The Effect of Supportive Educational Intervention on Perceived Stress and Severity of Chemotherapy-Related Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Patients

Neda Arbabi, Mohammad Kazem Momeni, Pegah Sasanpour, F. Kiani
{"title":"The Effect of Supportive Educational Intervention on Perceived Stress and Severity of Chemotherapy-Related Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Patients","authors":"Neda Arbabi, Mohammad Kazem Momeni, Pegah Sasanpour, F. Kiani","doi":"10.5812/msnj.122432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The nature of breast cancer (BC) and its treatment is such that it leads to physical and psychological complications. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the effect of supportive educational intervention on the perceived stress and severity of chemotherapy-related neuropathy in BC patients. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was carried out on 60 women suffering from BC in Zahedan, Iran, in 2020. The patients were selected using the convenience sampling method and randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. The patients in the intervention group received four 45-minute sessions about the common problems of BC on a weekly and individual basis. The control group received only routine ward care. Data collection tools were the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Cohen and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale. Data were collected before the intervention and six weeks after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22 software. Results: The results of independent t-test showed that the mean and standard deviation of perceived stress score in the intervention group decreased from 56.8 ± 5.92 to 50.36 ± 3.89 (P < 0.001), and in the control group decreased from 55.6 ± 3.65 to 54.8 ± 3.53 (P = 0.258). The mean and standard deviation of neuropathy severity score in the intervention group decreased from 12.90 ± 1.66 to 8.43 ± 2.16 (P < 0.001), and in the control group increased from 12.56 ± 2.28 to 13.03 ± 1.93 (P = 0.276). The independent t-test showed that after implementing the supportive educational intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean and standard deviation of neuropathy severity score (P < 0.001). Conclusions: According to our results, supportive educational intervention reduced the perceived stress and severity of neuropathy. Thus, it is necessary to include these supportive interventions in educational and care programs to improve patients’ psychological status and reduce stress and neuropathy.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.122432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The nature of breast cancer (BC) and its treatment is such that it leads to physical and psychological complications. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the effect of supportive educational intervention on the perceived stress and severity of chemotherapy-related neuropathy in BC patients. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was carried out on 60 women suffering from BC in Zahedan, Iran, in 2020. The patients were selected using the convenience sampling method and randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. The patients in the intervention group received four 45-minute sessions about the common problems of BC on a weekly and individual basis. The control group received only routine ward care. Data collection tools were the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Cohen and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale. Data were collected before the intervention and six weeks after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22 software. Results: The results of independent t-test showed that the mean and standard deviation of perceived stress score in the intervention group decreased from 56.8 ± 5.92 to 50.36 ± 3.89 (P < 0.001), and in the control group decreased from 55.6 ± 3.65 to 54.8 ± 3.53 (P = 0.258). The mean and standard deviation of neuropathy severity score in the intervention group decreased from 12.90 ± 1.66 to 8.43 ± 2.16 (P < 0.001), and in the control group increased from 12.56 ± 2.28 to 13.03 ± 1.93 (P = 0.276). The independent t-test showed that after implementing the supportive educational intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean and standard deviation of neuropathy severity score (P < 0.001). Conclusions: According to our results, supportive educational intervention reduced the perceived stress and severity of neuropathy. Thus, it is necessary to include these supportive interventions in educational and care programs to improve patients’ psychological status and reduce stress and neuropathy.
支持教育干预对乳腺癌化疗相关神经病变患者应激感知及严重程度的影响
背景:乳腺癌(BC)的性质及其治疗是这样的,它会导致身体和心理并发症。目的:本研究旨在确定支持教育干预对BC患者化疗相关神经病变感知压力和严重程度的影响。方法:对2020年伊朗扎黑丹60名BC患者进行准实验研究。采用方便抽样法将患者随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组的患者每周和个人接受4次45分钟的关于BC常见问题的会议。对照组患者仅接受常规病房护理。数据收集工具是由Cohen和Leeds开发的感知压力量表(PSS)神经性症状和体征评估(LANSS)疼痛量表。数据收集于干预前和干预后6周。数据分析采用SPSS 22软件。结果:独立t检验结果显示,干预组感知应激评分均值和标准差由56.8±5.92降至50.36±3.89 (P < 0.001),对照组由55.6±3.65降至54.8±3.53 (P = 0.258)。干预组神经病变严重程度评分均值和标准差由12.90±1.66降至8.43±2.16 (P < 0.001),对照组由12.56±2.28上升至13.03±1.93 (P = 0.276)。独立t检验显示,实施支持性教育干预后,两组患者神经病变严重程度评分的均值和标准差差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:根据我们的研究结果,支持性教育干预降低了感知压力和神经病变的严重程度。因此,有必要在教育和护理计划中纳入这些支持性干预措施,以改善患者的心理状态,减少压力和神经病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信