On Learning and Co-learning Effective Strategies in Iterated Travelers' Dilemma

Predrag T. Tosic
{"title":"On Learning and Co-learning Effective Strategies in Iterated Travelers' Dilemma","authors":"Predrag T. Tosic","doi":"10.1109/WI.2016.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this short paper, we summarize our previous results, and share some new insights, ideas and challenges about what types of adaptable strategies generally tend to get rewarded in Iterated Travelers' Dilemma (ITD). Our primary motivation for studying ITD is that this strategic 2-person game provides implicit incentives for cooperation – but only if both players cooperate. ITD is a non-zero-sum two-player game that generalizes the better known Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD). Both IPD and ITD can be viewed as repeated exchanges of proposals or bids, where the payoff to each agent at the end of a round is based on i) how close were the two agents' bids to each other and ii) who bid lower in that round. Our broader goal is to understand how a resource-bounded rational agent can learn about the behavior of other self-interested agents, in order to adjust his or her own bidding strategy in a manner that is most likely to be rewarding in the long run. In addition to exploring traditional reinforcement learning mechanisms in this setting, we also initiate studying the potential promise of co-learning between pairs of adaptive, self-interested but non-malicious agents with bounded computational resources.","PeriodicalId":6513,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"51 1","pages":"674-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2016.0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this short paper, we summarize our previous results, and share some new insights, ideas and challenges about what types of adaptable strategies generally tend to get rewarded in Iterated Travelers' Dilemma (ITD). Our primary motivation for studying ITD is that this strategic 2-person game provides implicit incentives for cooperation – but only if both players cooperate. ITD is a non-zero-sum two-player game that generalizes the better known Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD). Both IPD and ITD can be viewed as repeated exchanges of proposals or bids, where the payoff to each agent at the end of a round is based on i) how close were the two agents' bids to each other and ii) who bid lower in that round. Our broader goal is to understand how a resource-bounded rational agent can learn about the behavior of other self-interested agents, in order to adjust his or her own bidding strategy in a manner that is most likely to be rewarding in the long run. In addition to exploring traditional reinforcement learning mechanisms in this setting, we also initiate studying the potential promise of co-learning between pairs of adaptive, self-interested but non-malicious agents with bounded computational resources.
迭代旅行者困境中的学习与共同学习有效策略研究
在这篇短文中,我们总结了之前的研究结果,并分享了一些关于在迭代旅行者困境(ITD)中哪种类型的适应性策略通常更容易获得回报的新见解、想法和挑战。我们研究ITD的主要动机是,这种2人战略博弈为合作提供了隐性激励——但前提是双方都合作。ITD是一种非零和的双人游戏,它推广了广为人知的迭代囚徒困境(IPD)。IPD和ITD都可以被看作是提议或出价的重复交换,其中每个代理在一轮结束时的收益取决于i)两个代理的出价彼此之间的接近程度以及ii)在该轮中谁的出价更低。我们更广泛的目标是理解资源有限的理性主体如何学习其他自利主体的行为,以便以一种最有可能在长期内获得回报的方式调整他或她自己的投标策略。除了在这种情况下探索传统的强化学习机制外,我们还开始研究具有有限计算资源的自适应、自利但非恶意代理对之间共同学习的潜在前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信