive effect on the recurrence of febrile seizures in common practice. Some reduction of the risk of a recurrence may be acquired under optimal circumstances, namely that fever is noticed at once and that antipyretic drugs can be administered on time.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00059.x","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00059.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Objective To estimate the potential preventive effect of antipyretic drugs on the recurrence of febrile seizures (FS).

Design An experimental and a descriptive patient series, both prospectively followed, were combined in this study.

Setting/participants Children who visited the outpatient department of the Sophia Children’s Hospital because of a FS experienced between the age of 10 and 36 months.

Intervention A treatment group of 109 children was offered treatment with ibuprofen or acetaminophen syrup during fever, a control group of 103 children was not offered antipyretic treatment. This was not a randomized trial. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the risk of any recurrence and the number of recurrences per fever were compared between both groups. In an additional on-treatment analysis, we compared the number of recurrences per fever between the control group and the children in the treatment group who actually received the study medication during fever. Effect measures were odds ratio (OR) as estimated by the Mantel–Haenszel procedure and hazard ratios (HR) as estimated by Cox regression.

Results According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the hazard ratio of any recurrence in the treatment group compared with the control group was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7–1.8]. The recurrence risk per fever was 15% in the treatment group and 12% in the control group (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7–2.3). In the exploratory on-treatment analysis, the recurrence risk in the treatment group was estimated 6.9% in the treatment group versus 12% in the control group (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2–1.3).

Conclusions/implications for practice We conclude that antipyretic treatment may have little or no preventive effect on the recurrence of febrile seizures in common practice. Some reduction of the risk of a recurrence may be acquired under optimal circumstances, namely that fever is noticed at once and that antipyretic drugs can be administered on time.

解热药物预防热性惊厥复发的疗效研究
目的探讨退热药物对热性惊厥(FS)复发的潜在预防作用。设计本研究结合了前瞻性随访的实验性和描述性患者系列。背景/参与者在索菲亚儿童医院门诊部就诊的年龄在10至36个月之间的儿童。干预治疗组109例患儿在发热时给予布洛芬或对乙酰氨基酚糖浆治疗,对照组103例患儿不给予退烧药治疗。这不是一个随机试验。在意向治疗分析中,比较两组之间任何复发的风险和每次发烧的复发次数。在另一项治疗分析中,我们比较了对照组和治疗组在发烧期间实际接受研究药物治疗的儿童每次发烧的复发率。效果测量是通过Mantel-Haenszel程序估计的优势比(OR)和Cox回归估计的风险比(HR)。结果意向治疗分析显示,治疗组与对照组相比,任何复发的风险比为1.1[95%可信区间(CI), 0.7 ~ 1.8]。治疗组每次发热的复发风险为15%,对照组为12% (OR, 1.2;95% ci, 0.7-2.3)。在探索性治疗分析中,治疗组的复发风险估计为6.9%,而对照组为12% (OR, 0.5;95% ci, 0.2-1.3)。结论/实践意义我们的结论是,在常见的实践中,退热治疗对热性惊厥的复发可能只有很少或没有预防作用。在最佳情况下,即立即发现发热,及时给予退烧药,可使复发的危险有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信