Clinical Manifestation of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Classified by Age and Gender

B. Taghipour, E. Froelicher, A. Goudarzian, Y. Chan, H. Nia, Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh, A. Haghdoost
{"title":"Clinical Manifestation of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Classified by Age and Gender","authors":"B. Taghipour, E. Froelicher, A. Goudarzian, Y. Chan, H. Nia, Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh, A. Haghdoost","doi":"10.5812/ccn.68676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate clinical manifestations of acute myocardial infarction as classified by age and gender. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in a coronary care unit of a regional urban medical center in northern Iran (Amol). A total of 366 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction were recruited from January to June 2013. Patient demographic information, past medical history, and current symptom data were collected. Results: Multivariatelogisticanalyseswereperformedtoidentifyriskpredictorsof myocardialinfarctionpatientsclassifiedbyage andgender. Riskpredictorsforolderpatientsweredyspnea,OR=1.76(95% CI1.01,3.06),weaknessoddsratio=2.35(95% CI1.31,4.21), nausea odds ratio = 1.83 (95% CI 1.04, 3.20), vomiting odds ratio = 2.48 (95% CI 1.34, 4.57), fatigue odds ratio=1.87 (95% CI 1.02, 3.39), belching, odds ratio = 2.13 (95% CI 1.08, 4.20), and hiccups odds ratio = 2.81 (95% CI 1.25, 6.30). Sub group analysis in older women patients identified weakness odds ratio = 3.13 (95% CI 1.11, 8.85), and belching odds ratio = 34.70 (95% CI 3.86, 312.2) as risk predictors. Among older men patients, the predominant symptoms were sweating odds ratio = 3.74 (95% CI 1.06, 13.2) and vomiting odds ratio = 2.54 (95% CI 1.10, 5.91). Conclusions: Thisstudyconcludesthatolderacutemyocardialinfractionpatientsweremorelikelytohavenon-specificsymptoms. Initial assessment for acute myocardial infarction should consider the possibility of non-specific clinical manifestations, such as weakness and belching in older women, and sweating and vomiting in older men. with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Differences between the 2 age-groups on demographical and clinical details were assessed using Chi-square tests with odds ratios (95% Confidence Interval) presented. A logistic regression was performed on the clinical symptoms and pain sites comparing the age groups adjusting for demographics and type of myocardial infraction.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ccn.68676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate clinical manifestations of acute myocardial infarction as classified by age and gender. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in a coronary care unit of a regional urban medical center in northern Iran (Amol). A total of 366 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction were recruited from January to June 2013. Patient demographic information, past medical history, and current symptom data were collected. Results: Multivariatelogisticanalyseswereperformedtoidentifyriskpredictorsof myocardialinfarctionpatientsclassifiedbyage andgender. Riskpredictorsforolderpatientsweredyspnea,OR=1.76(95% CI1.01,3.06),weaknessoddsratio=2.35(95% CI1.31,4.21), nausea odds ratio = 1.83 (95% CI 1.04, 3.20), vomiting odds ratio = 2.48 (95% CI 1.34, 4.57), fatigue odds ratio=1.87 (95% CI 1.02, 3.39), belching, odds ratio = 2.13 (95% CI 1.08, 4.20), and hiccups odds ratio = 2.81 (95% CI 1.25, 6.30). Sub group analysis in older women patients identified weakness odds ratio = 3.13 (95% CI 1.11, 8.85), and belching odds ratio = 34.70 (95% CI 3.86, 312.2) as risk predictors. Among older men patients, the predominant symptoms were sweating odds ratio = 3.74 (95% CI 1.06, 13.2) and vomiting odds ratio = 2.54 (95% CI 1.10, 5.91). Conclusions: Thisstudyconcludesthatolderacutemyocardialinfractionpatientsweremorelikelytohavenon-specificsymptoms. Initial assessment for acute myocardial infarction should consider the possibility of non-specific clinical manifestations, such as weakness and belching in older women, and sweating and vomiting in older men. with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Differences between the 2 age-groups on demographical and clinical details were assessed using Chi-square tests with odds ratios (95% Confidence Interval) presented. A logistic regression was performed on the clinical symptoms and pain sites comparing the age groups adjusting for demographics and type of myocardial infraction.
急性心肌梗死的临床表现:按年龄和性别分类
背景:本研究的目的是评价急性心肌梗死的临床表现,并根据年龄和性别进行分类。方法:这项横断面研究是在伊朗北部地区城市医疗中心(Amol)的冠状动脉护理单位进行的。2013年1月至6月共招募366例诊断为急性心肌梗死的患者。收集患者人口统计信息、既往病史和当前症状数据。结果:对心肌梗死患者按年龄和性别分类的风险预测因素进行了多变量logistic分析。老年患者的风险预测指标为:呼吸困难,OR=1.76(95% CI1.01,3.06),虚弱比=2.35(95% CI1.31,4.21),恶心优势比= 1.83 (95% CI 1.04, 3.20),呕吐优势比= 2.48 (95% CI 1.34, 4.57),疲劳优势比=1.87 (95% CI 1.02, 3.39),打嗝,优势比= 2.13 (95% CI 1.08, 4.20),打嗝优势比= 2.81 (95% CI 1.25, 6.30)。老年女性患者的亚组分析发现虚弱的优势比= 3.13 (95% CI 1.11, 8.85),打嗝的优势比= 34.70 (95% CI 3.86, 312.2)是风险预测因素。在老年男性患者中,主要症状为出汗优势比= 3.74 (95% CI 1.06, 13.2)和呕吐优势比= 2.54 (95% CI 1.10, 5.91)。结论:Thisstudyconcludesthatolderacutemyocardialinfractionpatientsweremorelikelytohavenon-specificsymptoms。对急性心肌梗死的初步评估应考虑非特异性临床表现的可能性,如老年女性虚弱和打嗝,老年男性出汗和呕吐。差异均有统计学意义,P < 0.05。采用卡方检验评估两个年龄组在人口学和临床细节上的差异,并给出比值比(95%置信区间)。对临床症状和疼痛部位进行逻辑回归,比较各组调整人口统计学和心肌梗死类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信