Residual Curvature Method of Mitigating Lateral Buckling for HPHT PIP System – A case study

Venu Rao, T. Sriskandarajah, Carlos Charnaux, Alan Roy, P. Ragupathy, S. Eyssautier
{"title":"Residual Curvature Method of Mitigating Lateral Buckling for HPHT PIP System – A case study","authors":"Venu Rao, T. Sriskandarajah, Carlos Charnaux, Alan Roy, P. Ragupathy, S. Eyssautier","doi":"10.4043/29603-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Lateral buckling mitigation design for HPHT pipe-in-pipe system is technically challenging and at times the reliability of proven buckling mitigation options may come into severe technical scrutiny for some HPHT pipe in pipe systems on the undulating seabed. The Residual Curvature Method (RCM) presents as an alternative technical option for such cases. The technique comprises understraightening in intermittent sections of the ‘as-laid’ pipeline which form ‘expansion loops’ and provide a proven, reliable and cost-effective buckling mitigation. The method was successfully implemented in Statoil’s Skuld project in 2012 and subsequently a few other projects worldwide which are all single pipeline systems. However, the RC method was not used as a buckling mitigation method for a pipe in pipe system to date to the knowledge of the authors.\n Residual curvature method could be proven superior for HPHT Pipe-in-Pipe Systems to other lateral buckling methods (thanks to controlled well-developed buckles at pre-determined locations) under some favourable design conditions. This paper shows the robustness of the technique for a typical 12\" / 16\" HPHT pipe in pipe system with an operating pressure of 300barg and 150°C operating in a maximum water depth of 2000m as a case study. The PIP system is considered to be laid by a reel-lay method, which is amenable to inducing the residual curvature at the pre-determined RC locations during pipelay process.\n The study includes the special considerations required in deploying the method on an undulating seabed taking into account unplanned buckles or spans and the necessary adjustment to be made to pre-determined buckle sites. The study includes the effects of inner pipe snaking (with residual curvature) within a near straight outer pipe due to the reeling process and its impact on the lateral buckling behaviour. Other design features that may have a significant effect on the RC method are discussed.","PeriodicalId":10968,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, May 08, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, May 08, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29603-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Lateral buckling mitigation design for HPHT pipe-in-pipe system is technically challenging and at times the reliability of proven buckling mitigation options may come into severe technical scrutiny for some HPHT pipe in pipe systems on the undulating seabed. The Residual Curvature Method (RCM) presents as an alternative technical option for such cases. The technique comprises understraightening in intermittent sections of the ‘as-laid’ pipeline which form ‘expansion loops’ and provide a proven, reliable and cost-effective buckling mitigation. The method was successfully implemented in Statoil’s Skuld project in 2012 and subsequently a few other projects worldwide which are all single pipeline systems. However, the RC method was not used as a buckling mitigation method for a pipe in pipe system to date to the knowledge of the authors. Residual curvature method could be proven superior for HPHT Pipe-in-Pipe Systems to other lateral buckling methods (thanks to controlled well-developed buckles at pre-determined locations) under some favourable design conditions. This paper shows the robustness of the technique for a typical 12" / 16" HPHT pipe in pipe system with an operating pressure of 300barg and 150°C operating in a maximum water depth of 2000m as a case study. The PIP system is considered to be laid by a reel-lay method, which is amenable to inducing the residual curvature at the pre-determined RC locations during pipelay process. The study includes the special considerations required in deploying the method on an undulating seabed taking into account unplanned buckles or spans and the necessary adjustment to be made to pre-determined buckle sites. The study includes the effects of inner pipe snaking (with residual curvature) within a near straight outer pipe due to the reeling process and its impact on the lateral buckling behaviour. Other design features that may have a significant effect on the RC method are discussed.
残余曲率法减轻HPHT PIP系统侧向屈曲的实例研究
高压高压管中管系统的横向屈曲缓解设计在技术上具有挑战性,对于起伏海床上的一些高压高压管中管系统,有时经过验证的屈曲缓解方案的可靠性可能会受到严格的技术审查。残差曲率法(RCM)是这种情况下的另一种技术选择。该技术包括在“敷设”管道的间歇段进行校直,形成“膨胀环”,并提供经过验证的、可靠的、经济有效的屈曲缓解方法。该方法于2012年在挪威国家石油公司的Skuld项目中成功实施,随后在全球范围内的其他几个项目中都采用了单管道系统。然而,据作者所知,到目前为止,RC方法还没有被用作管中管系统的屈曲缓解方法。在一些有利的设计条件下,残余曲率法可以证明比其他侧向屈曲方法更适合高温高压管中管系统(由于在预定位置控制良好的屈曲)。本文以一个典型的12”/ 16”高压高压管道系统为例,展示了该技术的鲁棒性,该管道系统的工作压力为300barg,工作温度为150°C,最大水深为2000m。PIP系统被认为是采用卷卷铺设法铺设的,该方法易于在管道铺设过程中在预定的RC位置产生残余曲率。该研究包括在起伏的海床上部署该方法所需的特殊考虑,考虑到意外的屈曲或跨度以及对预先确定的屈曲位置进行必要的调整。该研究包括由于卷取过程引起的管内弯曲(含残余曲率)对近直外管的影响及其对侧向屈曲行为的影响。其他设计特点,可能有显著影响的钢筋混凝土方法进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信