The CARE Theory of Dignity Amid Personal Data Digitalization

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2021-01-15 DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2021/15941
D. Leidner, Olgerta Tona
{"title":"The CARE Theory of Dignity Amid Personal Data Digitalization","authors":"D. Leidner, Olgerta Tona","doi":"10.25300/MISQ/2021/15941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapidly evolving permeation of digital technologies into everyday human life, we are witnessing an era of personal data digitalization. Personal data digitalization refers to the sociotechnical encounters associated with the digitization of personal data for use in digital technologies. Personal data digitalization is being applied to central attributes of human life—health, cognition, and emotion—with the purported aim of helping individuals live longer, healthier lives endowed with the requisite cognition and emotion for responding to life situations and other people in a manner that enables human flourishing. A concern taking hold in manifold fields ranging from IT, bioethics, and law, to philosophy and religion is that as personal data digitalization permeates ever more areas of human existence, humans risk becoming artifacts of technology production. This concern brings to center stage the very notion of what it means to be human, a notion encapsulated in the term human dignity, which broadly refers to the recognition that human beings possess intrinsic value and, as such, are endowed with certain rights and should be treated with respect. In this paper, we identify, describe, and transform what we know about personal data digitalization into a higher order theoretical structure around the concept of human dignity. The result of our analysis is the CARE (claims, affronts, response, equilibrium) theory of dignity amid personal data digitalization, a theory that explains the relationship of personal data digitalization to human dignity. Building upon the CARE theory as a foundation, researchers in a variety of IS research streams could develop mid-range theories for empirical testing or could use the CARE theory as an overarching lens for interpreting emerging IS phenomena. Practitioners and government agencies can also use the CARE theory to understand the opportunities and risks of personal data digitalization and to develop policies and systems that respect the dignity of employees and citizens.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

With the rapidly evolving permeation of digital technologies into everyday human life, we are witnessing an era of personal data digitalization. Personal data digitalization refers to the sociotechnical encounters associated with the digitization of personal data for use in digital technologies. Personal data digitalization is being applied to central attributes of human life—health, cognition, and emotion—with the purported aim of helping individuals live longer, healthier lives endowed with the requisite cognition and emotion for responding to life situations and other people in a manner that enables human flourishing. A concern taking hold in manifold fields ranging from IT, bioethics, and law, to philosophy and religion is that as personal data digitalization permeates ever more areas of human existence, humans risk becoming artifacts of technology production. This concern brings to center stage the very notion of what it means to be human, a notion encapsulated in the term human dignity, which broadly refers to the recognition that human beings possess intrinsic value and, as such, are endowed with certain rights and should be treated with respect. In this paper, we identify, describe, and transform what we know about personal data digitalization into a higher order theoretical structure around the concept of human dignity. The result of our analysis is the CARE (claims, affronts, response, equilibrium) theory of dignity amid personal data digitalization, a theory that explains the relationship of personal data digitalization to human dignity. Building upon the CARE theory as a foundation, researchers in a variety of IS research streams could develop mid-range theories for empirical testing or could use the CARE theory as an overarching lens for interpreting emerging IS phenomena. Practitioners and government agencies can also use the CARE theory to understand the opportunities and risks of personal data digitalization and to develop policies and systems that respect the dignity of employees and citizens.
个人数据数字化中的尊严关怀理论
随着数字技术迅速渗透到人们的日常生活中,我们正在见证一个个人数据数字化的时代。个人数据数字化是指与数字技术中使用的个人数据数字化相关的社会技术遭遇。个人数据数字化正被应用于人类生命的核心属性——健康、认知和情感——据称目的是帮助个人活得更长、更健康,并赋予必要的认知和情感,以一种使人类繁荣的方式应对生活状况和其他人。从信息技术、生物伦理、法律到哲学和宗教,许多领域都存在这样一种担忧:随着个人数据数字化渗透到人类生活的越来越多的领域,人类有可能成为技术生产的人工制品。这种关切使人的意义这一概念成为人们关注的焦点,这一概念包含在“人的尊严”一词中,它广义地指承认人具有内在价值,因此被赋予某些权利,并应受到尊重。在本文中,我们识别、描述并将我们对个人数据数字化的了解转化为围绕人类尊严概念的更高阶理论结构。我们的分析结果是个人数据数字化中的尊严的CARE (claims, affronts, response, equilibrium)理论,这一理论解释了个人数据数字化与人类尊严的关系。以CARE理论为基础,各种IS研究流的研究人员可以开发用于实证检验的中等理论,或者可以使用CARE理论作为解释新兴IS现象的总体视角。从业人员和政府机构也可以使用CARE理论来了解个人数据数字化的机遇和风险,并制定尊重员工和公民尊严的政策和制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信