The therapeutic effect and safety of the drugs for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

R. Qiu, Jingwei Li, Yunhao Xiao, Ziyi Gao, Y. Weng, Qiran Zhang, Chengdi Wang, Han-lin Gong, Wei-min Li
{"title":"The therapeutic effect and safety of the drugs for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"R. Qiu, Jingwei Li, Yunhao Xiao, Ziyi Gao, Y. Weng, Qiran Zhang, Chengdi Wang, Han-lin Gong, Wei-min Li","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-89225/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread almost all regions of the world and caused great loss to the whole body of mankind. Thus, numerous clinical trials were conducted to find specific medicine for COVID-19 recently. However, it remains unanswered whether they are beneficial. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the COVID-19 medicine. Methods: Studies were determined through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Medline. The clinical trials of COVID-19 medicine were involved with eligible end points containing mortality, discharge rate, rate of clinical improvement and rate of serious adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) was adopted for variables as effect magnitude with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the random‐effects model was adopted for analysis. Results: A total of eleven RCTs and eleven Non-RCTs involving 12,796 patients were included in our study, whose intervening measures contained three major types of COVID-19 medicine, ACEI/ARB, antiviral medicine and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Compared to control group, COVID-19 medicine has the obvious advantage in reducing discharge rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29, p<0. 05) and clinical improvement rate (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26, p<0. 05), no distinct effect on mortality (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.17, p=0. 24). In addition, the serious adverse events rate (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88, p<0. 05) of COVID-19 medicine is lower than control group. Among different types of medicine, significant benefits in lowering the mortality seem to only occur in antiviral medicine. Conclusion: The results indicated antiviral medicine was potential drug of first choice recommended for COVID-19 treatment. Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine therapy was not recommended for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, the ACEI/ARB could be adopted for COVID-19 treatment when combined with standard treatment.","PeriodicalId":86002,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the School of Medicine (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the School of Medicine (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-89225/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread almost all regions of the world and caused great loss to the whole body of mankind. Thus, numerous clinical trials were conducted to find specific medicine for COVID-19 recently. However, it remains unanswered whether they are beneficial. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the COVID-19 medicine. Methods: Studies were determined through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Medline. The clinical trials of COVID-19 medicine were involved with eligible end points containing mortality, discharge rate, rate of clinical improvement and rate of serious adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) was adopted for variables as effect magnitude with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the random‐effects model was adopted for analysis. Results: A total of eleven RCTs and eleven Non-RCTs involving 12,796 patients were included in our study, whose intervening measures contained three major types of COVID-19 medicine, ACEI/ARB, antiviral medicine and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Compared to control group, COVID-19 medicine has the obvious advantage in reducing discharge rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29, p<0. 05) and clinical improvement rate (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26, p<0. 05), no distinct effect on mortality (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.17, p=0. 24). In addition, the serious adverse events rate (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88, p<0. 05) of COVID-19 medicine is lower than control group. Among different types of medicine, significant benefits in lowering the mortality seem to only occur in antiviral medicine. Conclusion: The results indicated antiviral medicine was potential drug of first choice recommended for COVID-19 treatment. Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine therapy was not recommended for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, the ACEI/ARB could be adopted for COVID-19 treatment when combined with standard treatment.
新冠肺炎药物的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已经蔓延到世界几乎所有地区,给全人类造成了巨大损失。因此,最近进行了大量临床试验,以寻找针对新冠病毒的特异性药物。然而,它们是否有益仍然没有答案。目的:评价新型冠状病毒肺炎药物的有效性和安全性。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Medline进行研究筛选。纳入COVID-19药物临床试验,符合条件的终点包括死亡率、出院率、临床改善率和严重不良事件发生率。变量效应大小采用风险比(RR),置信区间为95%,分析采用随机效应模型。结果:共纳入11项随机对照试验和11项非随机对照试验,共纳入12796例患者,干预措施包括3大类COVID-19药物,ACEI/ARB、抗病毒药物和氯喹/羟氯喹。与对照组相比,COVID-19药物在降低出院率方面具有明显优势(RR, 1.18;95% CI, 1.07 ~ 1.29, p<0。05)和临床改善率(RR, 1.15;95% CI, 1.05 ~ 1.26, p<0。0.05),对死亡率无显著影响(RR, 0.79;95% CI为0.53 ~ 1.17,p=0。24)。严重不良事件发生率(RR, 0.74;95% CI, 0.62 ~ 0.88, p<0。(05)新冠肺炎药物治疗效果低于对照组。在不同类型的药物中,降低死亡率的显著效益似乎只出现在抗病毒药物中。结论:抗病毒药物是COVID-19治疗的潜在首选推荐药物。不建议对COVID-19患者使用氯喹/羟氯喹治疗。此外,ACEI/ARB可与标准治疗联合用于COVID-19治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信