Fungal pathogens of mango (Mangifera indica L.) inflorescences

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
L. Rivera-Vargas, Manuel Pérez-Cuevas, Irma Cabrera-Asencio, M. R. Suárez-Rozo, Luz M. Serrato-Díaz
{"title":"Fungal pathogens of mango (Mangifera indica L.) inflorescences","authors":"L. Rivera-Vargas, Manuel Pérez-Cuevas, Irma Cabrera-Asencio, M. R. Suárez-Rozo, Luz M. Serrato-Díaz","doi":"10.46429/JAUPR.V104I2.19039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first comprehensive study to identify fungal pathogens of mango (Mangifera indica L.) inflorescences in Puerto Rico. A total of 452 mango inflorescences were collected from four cultivars at seven developmental stages during two blooming seasons. Samples were gathered from the germplasm collection at the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico in Juana Díaz, Puerto Rico. Eight different symptoms were observed: cankers, flower abortion, powdery mildew, rachis necrotic lesions, rachis soft rot, tip blight, vascular wilt, and insect perforations with necrotic borders. Necrosis was the most prevalent symptom (47%), followed by powdery mildew (19%) and tip blight (6%). Symptoms of malformation were never observed in the field. Using a modified Horsfall and Barratt scale, data on all mango cultivars pooled from two blooming seasons showed that the full bloom stage, the last inflorescence developmental stage (G), displayed the highest mean disease severity (42.67%). This severity value was significantly higher than those of the other developmental stages evaluated (P<0.05). Early inflorescence developmental stages were asymptomatic or showed the lowest percentage of disease severity. An ANOVA was performed to compare disease severity among all mango cultivars regardless of developmental stage. Results showed that there were significant differences (P<0.05) between mean disease severity of cultivars ‘Parvin’ and ‘Haden’. Mean disease severity was higher in ‘Haden’ (20%) when compared to ‘Parvin’ (10.7%). There were no statistical differences in mean disease severity between cultivars ‘Irwin’, ‘Keitt’ and ‘Parvin’, or between ‘Irwin’, ‘Haden’ and ‘Keitt’. In addition to the powdery mildew caused by Pseudoidium anacardii, 26 genera of fungi, mainly of Ascomycetes, 1Manuscript submitted to Editorial Board 18 June 2019. 2This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project H-425. The authors thank agronomists Víctor M. González, Luis E. Collazo and Lorena L. Simbaña for their assistance in the development of this research. 3Professor, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto RicoMayagüez, Mayagüez, P.R. 00680; e-mail: lydiai.rivera@upr.edu. 4Ex-graduate student, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. 5Professor, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, Juana Díaz, P.R. 0079. 6Research Associate, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. 7Research Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS-Tropical Agriculture Research Station, 2200 P.A. Campos Avenue Ste. 201, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00680-5470. 140 RiveRa-vaRgas et al./Fungi oF Mango inFloRescences were identified from a total of 569 fungal isolates, from symptomatic and asymptomatic inflorescences. The most common fungi were: Diaporthe spp. (29%), followed by members of the Botryosphaeriaceae (16%), Curvularia spp. (11%) and Fusarium spp. (11%). Many fungal pathogens identified in this study were isolated from asymptomatic tissue, occurring as endophytes or latent pathogens: A. alternata, various members of the Botryosphaeriaceae, C. gloeosporioides complex, Cladosporium spp. and F. decemcellulare. Thus, the use of protectant fungicides will not be as effective as systemics in their control. Correct identification of fungal pathogens affecting mango inflorescences is important when quarantine regulations are applied. In addition, this information will facilitate the development of better management strategies in mango orchards.","PeriodicalId":14937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","volume":"7 1","pages":"139-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46429/JAUPR.V104I2.19039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the first comprehensive study to identify fungal pathogens of mango (Mangifera indica L.) inflorescences in Puerto Rico. A total of 452 mango inflorescences were collected from four cultivars at seven developmental stages during two blooming seasons. Samples were gathered from the germplasm collection at the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico in Juana Díaz, Puerto Rico. Eight different symptoms were observed: cankers, flower abortion, powdery mildew, rachis necrotic lesions, rachis soft rot, tip blight, vascular wilt, and insect perforations with necrotic borders. Necrosis was the most prevalent symptom (47%), followed by powdery mildew (19%) and tip blight (6%). Symptoms of malformation were never observed in the field. Using a modified Horsfall and Barratt scale, data on all mango cultivars pooled from two blooming seasons showed that the full bloom stage, the last inflorescence developmental stage (G), displayed the highest mean disease severity (42.67%). This severity value was significantly higher than those of the other developmental stages evaluated (P<0.05). Early inflorescence developmental stages were asymptomatic or showed the lowest percentage of disease severity. An ANOVA was performed to compare disease severity among all mango cultivars regardless of developmental stage. Results showed that there were significant differences (P<0.05) between mean disease severity of cultivars ‘Parvin’ and ‘Haden’. Mean disease severity was higher in ‘Haden’ (20%) when compared to ‘Parvin’ (10.7%). There were no statistical differences in mean disease severity between cultivars ‘Irwin’, ‘Keitt’ and ‘Parvin’, or between ‘Irwin’, ‘Haden’ and ‘Keitt’. In addition to the powdery mildew caused by Pseudoidium anacardii, 26 genera of fungi, mainly of Ascomycetes, 1Manuscript submitted to Editorial Board 18 June 2019. 2This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project H-425. The authors thank agronomists Víctor M. González, Luis E. Collazo and Lorena L. Simbaña for their assistance in the development of this research. 3Professor, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto RicoMayagüez, Mayagüez, P.R. 00680; e-mail: lydiai.rivera@upr.edu. 4Ex-graduate student, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. 5Professor, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, Juana Díaz, P.R. 0079. 6Research Associate, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. 7Research Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS-Tropical Agriculture Research Station, 2200 P.A. Campos Avenue Ste. 201, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00680-5470. 140 RiveRa-vaRgas et al./Fungi oF Mango inFloRescences were identified from a total of 569 fungal isolates, from symptomatic and asymptomatic inflorescences. The most common fungi were: Diaporthe spp. (29%), followed by members of the Botryosphaeriaceae (16%), Curvularia spp. (11%) and Fusarium spp. (11%). Many fungal pathogens identified in this study were isolated from asymptomatic tissue, occurring as endophytes or latent pathogens: A. alternata, various members of the Botryosphaeriaceae, C. gloeosporioides complex, Cladosporium spp. and F. decemcellulare. Thus, the use of protectant fungicides will not be as effective as systemics in their control. Correct identification of fungal pathogens affecting mango inflorescences is important when quarantine regulations are applied. In addition, this information will facilitate the development of better management strategies in mango orchards.
芒果(Mangifera indica L.)花序真菌病原菌
这是首次在波多黎各鉴定芒果(Mangifera indica L.)花序真菌病原体的综合研究。在两个开花季节,收集了4个品种7个发育阶段的452个芒果花序。样本从波多黎各胡安娜Díaz的波多黎各大学农业实验站的种质收集中收集。观察到8种不同的症状:溃疡病、花流产、白粉病、轴坏死性病变、轴软腐病、尖端枯萎病、血管枯萎病和带坏死边界的昆虫穿孔。坏死是最常见的症状(47%),其次是白粉病(19%)和叶枯病(6%)。在现场从未观察到畸形症状。利用改良的Horsfall和Barratt量表,收集了两个开花季节的所有芒果品种的数据,结果表明,盛开期(花序发育的最后阶段)的平均疾病严重程度最高(42.67%)。该严重程度值显著高于其他发育阶段(P<0.05)。早期花序发育阶段无症状或疾病严重程度百分比最低。采用方差分析比较不同发育阶段所有芒果品种的疾病严重程度。结果表明,‘Parvin’和‘Haden’品种的平均病害严重程度差异显著(P<0.05)。“Haden”的平均疾病严重程度(20%)高于“Parvin”(10.7%)。栽培品种' Irwin '、' Keitt '和' Parvin '之间,或' Irwin '、' Haden '和' Keitt '之间的平均疾病严重程度无统计学差异。除由假丝胞菌引起的白粉病外,还有26属真菌,主要是子囊菌,1稿提交编委会2019年6月18日。这项工作得到了美国农业部国家食品和农业研究所H-425项目的支持。作者感谢农学家Víctor M. González、Luis E. Collazo和Lorena L. Simbaña对这项研究发展的帮助。3波多黎各大学农业环境科学系教授,波多黎各玛雅 ez,波多黎各00680;电子邮件:lydiai.rivera@upr.edu。4波多黎各大学农业环境科学系研究生。5波多黎各大学农业环境科学系教授,农业实验站,胡安娜Díaz, P.R. 0079。6波多黎各大学农业环境科学系研究助理,波多黎各;7美国农业部热带农业研究站植物病理学研究中心,波多黎各马亚 ez市坎波斯大道201街2200号,00680-5470。140 RiveRa-vaRgas等人/芒果花序真菌从有症状和无症状花序中共分离出569株真菌。最常见的真菌是:Diaporthe spp.(29%),其次是Botryosphaeriaceae成员(16%),曲霉属(11%)和镰刀菌属(11%)。本研究中发现的许多真菌病原体都是从无症状组织中分离出来的,以内生菌或潜伏病原体的形式出现:A. alternata, botryosphaeriiaceae的各种成员,C. gloeosporioides复合体,Cladosporium spp.和F. decemcellulare。因此,使用保护性杀菌剂在控制真菌方面不如使用系统性杀菌剂有效。在实施检疫规定时,正确鉴定影响芒果花序的真菌病原体非常重要。此外,这些信息将有助于制定更好的芒果果园管理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico issued biannually by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, for the publication of articles and research notes by staff members or others, dealing with scientific agriculture in Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信