A Need of New Farm Acts: Case Study of Sangamner Block

Gulab Dhaware
{"title":"A Need of New Farm Acts: Case Study of Sangamner Block","authors":"Gulab Dhaware","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India has been facing severe agrarian crisis. The crisis becomes darker since the inception of the New Economic Policy in 1991. Agrarian crisis has several facets and volatile agriculture market is one of them. India has wide network of regulated agricultural markets named as APMCs and farmers rely on these markets as a site of procurement. Recently government of India passed New Farm Acts in the visage of ordinance but farmers have been painstakingly opposing these Acts, farmers believe that these acts are corporate leaned and will rule out both MSPs and APMC markets. The evidences too confirmed that farmers have been opting APMC markets as site of procurement over private traders since these markets are regulatory whereas private traders or private markets have potential to deceive the farmer! Farmers are aware about on-going protest at various borders of Delhi about New Farm Acts. Despite farmers haven’t been getting promised MSP at APMC markets, farmers still advocating APMC markets since it guarantees the payment. Majority of the farmers asserted that they are not going to favour these acts since it won’t be beneficial for them and also rule out the promised MSP. There should be healthy competition between APMC markets and Private markets, unlike APMCs private markets should be regulated by the government.  ","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India has been facing severe agrarian crisis. The crisis becomes darker since the inception of the New Economic Policy in 1991. Agrarian crisis has several facets and volatile agriculture market is one of them. India has wide network of regulated agricultural markets named as APMCs and farmers rely on these markets as a site of procurement. Recently government of India passed New Farm Acts in the visage of ordinance but farmers have been painstakingly opposing these Acts, farmers believe that these acts are corporate leaned and will rule out both MSPs and APMC markets. The evidences too confirmed that farmers have been opting APMC markets as site of procurement over private traders since these markets are regulatory whereas private traders or private markets have potential to deceive the farmer! Farmers are aware about on-going protest at various borders of Delhi about New Farm Acts. Despite farmers haven’t been getting promised MSP at APMC markets, farmers still advocating APMC markets since it guarantees the payment. Majority of the farmers asserted that they are not going to favour these acts since it won’t be beneficial for them and also rule out the promised MSP. There should be healthy competition between APMC markets and Private markets, unlike APMCs private markets should be regulated by the government.  
新农业法案的必要性:以Sangamner街区为例
印度一直面临着严重的农业危机。自1991年实行新经济政策以来,危机愈演愈烈。农业危机有几个方面,动荡的农业市场是其中之一。印度拥有广泛的受监管的农业市场网络,这些市场被称为apmc,农民依赖这些市场作为采购地点。最近,印度政府以法令的形式通过了新农业法案,但农民一直在努力反对这些法案,农民认为这些法案是企业倾向的,将排除msp和APMC市场。证据也证实,农民选择APMC市场作为采购地点,而不是私人贸易商,因为这些市场是监管的,而私人贸易商或私人市场有可能欺骗农民!农民们意识到,在德里的各个边境,针对新农业法案的抗议正在进行。尽管农民没有在APMC市场得到承诺的MSP,但农民仍然支持APMC市场,因为它保证了支付。大多数农民声称,他们不会支持这些法案,因为这对他们没有好处,也排除了承诺的邦sp。APMC市场和私人市场之间应该有健康的竞争,与APMC不同,私人市场应该由政府监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信