Here, Queer, and Paranoid! On Acrid Sociality and Collaborating Otherwise

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
Ryan M. Conrad, G. Pelletier
{"title":"Here, Queer, and Paranoid! On Acrid Sociality and Collaborating Otherwise","authors":"Ryan M. Conrad, G. Pelletier","doi":"10.14321/qed.9.issue-2.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The work required of politicized subjects to act together, across difference towards transformative justice, is inexhaustible, complex, and difficult. Sometimes it is a battle to speak to one's peers, let alone act in concert with them. This article addresses destructive tendencies of intracommunal queer relationality in particular. Recent events within queer networks have helped us to understand particular impasses in queer organizing as acerbic and self-destructive—what we term here as \"acrid.\" In such instances, although some useful spaces for critique, criticism, praise, questions, wonderings, rants, reflections, and connections opened up, battlefields on which allied community members viciously attacked one another also manifested. Although generative at times, the debates and dialogues contained a great deal of vitriol, judgment, complacency, demands for apologies and annihilation, and in some instances, threatening and violent language, all which inhibit the momentum of our movements. This article is neither a content analysis of these myriad breakdowns in queer collaboration, nor are we interested in proving that such examples of destructive paradoxical relationality indeed happen. They happen. Instead, we assess the damage of devastated intracommunal relations, consider their queer propensities, and creatively theorize alternative possibilities for better collaborations throughout our queer spaces, communities, and futures.","PeriodicalId":43840,"journal":{"name":"QED-A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking","volume":"81 1","pages":"69 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QED-A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.9.issue-2.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The work required of politicized subjects to act together, across difference towards transformative justice, is inexhaustible, complex, and difficult. Sometimes it is a battle to speak to one's peers, let alone act in concert with them. This article addresses destructive tendencies of intracommunal queer relationality in particular. Recent events within queer networks have helped us to understand particular impasses in queer organizing as acerbic and self-destructive—what we term here as "acrid." In such instances, although some useful spaces for critique, criticism, praise, questions, wonderings, rants, reflections, and connections opened up, battlefields on which allied community members viciously attacked one another also manifested. Although generative at times, the debates and dialogues contained a great deal of vitriol, judgment, complacency, demands for apologies and annihilation, and in some instances, threatening and violent language, all which inhibit the momentum of our movements. This article is neither a content analysis of these myriad breakdowns in queer collaboration, nor are we interested in proving that such examples of destructive paradoxical relationality indeed happen. They happen. Instead, we assess the damage of devastated intracommunal relations, consider their queer propensities, and creatively theorize alternative possibilities for better collaborations throughout our queer spaces, communities, and futures.
来,古怪的偏执狂!论辛辣的社会性和协作性
政治化的主体跨越差异,共同行动,走向变革的正义,这是一项无穷无尽、复杂而艰巨的工作。有时,与同龄人交谈是一场战斗,更不用说与他们一起行动了。这篇文章特别讨论了社区内酷儿关系的破坏性倾向。最近发生在酷儿网络中的事件帮助我们理解了酷儿组织中某些特别的僵局,即尖刻和自我毁灭——我们在这里称之为“辛辣”。在这种情况下,虽然一些有用的批评、批评、赞扬、问题、好奇、咆哮、反思和联系的空间开放了,但联盟社区成员相互恶意攻击的战场也出现了。尽管辩论和对话有时具有创造性,但其中包含了大量的尖刻、评判、自满、道歉和毁灭的要求,在某些情况下,还有威胁和暴力的语言,所有这些都抑制了我们运动的势头。这篇文章既不是对酷儿合作中无数的破裂进行内容分析,我们也没有兴趣证明这种破坏性的矛盾关系确实发生过。他们发生。相反,我们评估被破坏的社区内关系的损害,考虑他们的酷儿倾向,并创造性地理论化在我们的酷儿空间,社区和未来更好的合作的其他可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信