The inspiratory activity of respiratory center and respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19

Q4 Medicine
O. Savushkina, A. A. Zaicev, E. Kryukov, P. Astanin, N. A. Aseeva, M. Malashenko, O. Fesenko
{"title":"The inspiratory activity of respiratory center and respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19","authors":"O. Savushkina, A. A. Zaicev, E. Kryukov, P. Astanin, N. A. Aseeva, M. Malashenko, O. Fesenko","doi":"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-1-27-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles.The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019).Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age – 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale.Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 – P0.1 ≤ 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 – > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters.Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.","PeriodicalId":37383,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonologiya","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-1-27-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles.The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019).Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age – 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale.Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 – P0.1 ≤ 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 – > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters.Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.
新型冠状病毒感染后呼吸中枢吸气活动及呼吸肌力量的变化
提供肺通气的呼吸泵包括呼吸中枢、周围神经系统、胸部和呼吸肌。本研究的目的是评估COVID-19(冠状病毒病2019)后呼吸中枢活动和呼吸肌力量。观察性回顾性横断面研究包括74例covid -19后患者(56例(76%)男性,中位年龄- 48岁)。测量肺活量、体体积脉搏波、肺弥散量(DLCO)、最大吸气和呼气压(MIP和MEP)、0.1秒后气道闭塞压(P0.1)。此外,使用mMRC量表评估31例患者的呼吸困难,并使用MRC无力量表评估其中27例患者的肌肉力量。从COVID-19发病到肺功能检查(pft)的中位时间为120天。总样本分为2个亚组:1 - P0.1≤0.15 kPa (norm), 2 - > 0.15 kPa。大多数患者的肺容量、气道阻力、MIP和MEP均在正常值范围内,而总样本和亚组中59%的病例DLCO均降低。轻度呼吸困难和肌肉力量轻微下降也被检测到。亚组2肺容量(低)和气道阻力(高)两组间差异有统计学意义。相关分析显示P0.1与通气参数呈中度负相关。测量P0.1是一种简单、无创的评估肺功能的方法。在我们的研究中,45%的covid -19后病例中检测到P0.1升高,这可能是由于肺力学受损,尽管肺通气保持正常,MIP和MEP值也正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonologiya
Pulmonologiya Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to state a scientific position of the Russian Respiratory Society (RRS) on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases based on recent evidence-based clinical trial publications and international consensuses. The most important tasks of the journal are: -improvement proficiency qualifications of respiratory specialists; -education in pulmonology; -prompt publication of original studies on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases; -sharing clinical experience and information about pulmonology service organization in different regions of Russia; -information on current protocols, standards and recommendations of international respiratory societies; -discussion and consequent publication Russian consensus documents and announcement of RRS activities; -publication and comments of regulatory documents of Russian Ministry of Health; -historical review of Russian pulmonology development. The scientific concept of the journal includes publication of current evidence-based studies on respiratory medicine and their discussion with the participation of Russian and foreign experts and development of national consensus documents on respiratory medicine. Russian and foreign respiratory specialists including pneumologists, TB specialists, thoracic surgeons, allergists, clinical immunologists, pediatricians, oncologists, physiologists, and therapeutists are invited to publish article in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信