Beyond instrumentalisation: gender and agency in the prevention of extreme violence in Kenya

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Elizabeth Mesok
{"title":"Beyond instrumentalisation: gender and agency in the prevention of extreme violence in Kenya","authors":"Elizabeth Mesok","doi":"10.1080/17539153.2022.2036422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the adoption of UNSCR 2242, which calls for the integration of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) and the Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) agendas, feminist scholars and activists have cautioned that such a move instrumentalises and securitises the WPS agenda and its objectives of gender equality and women’s empowerment. Based on over 80 interviews with civil society actors involved in P/CVE in Kenya – specifically, Mombasa, Isiolo and Nairobi – this article argues that both the calls for empowerment and the critiques of instrumentalization similarly draw on racialised constructions of women’s agency, or lack thereof, in the global south. Further, the instrumentalised/empowered binary is premised on a liberal feminist conceptualisation of agency only as resistance, which does not accurately capture the complex ways in which WPS actors and feminist peace activists negotiate with and work to transform security agendas. While recognising the harms caused by state and donor-led P/CVE approaches, this article centres the perspectives and experiences of men and women who work in daily violence prevention within and beyond the frame of P/CVE to theorise the agentive capacities that emerge from securitised spaces.","PeriodicalId":46483,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies on Terrorism","volume":"78 1","pages":"610 - 631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies on Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2022.2036422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the adoption of UNSCR 2242, which calls for the integration of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) and the Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) agendas, feminist scholars and activists have cautioned that such a move instrumentalises and securitises the WPS agenda and its objectives of gender equality and women’s empowerment. Based on over 80 interviews with civil society actors involved in P/CVE in Kenya – specifically, Mombasa, Isiolo and Nairobi – this article argues that both the calls for empowerment and the critiques of instrumentalization similarly draw on racialised constructions of women’s agency, or lack thereof, in the global south. Further, the instrumentalised/empowered binary is premised on a liberal feminist conceptualisation of agency only as resistance, which does not accurately capture the complex ways in which WPS actors and feminist peace activists negotiate with and work to transform security agendas. While recognising the harms caused by state and donor-led P/CVE approaches, this article centres the perspectives and experiences of men and women who work in daily violence prevention within and beyond the frame of P/CVE to theorise the agentive capacities that emerge from securitised spaces.
超越工具化:性别和机构在肯尼亚预防极端暴力
自联合国安理会通过第2242号决议,呼吁将妇女、和平与安全(WPS)议程与预防和打击暴力极端主义(P/CVE)议程整合以来,女权主义学者和活动家警告称,此举将使妇女、和平与安全议程及其性别平等和赋予妇女权力的目标变得工具化和安全化。基于对肯尼亚(特别是蒙巴萨、伊西奥洛和内罗毕)80多名参与P/CVE的公民社会行动者的采访,本文认为,无论是对赋权的呼吁,还是对工具化的批评,都类似地利用了全球南方国家女性机构的种族化结构,或者缺乏这种结构。此外,工具化/授权化的二元论的前提是自由主义女权主义者将代理视为抵抗的概念,这并没有准确地捕捉到WPS行动者和女权主义和平活动家谈判和努力改变安全议程的复杂方式。在认识到国家和捐助者主导的P/CVE方法所造成的危害的同时,本文以在P/CVE框架内外从事日常暴力预防工作的男性和女性的观点和经验为中心,对从安全空间中产生的代理能力进行了理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Critical Studies on Terrorism POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
41.70%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信