On the Ambiguity of Firsts: Symbiogeny and Evolutionary Creativity

S. Shostak
{"title":"On the Ambiguity of Firsts: Symbiogeny and Evolutionary Creativity","authors":"S. Shostak","doi":"10.24105/2168-9296.2019.8.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I want to take issue with static concepts of origins. Predecessors of what exists at present are not necessarily what came first. It isn’t as if the problem of identifying origins is unique to biology. Western culture is dominated by concepts of origins firmly rooted in the present. Historically, Western religions have assigned priority to what exists by anointing it with attributes of origins and characterizing these attributes as fundamental. God, after all, is said to have created man in his image amounting to a first among firsts. At the expense of God’s image, symgiogeny theory flies in the face of the rule that what is must have its origin in something similar that came before. My object here is to examine how originary prejudices distort questions of origins and the attributes of ancestors. I’m especially eager to strip away notions of original characteristics from present organisms. I want to imagine what was different in the past.","PeriodicalId":9775,"journal":{"name":"Cell & developmental biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell & developmental biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24105/2168-9296.2019.8.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I want to take issue with static concepts of origins. Predecessors of what exists at present are not necessarily what came first. It isn’t as if the problem of identifying origins is unique to biology. Western culture is dominated by concepts of origins firmly rooted in the present. Historically, Western religions have assigned priority to what exists by anointing it with attributes of origins and characterizing these attributes as fundamental. God, after all, is said to have created man in his image amounting to a first among firsts. At the expense of God’s image, symgiogeny theory flies in the face of the rule that what is must have its origin in something similar that came before. My object here is to examine how originary prejudices distort questions of origins and the attributes of ancestors. I’m especially eager to strip away notions of original characteristics from present organisms. I want to imagine what was different in the past.
论第一的模糊性:共生与进化创造
我想对起源的静态概念提出质疑。现存事物的前身并不一定是最先出现的事物。确定起源的问题似乎并不是生物学所独有的。西方文化被牢牢扎根于当下的起源概念所主导。从历史上看,西方宗教通过赋予其起源属性并将这些属性定性为基本属性来优先考虑存在的事物。毕竟,据说上帝是按照自己的形象创造了人,使他成为第一中的第一。以牺牲上帝的形象为代价,同系性理论公然违背了这样的规则,即现在的东西必须起源于之前类似的东西。我在这里的目的是研究最初的偏见是如何扭曲起源和祖先属性的问题的。我特别渴望从现存的生物体中剥离出原始特征的概念。我想想象一下过去有什么不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信