Revisiting the Role of Amniotic Membrane Dressing in Acute Large Traumatic Wounds: A Randomized Feasibility Study at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-04 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_17_23
Narendra Choudhary, Abhinav Kumar, Pratyusha Priyadarshini, Dinesh Bagaria, Junaid Alam, Kapil Dev Soni, Vivek Kumar, Sushma Sagar, Amit Gupta, Subodh Kumar, Sujata Mohanty
{"title":"Revisiting the Role of Amniotic Membrane Dressing in Acute Large Traumatic Wounds: A Randomized Feasibility Study at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.","authors":"Narendra Choudhary, Abhinav Kumar, Pratyusha Priyadarshini, Dinesh Bagaria, Junaid Alam, Kapil Dev Soni, Vivek Kumar, Sushma Sagar, Amit Gupta, Subodh Kumar, Sujata Mohanty","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_17_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute large traumatic wounds require temporary dressing prior to the definitive soft tissue reconstruction, as the physiological derangement during the immediate postinjury period delays the definitive surgical intervention. Selecting an ideal dressing material from numerous available synthetic dressings and skin substitutes poses a challenge. Although amniotic membrane (AM) scaffold has a definitive role in promoting wound healing in burns and chronic wounds, however, its efficacy in acute large traumatic wound is lacking. The present trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AM in wound bed preparation before the definitive soft-tissue reconstruction in acute large traumatic wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients with acute large traumatic wounds (>10 cm × 10 cm) were divided into two groups (conventional dressing and AM dressing) using simple mixed block randomization. Wounds were assessed using the Bates Jensen Score at various timelines for the signs of early wound healing. The primary outcome was to evaluate the time taken for the wound bed preparation for definitive soft-tissue reconstruction. The secondary outcome was the pain assessment and complications, if any.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant reduction in the wound exudate as well as peripheral tissue edema in the intervention group (<i>P</i> = 0.01). AM dressing was significantly less painful (<i>P</i> = 0.01). The incidence of wound infection and need for debridement was decreased in the intervention group. However, the time interval to definitive soft-tissue coverage was statistically insignificant and comparable in both the groups. No adverse reactions were seen in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AM dressings are safe and efficacious with significant reduction in wound exudates and peripheral edema. However, these dressings do not hasten the wound maturation as compared to conventional dressings. AM dressings can be used as a less painful alternative to conventional dressing in the management of large acute posttraumatic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_17_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute large traumatic wounds require temporary dressing prior to the definitive soft tissue reconstruction, as the physiological derangement during the immediate postinjury period delays the definitive surgical intervention. Selecting an ideal dressing material from numerous available synthetic dressings and skin substitutes poses a challenge. Although amniotic membrane (AM) scaffold has a definitive role in promoting wound healing in burns and chronic wounds, however, its efficacy in acute large traumatic wound is lacking. The present trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AM in wound bed preparation before the definitive soft-tissue reconstruction in acute large traumatic wounds.

Methods: Sixty patients with acute large traumatic wounds (>10 cm × 10 cm) were divided into two groups (conventional dressing and AM dressing) using simple mixed block randomization. Wounds were assessed using the Bates Jensen Score at various timelines for the signs of early wound healing. The primary outcome was to evaluate the time taken for the wound bed preparation for definitive soft-tissue reconstruction. The secondary outcome was the pain assessment and complications, if any.

Results: There was significant reduction in the wound exudate as well as peripheral tissue edema in the intervention group (P = 0.01). AM dressing was significantly less painful (P = 0.01). The incidence of wound infection and need for debridement was decreased in the intervention group. However, the time interval to definitive soft-tissue coverage was statistically insignificant and comparable in both the groups. No adverse reactions were seen in either group.

Conclusion: AM dressings are safe and efficacious with significant reduction in wound exudates and peripheral edema. However, these dressings do not hasten the wound maturation as compared to conventional dressings. AM dressings can be used as a less painful alternative to conventional dressing in the management of large acute posttraumatic wounds.

重新审视羊膜敷料在急性大创伤中的作用:1级创伤中心的随机可行性研究。
简介:急性创伤性大伤口需要临时敷料之前,最终的软组织重建,因为生理紊乱在损伤后的一段时间内延迟最终的手术干预。从众多可用的合成敷料和皮肤替代品中选择理想的敷料材料是一项挑战。虽然羊膜支架在促进烧伤和慢性创伤创面愈合方面具有明确的作用,但其在急性创伤大创面的疗效尚缺乏。本试验旨在评价AM在急性大创伤软组织重建前的伤口床准备中的安全性和有效性。方法:采用简单混合分组随机法,将60例>10 cm × 10 cm的急性大面积创伤患者分为常规敷料组和AM敷料组。使用Bates Jensen评分在不同时间线评估伤口早期愈合的迹象。主要结果是评估最终软组织重建所需的伤口床准备时间。次要结果是疼痛评估和并发症(如果有的话)。结果:干预组创面渗出液及周围组织水肿明显减少(P = 0.01)。AM敷料明显减轻疼痛(P = 0.01)。干预组的伤口感染发生率和清创需求均有所降低。然而,确定软组织覆盖的时间间隔在两组中具有统计学意义和可比性。两组均未见不良反应。结论:AM敷料安全有效,可显著减少创面渗出液和周围水肿。然而,与传统敷料相比,这些敷料不会加速伤口成熟。AM敷料可以作为一个更少痛苦的替代传统敷料在管理大急性创伤后伤口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信