Dante, Berlusconi, and the Bordello State: Paolo Sylos Labini’s and James Walston’s Democratic Dante at the Ebb of the Seconda Repubblica

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Nicolino Applauso
{"title":"Dante, Berlusconi, and the Bordello State: Paolo Sylos Labini’s and James Walston’s Democratic Dante at the Ebb of the Seconda Repubblica","authors":"Nicolino Applauso","doi":"10.1353/MDI.2017.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dante’s memorable invective in Purgatorio 6 has consistently been politicized, especially during the Risorgimento. Vittorio Alfieri, Ugo Foscolo, and Giuseppe Mazzini used the invective while promoting a revolutionary and patriotic Dante. Modern scholars such as Edoardo Sanguineti and Lino Pertile have refuted this political interpretation by classifying Dante and his works as reactionary, antibourgeois, and antidemocratic. However, the question is far from settled, especially if we consider how Purgatorio 6 has acquired great exposure in recent years through new media with wide circulation, such as pamphlets and magazine articles. In this study, I shall examine Paolo Sylos Labini’s Ahi serva Italia: Un appello ai miei concittadini (Servile Italy: An Appeal to My Fellow Citizens) (2006) and James Walston’s “The Bordello State: Italy’s Descent under Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi” (2010). Both authors advance their criticism against Berlusconi’s government by using Dante’s invective as their starting point. By doing so, they propagate a “democratic Dante,” reach a worldwide audience, and thus introduce a new political model that differs from both the revolutionary and the reactionary interpretations. While exploring Labini’s and Walston’s works, I will also juxtapose the dynamic exchange that occurred between Walston and one of his most outspoken detractors, the Italian diplomat Giulio Terzi. Finally, I shall assess these political expropriations and appropriations by proposing my own conclusion. Even though Labini and Walston successfully revived the Commedia in contemporary political debates by stirring readers’ response to divisive issues pertaining to Italy’s Seconda Repubblica, they also advance the idea of Dante as the champion of democracy.","PeriodicalId":36685,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Mediaevalia","volume":"22 1","pages":"249 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MDI.2017.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dante’s memorable invective in Purgatorio 6 has consistently been politicized, especially during the Risorgimento. Vittorio Alfieri, Ugo Foscolo, and Giuseppe Mazzini used the invective while promoting a revolutionary and patriotic Dante. Modern scholars such as Edoardo Sanguineti and Lino Pertile have refuted this political interpretation by classifying Dante and his works as reactionary, antibourgeois, and antidemocratic. However, the question is far from settled, especially if we consider how Purgatorio 6 has acquired great exposure in recent years through new media with wide circulation, such as pamphlets and magazine articles. In this study, I shall examine Paolo Sylos Labini’s Ahi serva Italia: Un appello ai miei concittadini (Servile Italy: An Appeal to My Fellow Citizens) (2006) and James Walston’s “The Bordello State: Italy’s Descent under Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi” (2010). Both authors advance their criticism against Berlusconi’s government by using Dante’s invective as their starting point. By doing so, they propagate a “democratic Dante,” reach a worldwide audience, and thus introduce a new political model that differs from both the revolutionary and the reactionary interpretations. While exploring Labini’s and Walston’s works, I will also juxtapose the dynamic exchange that occurred between Walston and one of his most outspoken detractors, the Italian diplomat Giulio Terzi. Finally, I shall assess these political expropriations and appropriations by proposing my own conclusion. Even though Labini and Walston successfully revived the Commedia in contemporary political debates by stirring readers’ response to divisive issues pertaining to Italy’s Seconda Repubblica, they also advance the idea of Dante as the champion of democracy.
但丁、贝卢斯科尼和妓院之国:保罗·西洛斯·拉比尼和詹姆斯·沃尔斯顿的《第二共和国衰退期的民主党但丁》
但丁在炼狱篇第6章中令人难忘的谩骂一直被政治化,尤其是在复兴运动期间。维托里奥·阿尔菲利、乌戈·福斯科洛和朱塞佩·马志尼在宣传革命和爱国的但丁时使用了这种谩骂。现代学者如Edoardo Sanguineti和Lino Pertile驳斥了这种政治解释,他们将但丁和他的作品归类为反动的、反资产阶级的和反民主的。然而,这个问题还远远没有解决,特别是如果我们考虑到近年来炼狱6是如何通过小册子和杂志文章等发行量很大的新媒体获得了很大的曝光。在本研究中,我将考察保罗·西洛斯·拉比尼的《卑屈的意大利:对同胞的呼吁》(2006)和詹姆斯·沃尔斯顿的《妓院之国:贝卢斯科尼总理治下的意大利后裔》(2010)。两位作者都以但丁的谩骂为出发点来推进他们对贝卢斯科尼政府的批评。通过这样做,他们宣传了一个“民主的但丁”,达到了全世界的受众,从而引入了一种不同于革命和反动解释的新的政治模式。在探索拉比尼和沃尔斯顿的作品时,我还将把沃尔斯顿与他最直言不讳的批评者之一、意大利外交官朱利奥·特齐(Giulio Terzi)之间的动态交流并列起来。最后,我将通过提出我自己的结论来评估这些政治征用和挪用。尽管拉比尼和沃尔斯顿通过激起读者对与意大利第二共和国有关的分裂问题的反应,成功地在当代政治辩论中复兴了喜剧,但他们也推进了但丁作为民主斗士的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scripta Mediaevalia
Scripta Mediaevalia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信