COMPENSATION OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY PUBLIC ENTITIES IN THE SPHERE OF REGULATORY ACTIVITIES: SEPARATE THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS

T.A. Frantsuz-Yakovets, O. Havrylenko
{"title":"COMPENSATION OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY PUBLIC ENTITIES IN THE SPHERE OF REGULATORY ACTIVITIES: SEPARATE THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS","authors":"T.A. Frantsuz-Yakovets, O. Havrylenko","doi":"10.31732/2708-339x-2022-03-42-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article attempts to analyze the grounds for bringing public entities to tort liability for damage caused to individuals by the adoption of a legal act of individual action, which was later recognized as illegal and canceled in a court of law. The primary purpose of the adoption of normative legal acts is, in particular, the creation of additional conditions for the realization of the rights of individuals or their protection; in practice, situations often arise when the consequence of the adoption of a normative legal act is a violation of the rights of individuals or legal entities. That is why the legislator provided for the responsibility of public entities for damage caused to individuals by the adoption of a normative legal act in Art. 1175 of the Central Committee of Ukraine. This norm provides that the damage caused to a natural or legal person as a result of the adoption by the authority of a normative legal act, which was recognized as illegal and canceled, shall be compensated by a public entity represented by the relevant authority: the state, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or a local self-government body. Having analyzed it, one can come to the conclusion that the basis of its application is the assignment of damage by the adoption of the normative legal act itself. However, the civil legislation provides that the court can declare illegal and cancel not only normative legal acts.","PeriodicalId":76144,"journal":{"name":"Medico-legal bulletin","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-legal bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31732/2708-339x-2022-03-42-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scientific article attempts to analyze the grounds for bringing public entities to tort liability for damage caused to individuals by the adoption of a legal act of individual action, which was later recognized as illegal and canceled in a court of law. The primary purpose of the adoption of normative legal acts is, in particular, the creation of additional conditions for the realization of the rights of individuals or their protection; in practice, situations often arise when the consequence of the adoption of a normative legal act is a violation of the rights of individuals or legal entities. That is why the legislator provided for the responsibility of public entities for damage caused to individuals by the adoption of a normative legal act in Art. 1175 of the Central Committee of Ukraine. This norm provides that the damage caused to a natural or legal person as a result of the adoption by the authority of a normative legal act, which was recognized as illegal and canceled, shall be compensated by a public entity represented by the relevant authority: the state, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or a local self-government body. Having analyzed it, one can come to the conclusion that the basis of its application is the assignment of damage by the adoption of the normative legal act itself. However, the civil legislation provides that the court can declare illegal and cancel not only normative legal acts.
公共实体在管制活动领域所造成损害的赔偿:分别的理论和法律方面
这篇科学的文章试图分析通过采取个人行为的合法行为使公共实体对个人造成的损害承担侵权责任的依据,这种行为后来被法院认定为非法并被取消。通过规范性法律行为的主要目的,特别在于为实现个人权利或保护个人权利创造额外的条件;在实践中,常常出现这样的情况,即通过规范性法律行为的后果是侵犯个人或法律实体的权利。因此,立法者在乌克兰中央委员会第1175条中通过了一项规范性法律行为,规定公共实体对对个人造成的损害负有责任。这一规范规定,由于当局通过一项规范性法律行为而对自然人或法人造成的损害,该规范性法律行为被认定为非法并被取消,应由有关当局所代表的公共实体:国家、克里米亚自治共和国或地方自治机构予以赔偿。在对其进行分析之后,人们可以得出结论,即其适用的基础是通过采用规范性法律行为本身来指定损害。然而,民事立法规定,法院不仅可以宣布规范性法律行为违法,还可以宣布其违法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信