Mitral repair or bioprosthetic replacement for rheumatic valve drseascs in elderly patients

Baiyu Tian, Jie Han, Yan Li, Yuqing Jiao, Xu Meng
{"title":"Mitral repair or bioprosthetic replacement for rheumatic valve drseascs in elderly patients","authors":"Baiyu Tian, Jie Han, Yan Li, Yuqing Jiao, Xu Meng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2020.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nMitral valve replacement is more frequently performed in elder patients with rheumatic valve diseases. Mitral valve repair may be feasible in young patients with suitable anatomy in rheumatic mitral valve disease, but still controversial in elder patients. Our study was to compare mitral repair to bioprosthetic replacement in patients aged 60 years or older. \n \n \nMethods \nEighty two patients(age ≥60 years) underwent mitral valve surgery(mitral repair or bioprosthetic replacement)in our single institution from January 2014 to January 2016 were reviewed, including 25 cases of repair(MVP) and 57 cases of bioprosthetic replacement(MVR). 5 years follow-up oganalysis. \n \n \nResults \nMean age in MVP and MVR was 64.43 years and 67.28 years, respectively. There were no statistically differences in extracorporeal circulation time(P=0.99) and aorta blocking time(P=0.88); the operative mortality rate in MVR was 5.3% while none in MVP(P=0.24). During follow-up 6 deaths happened in MVR, 4 of them died from MACE while the other 2 died from other causes. There was no death in MVP(P=0.17). No redo or other complications were found during follow-up. \n \n \nConclusion \nIn patients aged 60 years or older with rheumatic mitral valve disease, mitral repair is associated with a same perioperative and mid-term result compared with bioprosthetic replacement. Rheumatic mitral valves could be repaired in elderly patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nMitral valve insafficiency; Mitral valve repair; Bioprosthesis; Elderly","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2020.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Mitral valve replacement is more frequently performed in elder patients with rheumatic valve diseases. Mitral valve repair may be feasible in young patients with suitable anatomy in rheumatic mitral valve disease, but still controversial in elder patients. Our study was to compare mitral repair to bioprosthetic replacement in patients aged 60 years or older. Methods Eighty two patients(age ≥60 years) underwent mitral valve surgery(mitral repair or bioprosthetic replacement)in our single institution from January 2014 to January 2016 were reviewed, including 25 cases of repair(MVP) and 57 cases of bioprosthetic replacement(MVR). 5 years follow-up oganalysis. Results Mean age in MVP and MVR was 64.43 years and 67.28 years, respectively. There were no statistically differences in extracorporeal circulation time(P=0.99) and aorta blocking time(P=0.88); the operative mortality rate in MVR was 5.3% while none in MVP(P=0.24). During follow-up 6 deaths happened in MVR, 4 of them died from MACE while the other 2 died from other causes. There was no death in MVP(P=0.17). No redo or other complications were found during follow-up. Conclusion In patients aged 60 years or older with rheumatic mitral valve disease, mitral repair is associated with a same perioperative and mid-term result compared with bioprosthetic replacement. Rheumatic mitral valves could be repaired in elderly patients. Key words: Mitral valve insafficiency; Mitral valve repair; Bioprosthesis; Elderly
二尖瓣修复或生物假体置换治疗老年风湿性瓣膜病
目的二尖瓣置换术在老年风湿性瓣膜疾病患者中更为常见。风湿二尖瓣病变的年轻患者解剖结构合适,二尖瓣修复是可行的,但对老年患者仍有争议。我们的研究是比较60岁或以上患者的二尖瓣修复和生物假体置换术。方法回顾性分析我院2014年1月至2016年1月收治的82例(年龄≥60岁)二尖瓣手术(二尖瓣修复或生物假体置换术)患者,其中修复(MVP) 25例,生物假体置换术(MVR) 57例。5年随访分析。结果MVP和MVR的平均年龄分别为64.43岁和67.28岁。两组体外循环时间(P=0.99)、主动脉阻塞时间(P=0.88)差异无统计学意义;MVR组手术死亡率为5.3%,MVP组无手术死亡率(P=0.24)。随访期间MVR共发生6例死亡,其中MACE死亡4例,其他原因死亡2例。MVP组无死亡(P=0.17)。随访期间无重做及其他并发症。结论在60岁及以上风湿性二尖瓣疾病患者中,与生物假体置换术相比,二尖瓣修复术的围手术期和中期结果相同。老年患者风湿性二尖瓣可修复。关键词:二尖瓣功能不全;二尖瓣修复;Bioprosthesis;上了年纪的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信