Analysis of endodontic radiographic imaging repeat rate: A cross-sectional study in an undergraduate clinical setting

Q3 Dentistry
Maysoon Albahiti, Tariq S Abuhaimed, Bashaer Al-Noman, Razan Hashim
{"title":"Analysis of endodontic radiographic imaging repeat rate: A cross-sectional study in an undergraduate clinical setting","authors":"Maysoon Albahiti, Tariq S Abuhaimed, Bashaer Al-Noman, Razan Hashim","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_241_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Inexperienced undergraduate dental students tend to take unnecessary radiographs during endodontic treatment, which has an adverse effect on clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to quantify the repeat rate of endodontic periapical radiographs taken by senior dental students during endodontic treatment stages and to analyze the prevalence of radiographic errors that led to repeated radiographs. In addition, the average number of visits required to complete the treatment was determined. Materials and Methods: A total of 583 cases that included 5689 periapical radiographs were collected from the records of a completed academic year. The periapical images were divided according to tooth type and the stages of the treatment procedure. The prevalence of error types, number of visits, and repeated images exceeding the number of radiographs allowed for completion of the treatment were evaluated. The collected data were statistically analyzed. Results: The overall repeat rates of anterior, premolars, and molars were 36%, 36%, and 39%, respectively (P = 0.66). The highest repeat rates were recorded during instrumentation (44%-55%), followed by obturation (36%–46%). The most common error types were working length adjustment (27%–33%), missing apex (24%–28%), and obturation adjustment (19%–24%). The mean number of visits was higher than recommended for all tooth types. Conclusions: The repeated rates of radiographs and number of visits were higher than recommended. A set of recommendations were formulated to optimize quality assurance and deliver a better-quality health service to the patients.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"204 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_241_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inexperienced undergraduate dental students tend to take unnecessary radiographs during endodontic treatment, which has an adverse effect on clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to quantify the repeat rate of endodontic periapical radiographs taken by senior dental students during endodontic treatment stages and to analyze the prevalence of radiographic errors that led to repeated radiographs. In addition, the average number of visits required to complete the treatment was determined. Materials and Methods: A total of 583 cases that included 5689 periapical radiographs were collected from the records of a completed academic year. The periapical images were divided according to tooth type and the stages of the treatment procedure. The prevalence of error types, number of visits, and repeated images exceeding the number of radiographs allowed for completion of the treatment were evaluated. The collected data were statistically analyzed. Results: The overall repeat rates of anterior, premolars, and molars were 36%, 36%, and 39%, respectively (P = 0.66). The highest repeat rates were recorded during instrumentation (44%-55%), followed by obturation (36%–46%). The most common error types were working length adjustment (27%–33%), missing apex (24%–28%), and obturation adjustment (19%–24%). The mean number of visits was higher than recommended for all tooth types. Conclusions: The repeated rates of radiographs and number of visits were higher than recommended. A set of recommendations were formulated to optimize quality assurance and deliver a better-quality health service to the patients.
根管放射成像重复率的分析:在本科临床设置的横断面研究
简介:缺乏经验的牙科本科学生在进行牙髓治疗时,往往会拍摄不必要的x线片,这对临床工作流程产生了不利影响。本研究的目的是量化高年级牙科学生在根管治疗阶段进行的根管根尖周x线片的重复率,并分析导致重复x线片的放射错误的发生率。此外,还确定了完成治疗所需的平均就诊次数。材料与方法:收集一个完整学年的病例583例,包括5689张根尖周x线片。根尖周图像根据牙齿类型和治疗过程的阶段进行划分。评估了错误类型的发生率、就诊次数和重复图像超过完成治疗所允许的x线片次数。对收集到的数据进行统计分析。结果:前磨牙、前磨牙和磨牙的总重复率分别为36%、36%和39% (P = 0.66)。最高的重复率记录在仪器期间(44%-55%),其次是封闭(36%-46%)。最常见的误差类型是工作长度调整(27%-33%)、缺尖(24%-28%)和闭孔调整(19%-24%)。所有牙齿类型的平均访视次数均高于建议。结论:本组患者x线片重复率和就诊次数均高于推荐值。制定了一套建议,以优化质量保证,为患者提供更优质的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信