Exploring the Ripple Effect and Consequences of Correspondent Banking De-Risking on Global Financial Inclusion and Stability: Evidence from Europe

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
James Swift Banville
{"title":"Exploring the Ripple Effect and Consequences of Correspondent Banking De-Risking on Global Financial Inclusion and Stability: Evidence from Europe","authors":"James Swift Banville","doi":"10.53819/81018102t4131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the ripple effect and consequences of correspondent banking de-risking on global financial inclusion and stability, with a specific focus on evidence from Europe. Driven primarily by increased compliance requirements and the need to mitigate risks associated with anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism regulations, de-risking led to the termination of correspondent banking relationships with various countries and financial institutions. The research aimed to understand the implications of this phenomenon on financial integration, access to essential financial services, and the exacerbation of economic disparities among different regions and demographic groups in Europe. A descriptive research design approach was employed, mainly quantitative analysis of CBR data and regulatory changes. The findings demonstrated that de-risking had a significant negative impact on financial inclusion and stability, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises, non-profit organizations, and marginalized communities. Moreover, the termination of CBRs disrupted the flow of remittances, trade finance, and development aid, and led to an increased reliance on less-regulated, informal channels, which in turn undermined the global AML/CFT regime and exacerbated financial crime and systemic risks. Based on these findings, the study recommended enhancing collaboration and coordination among regulatory authorities, financial institutions, and affected stakeholders to develop a harmonized regulatory framework across European countries, implement a risk-based approach, and establish a centralized information-sharing platform. Additionally, targeted capacity-building efforts, exploration of innovative financial solutions, and the development of financial inclusion strategies prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable segments of the population were recommended to counteract the negative effects of de-risking and promote financial inclusion and stability in Europe. Keywords: Correspondent banking de-risking, financial inclusion, global financial stability, anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism","PeriodicalId":39488,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the ripple effect and consequences of correspondent banking de-risking on global financial inclusion and stability, with a specific focus on evidence from Europe. Driven primarily by increased compliance requirements and the need to mitigate risks associated with anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism regulations, de-risking led to the termination of correspondent banking relationships with various countries and financial institutions. The research aimed to understand the implications of this phenomenon on financial integration, access to essential financial services, and the exacerbation of economic disparities among different regions and demographic groups in Europe. A descriptive research design approach was employed, mainly quantitative analysis of CBR data and regulatory changes. The findings demonstrated that de-risking had a significant negative impact on financial inclusion and stability, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises, non-profit organizations, and marginalized communities. Moreover, the termination of CBRs disrupted the flow of remittances, trade finance, and development aid, and led to an increased reliance on less-regulated, informal channels, which in turn undermined the global AML/CFT regime and exacerbated financial crime and systemic risks. Based on these findings, the study recommended enhancing collaboration and coordination among regulatory authorities, financial institutions, and affected stakeholders to develop a harmonized regulatory framework across European countries, implement a risk-based approach, and establish a centralized information-sharing platform. Additionally, targeted capacity-building efforts, exploration of innovative financial solutions, and the development of financial inclusion strategies prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable segments of the population were recommended to counteract the negative effects of de-risking and promote financial inclusion and stability in Europe. Keywords: Correspondent banking de-risking, financial inclusion, global financial stability, anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism
代理银行去风险对全球金融普惠和稳定的涟漪效应和后果:来自欧洲的证据
本研究探讨了代理银行去风险对全球金融普惠和稳定的连锁反应和后果,并特别关注了来自欧洲的证据。由于合规要求的提高以及降低与反洗钱和打击资助恐怖主义条例有关的风险的需要,降低风险导致终止了与各国和金融机构的代理银行关系。该研究旨在了解这一现象对金融一体化、获得基本金融服务以及欧洲不同地区和人口群体之间经济差距加剧的影响。采用描述性研究设计方法,主要对CBR数据和监管变化进行定量分析。研究结果表明,降低风险对金融普惠和稳定产生了显著的负面影响,尤其是对中小企业、非营利组织和边缘化社区。此外,cbr的终止扰乱了汇款、贸易融资和发展援助的流动,并导致对监管较少的非正式渠道的依赖增加,这反过来破坏了全球“反洗钱”/“反恐融资”制度,加剧了金融犯罪和系统性风险。基于这些发现,该研究建议加强监管当局、金融机构和受影响的利益相关者之间的合作与协调,以在欧洲各国建立统一的监管框架,实施基于风险的方法,并建立集中的信息共享平台。此外,建议开展有针对性的能力建设工作,探索创新的金融解决方案,制定优先满足最弱势群体需求的普惠金融战略,以抵消去风险的负面影响,促进欧洲的普惠金融和稳定。关键词:代理银行去风险、普惠金融、全球金融稳定、反洗钱、打击恐怖主义融资
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting
Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Finance and accounting are seen as essential components for the successful implementation of market-based development policies supporting economic liberalisation in the rapidly emerging economies in Africa, the Middle-East and Asia. AAJFA aims to foster greater discussion and research of the development of the finance and accounting disciplines in these regions. A major feature of the journal will be to emphasise the implications of this development and the effects on businesses, academics and professionals. Topics covered include: -Asset pricing, corporate finance, banking; market microstructure -Behavioural and experimental finance; law and finance -Emerging economies: finance, audit committees, corporate governance -Islamic finance, accounting and auditing -Equity analysis and valuation, venture capital and IPOs -National GAAP and IASs compliance, harmonisation and strategies -Financial measurement/disclosure, and the quality of information reported -Accountability and social/ethical/environmental measurement/reporting -Cultural, political, institutional impact on financial measurement/disclosure -Accounting practices for intellectual capital and other intangible assets -Provision of non-audit services and impairment to auditor independence -Audit quality and auditor skills; internal control/auditing -Management accounting, control and /use of key performance indicators -Accounting education and professional development, accounting history -Public sector and not-for-profit accounting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信