Validation of the Apfel scoring system for identification of High-risk patients for PONV

L. Sherif, R. Hegde, Mallikajaya Mariswami, Anjali Ollapally
{"title":"Validation of the Apfel scoring system for identification of High-risk patients for PONV","authors":"L. Sherif, R. Hegde, Mallikajaya Mariswami, Anjali Ollapally","doi":"10.4103/2394-6954.173527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) still present an important problem in anesthesia. In order to identify surgical patients who may benefit from prophylactic antiemetic medication, it is of interest to evaluate the risk factors for PONV using a simple scoring system. The simplified Apfel score includes four factors: female gender, nonsmoking status, postoperative use of opioids, and previous history of PONV or motion sickness. Each of these risk factors is supposed to elevate the incidence of PONV by about 20%. The aim of this study was to validate Apfel's clinical risk assessment score for identification of patients with high risk for PONV in our hospital. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, 150 patients posted for various elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were analyzed and grouped into five groups, based on the Apfel risk scoring system. Each risk was given a score of 1, the total score being 4. PONV was monitored for 24 h and classified as grades 0, 1, and 2. Grades 1 and 2 were considered as PONV. The results obtained were analyzed for total incidence of PONV in each group of Apfel's scores and they were compared with the predicted incidence of PONV as per the documented Apfel's risk assessment. Collected data were analyzed by the Chi-square test, and the scoring system was assessed for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 150 patients assessed, a total of 42% had PONV. Patients grouped under Apfel Score I had PONV incidence of 25.5%, the group with Score II had an incidence of 37.8%, the group with Score III had 64.6%, and the group with Score IV had 83.3%. This incidence of PONV corresponded to the predicted approximate values of 20% for Apfel Score I, 40% for Apfel II, 60% for Apfel III, and 80% for Apfel IV. Conclusions: The Apfel scoring system is simple and useful for identifying patients with high risk for PONV.","PeriodicalId":17751,"journal":{"name":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-6954.173527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background and Aims: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) still present an important problem in anesthesia. In order to identify surgical patients who may benefit from prophylactic antiemetic medication, it is of interest to evaluate the risk factors for PONV using a simple scoring system. The simplified Apfel score includes four factors: female gender, nonsmoking status, postoperative use of opioids, and previous history of PONV or motion sickness. Each of these risk factors is supposed to elevate the incidence of PONV by about 20%. The aim of this study was to validate Apfel's clinical risk assessment score for identification of patients with high risk for PONV in our hospital. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, 150 patients posted for various elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were analyzed and grouped into five groups, based on the Apfel risk scoring system. Each risk was given a score of 1, the total score being 4. PONV was monitored for 24 h and classified as grades 0, 1, and 2. Grades 1 and 2 were considered as PONV. The results obtained were analyzed for total incidence of PONV in each group of Apfel's scores and they were compared with the predicted incidence of PONV as per the documented Apfel's risk assessment. Collected data were analyzed by the Chi-square test, and the scoring system was assessed for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 150 patients assessed, a total of 42% had PONV. Patients grouped under Apfel Score I had PONV incidence of 25.5%, the group with Score II had an incidence of 37.8%, the group with Score III had 64.6%, and the group with Score IV had 83.3%. This incidence of PONV corresponded to the predicted approximate values of 20% for Apfel Score I, 40% for Apfel II, 60% for Apfel III, and 80% for Apfel IV. Conclusions: The Apfel scoring system is simple and useful for identifying patients with high risk for PONV.
Apfel评分系统识别PONV高危患者的验证
背景与目的:术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍然是麻醉中的一个重要问题。为了确定可能受益于预防性止吐药物的手术患者,使用简单的评分系统评估PONV的危险因素是有意义的。简化Apfel评分包括四个因素:女性、不吸烟、术后阿片类药物使用、既往PONV或晕动病病史。这些危险因素中的每一个都被认为将PONV的发病率提高了约20%。本研究的目的是验证Apfel临床风险评估评分对我院PONV高危患者的识别作用。材料与方法:在一项前瞻性研究中,对150例全麻气管插管下择期手术患者进行分析,并根据Apfel风险评分系统将其分为五组。每个风险被打1分,总分是4分。监测PONV 24 h,并将其分为0、1、2级。1级和2级被认为是PONV。对所得结果进行分析,分析每组Apfel评分中PONV的总发生率,并根据记录的Apfel风险评估与PONV的预测发生率进行比较。收集的资料采用卡方检验进行分析,并评估评分系统的敏感性和特异性。结果:在评估的150例患者中,共有42%的患者患有PONV。Apfel评分I组PONV发生率为25.5%,评分II组发生率为37.8%,评分III组发生率为64.6%,评分IV组发生率为83.3%。PONV的发生率与Apfel评分为20%,Apfel评分为40%,Apfel评分为60%,Apfel评分为80%的预测近似值相对应。结论:Apfel评分系统简单,可用于识别PONV高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信