Exteriorization of uterus versus intrabdominal uterine closure at Caesarean delivery

B. Lamichhane, Shreesiya Pokharel
{"title":"Exteriorization of uterus versus intrabdominal uterine closure at Caesarean delivery","authors":"B. Lamichhane, Shreesiya Pokharel","doi":"10.3126/njog.v15i2.32917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To assess the intraoperative and post-operative complications of exteriorization repair with intrabdominal repair of uterus during caesarean delivery. \n Method: This was a prospective comparative study of 150 caesarean deliveries. Randomization of the cases was irrespective of age, parity, indication and elective or emergency and was performed by two surgeons. Total of 150 cases were considered in the study and 75 cases performed by each surgeon were selected. One surgeon performed the surgery as intrabdominal repair while the other exteriorized the uterus for closure. Descriptive parameter and t-test were used. \nResults: Intraoperative complications like intraoperative nausea, vomiting, pain were more commonly associated in cases in which uterus was exteriorized. In regards to severity of blood loss in either group there was no significant difference in either group (1.28±1.00, 1.23±0.98). The study revealed no significant difference in febrile morbidity and wound infections in either group. \nConclusions: There is no significant difference in the post-operative morbidity between the two groups but intraoperative peritoneal stretching pain was more when uterus was exteriorized. \nKeywords: caesarean delivery, exteriorization, intrabdominal repair, uterine closure","PeriodicalId":30234,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v15i2.32917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the intraoperative and post-operative complications of exteriorization repair with intrabdominal repair of uterus during caesarean delivery. Method: This was a prospective comparative study of 150 caesarean deliveries. Randomization of the cases was irrespective of age, parity, indication and elective or emergency and was performed by two surgeons. Total of 150 cases were considered in the study and 75 cases performed by each surgeon were selected. One surgeon performed the surgery as intrabdominal repair while the other exteriorized the uterus for closure. Descriptive parameter and t-test were used. Results: Intraoperative complications like intraoperative nausea, vomiting, pain were more commonly associated in cases in which uterus was exteriorized. In regards to severity of blood loss in either group there was no significant difference in either group (1.28±1.00, 1.23±0.98). The study revealed no significant difference in febrile morbidity and wound infections in either group. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the post-operative morbidity between the two groups but intraoperative peritoneal stretching pain was more when uterus was exteriorized. Keywords: caesarean delivery, exteriorization, intrabdominal repair, uterine closure
剖宫产术中子宫外置与腹内子宫关闭的比较
目的:探讨剖宫产术中子宫外置修复联合腹内修复术的术中及术后并发症。方法:对150例剖宫产进行前瞻性比较研究。病例的随机化与年龄、胎次、指征、择期或急诊无关,由两名外科医生进行。研究共考虑150例,每位外科医生选择75例。一名外科医生进行腹内修复手术,另一名外科医生进行子宫外闭合手术。采用描述性参数和t检验。结果:术中恶心、呕吐、疼痛等并发症多见于子宫外置术中。两组出血量差异无统计学意义(1.28±1.00,1.23±0.98)。研究显示两组在发热发病率和伤口感染方面无显著差异。结论:两组术后发病率差异无统计学意义,但术中子宫外展时腹膜拉伸疼痛较多。关键词:剖宫产,外置术,腹内修复,子宫闭合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信