Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Gliomas on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners with Magnetic Field Strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by the Method of Pseudo-Continuous Non-Contrast Perfusion

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
A. Sudarikova, A. Batalov, E. Pogosbekyan, L. Fadeeva, N. Zakharova, I. Pronin
{"title":"Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Gliomas on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners with Magnetic Field Strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by the Method of Pseudo-Continuous Non-Contrast Perfusion","authors":"A. Sudarikova, A. Batalov, E. Pogosbekyan, L. Fadeeva, N. Zakharova, I. Pronin","doi":"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to evaluate the universality of non-contrast MR perfusion (PCASL) in determining the rate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) of brain gliomas using magnetic resonance scanners with different magnetic field strengths. The maximum and normalized CBF values, which received on 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI in the same patients with histologically verified high grade gliomas (III, IV grade), were compared with each other. The data obtained by us are reliably comparable, which allows us to consider pCASL as a universal technique for scanners with different magnetic strengths.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to evaluate the universality of non-contrast MR perfusion (PCASL) in determining the rate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) of brain gliomas using magnetic resonance scanners with different magnetic field strengths. The maximum and normalized CBF values, which received on 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI in the same patients with histologically verified high grade gliomas (III, IV grade), were compared with each other. The data obtained by us are reliably comparable, which allows us to consider pCASL as a universal technique for scanners with different magnetic strengths.
假性连续非对比灌注法在1.5和3t磁场强度磁共振扫描仪上脑血流在胶质瘤中的差异
本研究的目的是评估非对比磁共振灌注(PCASL)在使用不同磁场强度的磁共振扫描仪测定脑胶质瘤脑血流量(CBF)中的普遍性。对组织学证实的高级别胶质瘤(III级、IV级)患者在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI上的最大CBF值和归一化CBF值进行比较。我们获得的数据具有可靠的可比性,这使我们能够将pCASL视为不同磁强扫描仪的通用技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信