Lexical cohesion revisited. A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
María de los Ángeles Gómez González
{"title":"Lexical cohesion revisited. A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis","authors":"María de los Ángeles Gómez González","doi":"10.7203/qf.23.13523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I argue for a refinement of the classic SFL approach to lexical cohesion. First, a literature overview is provided in which key principles and related categories are examined. In addition, the connection of cohesion and discourse coherence is addressed and an overview is provided of the wide range of applications that the former has in such fields as genre studies, language teaching and learning, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics, among others. The core SFL models of cohesion are then revisited in order to propose a modified taxonomy of lexical cohesion, involving five distinct types (repetition, synonymy, opposition, inclusion and association) that are cross-classified by four kinds of distance-based ties (immediate, immediate-mediated, remote and remote-mediated). After this, the model is attested in the telephone conversation and broadcast discussion components of the International Corpus of English-Great Britain. The analysis of 10,042 cohesive ties reveals that repetition and association are the most frequently used lexical cohesion strategies across the two genres. They are overwhelmingly produced over speakers’ turns and remote-mediated ties. The results further indicate that lexical patterns collaborate in topic management, staging and turn-taking strategies.","PeriodicalId":40958,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.23.13523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article I argue for a refinement of the classic SFL approach to lexical cohesion. First, a literature overview is provided in which key principles and related categories are examined. In addition, the connection of cohesion and discourse coherence is addressed and an overview is provided of the wide range of applications that the former has in such fields as genre studies, language teaching and learning, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics, among others. The core SFL models of cohesion are then revisited in order to propose a modified taxonomy of lexical cohesion, involving five distinct types (repetition, synonymy, opposition, inclusion and association) that are cross-classified by four kinds of distance-based ties (immediate, immediate-mediated, remote and remote-mediated). After this, the model is attested in the telephone conversation and broadcast discussion components of the International Corpus of English-Great Britain. The analysis of 10,042 cohesive ties reveals that repetition and association are the most frequently used lexical cohesion strategies across the two genres. They are overwhelmingly produced over speakers’ turns and remote-mediated ties. The results further indicate that lexical patterns collaborate in topic management, staging and turn-taking strategies.
重新审视词汇衔接。语料库与系统功能分析相结合
在这篇文章中,我主张对经典的外语词汇衔接方法进行改进。首先,提供了文献综述,其中主要原则和相关类别进行了检查。此外,本文还讨论了衔接与语篇连贯的关系,并概述了衔接与语篇连贯在文体研究、语言教学、心理语言学和计算语言学等领域的广泛应用。在此基础上,本文重新审视了核心的外语衔接模型,提出了一种改进的词汇衔接分类法,包括五种不同的类型(重复、同义、对立、包含和联想),并根据四种基于距离的联系(即时、即时介导、远程和远程介导)进行交叉分类。然后,在《国际英语-大不列颠语料库》的电话会话部分和广播讨论部分对该模型进行了验证。对10042条衔接关系的分析表明,重复和联想是两种文体中最常用的词汇衔接策略。它们绝大多数是通过演讲者的轮流和远程中介关系产生的。结果进一步表明,词汇模式在话题管理、阶段和轮换策略中起协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信