Impacto de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa en la reclasificación histológica y tratamiento de displasia en esófago de Barrett

Francisco Daniel Briseño-García, Sergio Zepeda-Gómez, Ambrosio Rafael Bernal-Méndez, R. Barreto-Zúñiga
{"title":"Impacto de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa en la reclasificación histológica y tratamiento de displasia en esófago de Barrett","authors":"Francisco Daniel Briseño-García, Sergio Zepeda-Gómez, Ambrosio Rafael Bernal-Méndez, R. Barreto-Zúñiga","doi":"10.26723/endoscopia.0188-9893.173.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and aims. In selected patients, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Currently, there is few available information regarding the reclassification of histological diagnosis in BE associated focal lesions. The aim was to evaluate the reclassification of histological diagnosis post-EMR, in patients with BE with biopsy proven dysplasia. \nMaterial and methods. This is a retrospective and descriptive study. We included patients with BE from January 2002-december 2013, in whom EMR was performed and had a previous biopsy with either low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC).EMR was performed by either the cap technique or by using the multi-band ligator technique. \nResults. We analyzed 41 specimens obtained in 19 EMR procedures performed in 11 patients. When pre and post-EMR diagnosis were evaluated, there was a reclassification in histological diagnosis in 7 of 11 (63%) patients (downstaging occurred in 5 and upstaging occurred in 2 patients). The global follow-up time was 45 (3-95) months. Nine patients (81.8%) received endoscopic eradication therapy without recurrence in the follow up. There were no procedure related complications. \nConclusions. EMR conditions a significant change in histological diagnosis in BE with dysplasia patients.","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 1","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26723/endoscopia.0188-9893.173.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and aims. In selected patients, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Currently, there is few available information regarding the reclassification of histological diagnosis in BE associated focal lesions. The aim was to evaluate the reclassification of histological diagnosis post-EMR, in patients with BE with biopsy proven dysplasia. Material and methods. This is a retrospective and descriptive study. We included patients with BE from January 2002-december 2013, in whom EMR was performed and had a previous biopsy with either low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC).EMR was performed by either the cap technique or by using the multi-band ligator technique. Results. We analyzed 41 specimens obtained in 19 EMR procedures performed in 11 patients. When pre and post-EMR diagnosis were evaluated, there was a reclassification in histological diagnosis in 7 of 11 (63%) patients (downstaging occurred in 5 and upstaging occurred in 2 patients). The global follow-up time was 45 (3-95) months. Nine patients (81.8%) received endoscopic eradication therapy without recurrence in the follow up. There were no procedure related complications. Conclusions. EMR conditions a significant change in histological diagnosis in BE with dysplasia patients.
内镜下粘膜切除对巴雷特食管发育不良组织学重新分类和治疗的影响
介绍和目的。在特定的患者中,内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)是诊断和治疗巴雷特食管(BE)的一种有价值的工具。目前,关于BE相关局灶性病变的组织学诊断重新分类的可用信息很少。目的是评估经活检证实为不典型增生的BE患者emr后组织学诊断的重新分类。材料和方法。这是一项回顾性和描述性研究。我们纳入了2002年1月至2013年12月的BE患者,这些患者进行了EMR,既往活检为低级别发育不良(LGD)、高级别发育不良(HGD)或粘膜内癌(IMC)。EMR采用帽式技术或多波段结扎器技术。结果。我们分析了11例患者19例EMR手术中获得的41例标本。当评估emr前后诊断时,11例患者中有7例(63%)的组织学诊断出现重新分类(5例降期,2例升期)。全球随访时间为45(3 ~ 95)个月。9例(81.8%)患者接受内镜根除治疗,随访无复发。无手术相关并发症。结论。EMR条件的组织学诊断显着改变与异常增生的BE患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信