Communication techniques. A case study: negotiation in a bank

Sorina Dîrjan, Sebastian Călin Vac
{"title":"Communication techniques. A case study: negotiation in a bank","authors":"Sorina Dîrjan, Sebastian Călin Vac","doi":"10.15835/BUASVMCN-AGR:12022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a case report, which analyzes in terms of quality the negotiation process from two particular standpoints: the banking and project management areas. Although the domain of the legal persons credits analysis, and that developing project management are relatively similar, since both treat the analysis, development and implementation of projects for business, yet each of these fields has their own peculiarities, determined primarily by the fact that: while, as a credit analyst, you are the bank ”consultant” (you represent the financing party) and you promote its interests, as a project manager you are the the customer’s ”consultant” (meaning the legal entity beneficiary of funding). Therefore, although the areas of activity are related, the manner of reporting differs systematically: top-bottom or bottom-up. The research methods are based on the analysis of the instances encountered in practice, the study taking into account over two hundred credit analysis and over thirty written and/or implemented projects. Our study shows that depending on which side of the negotiating table the subject is located (the positions of the financier or financed), then the practice of projects implementing (in both cases) demonstrates that all the situations presented are real, possible, often encountered and the best tactics in solving them is prevention, avoiding to reach sensitive situations, completed by a professional, honest and cooperative attitude maintained throughout the entire project implementation.","PeriodicalId":9380,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca","volume":"22 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15835/BUASVMCN-AGR:12022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a case report, which analyzes in terms of quality the negotiation process from two particular standpoints: the banking and project management areas. Although the domain of the legal persons credits analysis, and that developing project management are relatively similar, since both treat the analysis, development and implementation of projects for business, yet each of these fields has their own peculiarities, determined primarily by the fact that: while, as a credit analyst, you are the bank ”consultant” (you represent the financing party) and you promote its interests, as a project manager you are the the customer’s ”consultant” (meaning the legal entity beneficiary of funding). Therefore, although the areas of activity are related, the manner of reporting differs systematically: top-bottom or bottom-up. The research methods are based on the analysis of the instances encountered in practice, the study taking into account over two hundred credit analysis and over thirty written and/or implemented projects. Our study shows that depending on which side of the negotiating table the subject is located (the positions of the financier or financed), then the practice of projects implementing (in both cases) demonstrates that all the situations presented are real, possible, often encountered and the best tactics in solving them is prevention, avoiding to reach sensitive situations, completed by a professional, honest and cooperative attitude maintained throughout the entire project implementation.
通信技术。一个案例研究:银行谈判
本文是一个案例报告,从银行和项目管理两个特定的角度分析了谈判过程的质量。虽然法人信用分析的领域与开发项目管理的领域相对相似,因为两者都将项目的分析、开发和实施用于商业,但这些领域都有自己的特点,主要是由以下事实决定的:作为信用分析师,您是银行的“顾问”(您代表融资方)并促进其利益,而作为项目经理,您是客户的“顾问”(即资金的法律实体受益人)。因此,尽管活动领域是相关的,但报告的方式系统地不同:自上而下或自下而上。研究方法基于对实践中遇到的实例的分析,该研究考虑了200多个信用分析和30多个书面和/或实施的项目。我们的研究表明,根据谈判桌上的哪一方(融资方或被融资方的立场),项目实施的实践(在两种情况下)表明,所有出现的情况都是真实的、可能的、经常遇到的,解决这些情况的最佳策略是预防,避免达到敏感的情况,在整个项目实施过程中保持专业、诚实和合作的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信