Regulating Composite Platform Economy Services: Examining the Applicable Legal Framework in Light of Recent Judicial Developments

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Augustin Chapuis-Doppler, Vincent Delhomme
{"title":"Regulating Composite Platform Economy Services: Examining the Applicable Legal Framework in Light of Recent Judicial Developments","authors":"Augustin Chapuis-Doppler, Vincent Delhomme","doi":"10.54648/leie2022003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous platform operators provide composite services comprising electronic and non-electronic elements, whose legal classification has been highly debated. This is partly explained by the fact that theEU law regime applicable to information society services (ISS) is far more favourable to businesses than that applicable to other types of services. The most recent case-law, however, has noticeably strengthened Member State regulatory prerogatives regarding ISS by, inter alia, giving a whole new meaning to the provisions of the E-commerce Directive. This twenty-year old legal act certainly needed reshuffling, but the Court’s approach has created a high degree of uncertainty forMember States wishing to regulate ISS in compliance with their notification obligations. Further, the applicable legal framework fails to guarantee the freedom to provide composite platform economy services that classify as two independent services of offline and online nature. The present article presents the main takeaways from recent judgments and highlights the structural differences between the legal regime applicable to ISS and that applicable to other kind of services, as well as their shortcomings.\nDigital Single Market – Regulation of the platform economy – Composite services – notification – online platform liability – e-commerce – Digital Services Act – Directive 2000/31 – Directive 2015/1535 – Directive 2006/123","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2022003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous platform operators provide composite services comprising electronic and non-electronic elements, whose legal classification has been highly debated. This is partly explained by the fact that theEU law regime applicable to information society services (ISS) is far more favourable to businesses than that applicable to other types of services. The most recent case-law, however, has noticeably strengthened Member State regulatory prerogatives regarding ISS by, inter alia, giving a whole new meaning to the provisions of the E-commerce Directive. This twenty-year old legal act certainly needed reshuffling, but the Court’s approach has created a high degree of uncertainty forMember States wishing to regulate ISS in compliance with their notification obligations. Further, the applicable legal framework fails to guarantee the freedom to provide composite platform economy services that classify as two independent services of offline and online nature. The present article presents the main takeaways from recent judgments and highlights the structural differences between the legal regime applicable to ISS and that applicable to other kind of services, as well as their shortcomings. Digital Single Market – Regulation of the platform economy – Composite services – notification – online platform liability – e-commerce – Digital Services Act – Directive 2000/31 – Directive 2015/1535 – Directive 2006/123
规制复合平台经济服务:从近期司法发展看适用法律框架
许多平台运营商提供包括电子和非电子元素的复合服务,其法律分类一直备受争议。部分原因在于,欧盟适用于信息社会服务(ISS)的法律制度远比适用于其他类型服务的法律制度对企业更有利。然而,最近的判例法明显加强了成员国对国际空间站的管制特权,除其他外,赋予电子商务指令的规定全新的含义。这一已有20年历史的法律行为当然需要重新洗牌,但法院的做法给希望按照其通知义务管制国际空间站的会员国造成了高度的不确定性。此外,适用的法律框架未能保障提供组合平台经济服务的自由,这些服务被归类为离线和在线两种独立的服务。本文介绍了最近判决的主要要点,并强调了适用于国际空间站和适用于其他类型服务的法律制度之间的结构性差异,以及它们的缺点。数字单一市场-平台经济监管-复合服务-通知-在线平台责任-电子商务-数字服务法案-指令2000/31 -指令2015/1535 -指令2006/123
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信