Adjudicative subsidiarity, the "horizontality simpliciter" approach and personality rights: Outlining an integrated and constitutional reading strategy to the law of personality

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
C. Visser
{"title":"Adjudicative subsidiarity, the \"horizontality simpliciter\" approach and personality rights: Outlining an integrated and constitutional reading strategy to the law of personality","authors":"C. Visser","doi":"10.17159/2225.7160/2022/v55a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that an integrated and constitutional approach to the law of personality is required, as multiple sources of law are applicable to the conception and adjudication of personality rights and these sources must give effect to constitutional imperatives related to the human personality. This article further argues that such an integrated and constitutional approach ought to be premised on the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity and the \"horizontality simpliciter\" approach (as constitutional reading strategies). Each of these strategies functions at different levels in the law of personality and provides a particular method of integrating legal sources, constitutional values, and fundamental rights to private relationships. At the macro level, denoting the interaction between various sources of law, the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity is aimed at identifying and prioritising sources of law to adjudicate a dispute between private individuals. At the micro level, denoting the application of a legal source between individuals in a private relationship, the horizontality simpliciter approach facilitates the application of both constitutional values and fundamental rights to such a source through its \"values.based\" and \"rights.based\" analyses. This article argues ultimately that the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity and the horizontality simpliciter approach are complementary in nature in the sense that both these reading strategies locate a cause of action in a non.constitutional source that is constitutionally developed through the application of constitutional values and fundamental rights. This complementariness is expressed in the positive law as follows: the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity determines which source of law is applicable to the adjudication of a particular personality right infringement whereas the horizontality simpliciter guides the development of the applicable source against constitutional values and fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2225.7160/2022/v55a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that an integrated and constitutional approach to the law of personality is required, as multiple sources of law are applicable to the conception and adjudication of personality rights and these sources must give effect to constitutional imperatives related to the human personality. This article further argues that such an integrated and constitutional approach ought to be premised on the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity and the "horizontality simpliciter" approach (as constitutional reading strategies). Each of these strategies functions at different levels in the law of personality and provides a particular method of integrating legal sources, constitutional values, and fundamental rights to private relationships. At the macro level, denoting the interaction between various sources of law, the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity is aimed at identifying and prioritising sources of law to adjudicate a dispute between private individuals. At the micro level, denoting the application of a legal source between individuals in a private relationship, the horizontality simpliciter approach facilitates the application of both constitutional values and fundamental rights to such a source through its "values.based" and "rights.based" analyses. This article argues ultimately that the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity and the horizontality simpliciter approach are complementary in nature in the sense that both these reading strategies locate a cause of action in a non.constitutional source that is constitutionally developed through the application of constitutional values and fundamental rights. This complementariness is expressed in the positive law as follows: the principle of adjudicative subsidiarity determines which source of law is applicable to the adjudication of a particular personality right infringement whereas the horizontality simpliciter guides the development of the applicable source against constitutional values and fundamental rights.
裁判辅助性、“横向简化”方法与人格权:人格法的综合宪法解读策略概述
本文认为,人格权的概念和裁定适用多种法律渊源,这些法律渊源必须使与人格有关的宪法规定生效,因此需要对人格法采取一种完整的宪法性途径。本文进一步认为,这种综合的、合宪性的方法应该以裁判辅助原则和“横向简化”方法(作为宪法阅读策略)为前提。每一种策略都在人格法的不同层面上发挥作用,并为整合法律渊源、宪法价值和私人关系的基本权利提供了一种特殊方法。在宏观层面上,裁判辅助性原则指的是各种法律渊源之间的相互作用,其目的是确定和优先处理私人之间的纠纷的法律渊源。在微观层面上,表示在私人关系中的个人之间适用法律来源,横向简化方法通过其“价值”促进了宪法价值和基本权利对这种来源的适用。基于“和”的权利。基于“分析。本文最终认为,裁决辅助性原则和横向简化方法在本质上是互补的,因为这两种阅读策略都将诉因定位在非诉因中。通过运用宪法价值和基本权利而在宪法上发展起来的宪法渊源。这种互补性在成文法中表现为:裁判辅助性原则决定了哪一种法律渊源适用于特定人格权侵权案件的裁决,而横向性原则则指导了适用渊源与宪法价值和基本权利的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信