C. Kappel, D. Chaudhuri, K. Hassall, Shannon Theune, Sameer Sharif, W. Alhazzani, Kimberley A. Lewis
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound training for respiratory therapists: A scoping review","authors":"C. Kappel, D. Chaudhuri, K. Hassall, Shannon Theune, Sameer Sharif, W. Alhazzani, Kimberley A. Lewis","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2021-065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), although commonly used in clinical practice, is not currently included in training programs for respiratory therapists (RTs). In fact, given its ubiquity and clinical utility, RTs in Ontario, Canada, are changing their mandate to incorporate POCUS into their daily patient assessment. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of the literature, aiming to describe the current evidence of POCUS training and methods of curriculum delivery for RTs to inform an evidence-based program design. Method We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 8 July 2020. We included all studies reporting on RT training in POCUS. Documents included English language, full-text reports of all study designs. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data abstraction were done independently and in duplicate. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, including four full texts and three abstracts; all were prospective and single-center studies, except one multicenter study. Reports were from nine different countries. Studies described cardiac, lung, and procedural ultrasonography use. The majority used a combination of educational methods; didactic talks, hands-on sessions, and practical assessments being the most common methods. There was a median of 11 participants enrolled in a training session. The instructors were physicians from various specialties such as critical care, pulmonology, and radiology. Conclusions This scoping review identified seven papers that explored different methods of a POCUS curriculum delivery for RTs. From the interventions outlined, teaching POCUS skills to RTs seems feasible. However, further work needs to be done to solidify a POCUS curriculum specific to RTs and examine the impact on patient-related outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9533,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), although commonly used in clinical practice, is not currently included in training programs for respiratory therapists (RTs). In fact, given its ubiquity and clinical utility, RTs in Ontario, Canada, are changing their mandate to incorporate POCUS into their daily patient assessment. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of the literature, aiming to describe the current evidence of POCUS training and methods of curriculum delivery for RTs to inform an evidence-based program design. Method We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 8 July 2020. We included all studies reporting on RT training in POCUS. Documents included English language, full-text reports of all study designs. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data abstraction were done independently and in duplicate. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, including four full texts and three abstracts; all were prospective and single-center studies, except one multicenter study. Reports were from nine different countries. Studies described cardiac, lung, and procedural ultrasonography use. The majority used a combination of educational methods; didactic talks, hands-on sessions, and practical assessments being the most common methods. There was a median of 11 participants enrolled in a training session. The instructors were physicians from various specialties such as critical care, pulmonology, and radiology. Conclusions This scoping review identified seven papers that explored different methods of a POCUS curriculum delivery for RTs. From the interventions outlined, teaching POCUS skills to RTs seems feasible. However, further work needs to be done to solidify a POCUS curriculum specific to RTs and examine the impact on patient-related outcomes.
即时超声(POCUS)虽然在临床实践中被广泛使用,但目前还没有被纳入呼吸治疗师(RTs)的培训计划。事实上,考虑到POCUS的普遍性和临床实用性,加拿大安大略省的RTs正在改变他们的任务,将POCUS纳入他们的日常患者评估中。因此,我们对文献进行了范围综述,旨在描述POCUS培训的当前证据和RTs课程交付方法,以为循证课程设计提供信息。方法系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science自建站至2020年7月8日。我们纳入了所有报道POCUS中RT训练的研究。文献包括所有研究设计的英文、全文报告。题目和摘要筛选、全文审查和数据提取独立完成,一式两份。结果7项研究符合我们的纳入标准,包括4篇全文和3篇摘要;除一项多中心研究外,所有研究均为前瞻性单中心研究。报告来自九个不同的国家。研究描述了心脏、肺和程序超声检查的使用。大多数人采用综合的教育方法;说教式讲座、动手环节和实际评估是最常见的方法。参加培训课程的平均人数为11人。指导员是来自不同专业的医生,如重症监护、肺科和放射科。本综述确定了7篇论文,探讨了针对RTs的POCUS课程交付的不同方法。从上述干预措施来看,向RTs教授POCUS技能似乎是可行的。然而,需要进一步的工作来巩固针对RTs的POCUS课程,并检查其对患者相关结果的影响。