Influence of different methods of bone processing on bone mechanical properties

Q3 Medicine
A. P. Antipov, E. M. Gordina, M. Markov, S. Bozhkova
{"title":"Influence of different methods of bone processing on bone mechanical properties","authors":"A. P. Antipov, E. M. Gordina, M. Markov, S. Bozhkova","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2022-28-6-783-787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Bone graft is the best option to repair postsurgical bone defects. The biomaterial is highly adaptive, structurally dynamic, metabolically active and characterized by high strength. Standard preparation of grafts for implantation includes cleaning followed by deep freezing and sterilization. However, methods used for processing bone material and reagents can change the biomechanical properties of the bone. The purpose was to explore the effect of chemical purification and subsequent lyophilization on the mechanical strength of bone grafts in comparison with native fresh frozen bone. Material and methods Metaepiphyseal sections of a single level of one tibia of a single cattle were used to rule out the influence of the variable density of native bone obtained from different donors. The bone was cut into blocks with a hand saw. Three groups of samples formed depending on the processing method included freshly frozen native bone, bone purified by combined chemical and physical methods and bone purified by the same technique followed by lyophilization. Mechanical properties were measured by axial compression mode using a 1958U-10-1 strength machine. Statistical data analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and the Lilliefors correction with statistical significance of differences assessed with one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA). Results The cross-sectional area of hand-made blocks was comparable. No decrease in bone strength below the baseline was recorded regardless of the method of bone processing. Purified bone blocks demonstrated maximum strength characteristics prior to lyophilization. The sample strength decreased after lyophilization and was higher as compared to freshly frozen native bone. No statistically significant differences in the maximum force applied and the cross-sectional area were recorded between groups of samples. Modulus of elasticity and relative deformation had statistically significant differences in the groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion Modern methods of bone processing were shown to maintain biomechanical properties of the bone and can be used in the form of bone blocks or chips and as a structural graft.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2022-28-6-783-787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Bone graft is the best option to repair postsurgical bone defects. The biomaterial is highly adaptive, structurally dynamic, metabolically active and characterized by high strength. Standard preparation of grafts for implantation includes cleaning followed by deep freezing and sterilization. However, methods used for processing bone material and reagents can change the biomechanical properties of the bone. The purpose was to explore the effect of chemical purification and subsequent lyophilization on the mechanical strength of bone grafts in comparison with native fresh frozen bone. Material and methods Metaepiphyseal sections of a single level of one tibia of a single cattle were used to rule out the influence of the variable density of native bone obtained from different donors. The bone was cut into blocks with a hand saw. Three groups of samples formed depending on the processing method included freshly frozen native bone, bone purified by combined chemical and physical methods and bone purified by the same technique followed by lyophilization. Mechanical properties were measured by axial compression mode using a 1958U-10-1 strength machine. Statistical data analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and the Lilliefors correction with statistical significance of differences assessed with one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA). Results The cross-sectional area of hand-made blocks was comparable. No decrease in bone strength below the baseline was recorded regardless of the method of bone processing. Purified bone blocks demonstrated maximum strength characteristics prior to lyophilization. The sample strength decreased after lyophilization and was higher as compared to freshly frozen native bone. No statistically significant differences in the maximum force applied and the cross-sectional area were recorded between groups of samples. Modulus of elasticity and relative deformation had statistically significant differences in the groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion Modern methods of bone processing were shown to maintain biomechanical properties of the bone and can be used in the form of bone blocks or chips and as a structural graft.
不同骨加工方法对骨力学性能的影响
骨移植是修复术后骨缺损的最佳选择。该生物材料具有高适应性、结构动态、代谢活性和高强度等特点。植入术的标准准备包括清洁、深度冷冻和灭菌。然而,用于处理骨材料和试剂的方法可以改变骨的生物力学特性。目的是探讨化学纯化和随后的冻干对骨移植物机械强度的影响,并与天然新鲜冷冻骨进行比较。材料和方法采用单头牛胫骨的骺后切片,以排除来自不同供体的天然骨密度变化的影响。这块骨头是用手锯切成块的。根据处理方法的不同,形成的三组样品包括新鲜冷冻的天然骨,化学和物理联合方法纯化的骨和用相同技术纯化的骨,然后进行冻干。采用1958U-10-1强度试验机进行轴向压缩力学性能测试。统计资料分析采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S)检验和Lilliefors校正,采用单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)评估差异有统计学意义。结果手工砌块的横截面积具有可比性。无论采用何种骨加工方法,均未记录到骨强度低于基线的下降。纯化的骨块在冻干前表现出最大的强度特征。冻干后,样品强度下降,比新鲜冷冻的天然骨高。两组样品的最大作用力和横截面积没有统计学上的显著差异。各组间弹性模量、相对变形量差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论现代骨处理方法可保持骨的生物力学特性,可作为骨块或骨片或结构移植物使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信