Comparison of Antigenicity Between Local and Massachusetts Strains of Infectious Bronchitis Virus using Indirect ELISA Test

J. Rahmahani, Daniswara Irwanza Akbar, S. Suwarno
{"title":"Comparison of Antigenicity Between Local and Massachusetts Strains of Infectious Bronchitis Virus using Indirect ELISA Test","authors":"J. Rahmahani, Daniswara Irwanza Akbar, S. Suwarno","doi":"10.20473/jmv.vol5.iss1.2022.28-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the antigenicity between the whole virus and protein S of both local strain I-147 and Massachusetts strain of Infectious bronchitis virus with indirect ELISA. We used 10 positive serums from post vaccinated chickens for further reaction with four groups of antigens in this study that are: P1) S protein (spike glycoprotein) antigen of local strain IB virus; P2) S protein (spike glycoprotein) antigen of Massachusetts strain IB virus; P3) whole virus antigen of local strain IB virus; P4) whole virus antigen of Massachusetts strain IB virus. The results of this research are Optical Density (OD) values of each treatment, then to be analyzed using One Way ANOVA and followed by Duncan Multiple Range Test 5%. The results show that there are differences between the antigenicity of the whole virus and S protein in both local strain and Massachusetts strain of IB virus. The whole virus antigen of both strains has a significant difference (p<0.05) with the S protein antigen in both strains. Specifically, the whole virus antigen of Massachusetts strain has the highest OD among the other groups.","PeriodicalId":17972,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Medik Veteriner","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Medik Veteriner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol5.iss1.2022.28-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the antigenicity between the whole virus and protein S of both local strain I-147 and Massachusetts strain of Infectious bronchitis virus with indirect ELISA. We used 10 positive serums from post vaccinated chickens for further reaction with four groups of antigens in this study that are: P1) S protein (spike glycoprotein) antigen of local strain IB virus; P2) S protein (spike glycoprotein) antigen of Massachusetts strain IB virus; P3) whole virus antigen of local strain IB virus; P4) whole virus antigen of Massachusetts strain IB virus. The results of this research are Optical Density (OD) values of each treatment, then to be analyzed using One Way ANOVA and followed by Duncan Multiple Range Test 5%. The results show that there are differences between the antigenicity of the whole virus and S protein in both local strain and Massachusetts strain of IB virus. The whole virus antigen of both strains has a significant difference (p<0.05) with the S protein antigen in both strains. Specifically, the whole virus antigen of Massachusetts strain has the highest OD among the other groups.
间接ELISA检测传染性支气管炎本地株与麻州株抗原性的比较
本研究的目的是用间接ELISA法比较传染性支气管炎本地株I-147和马萨诸塞州株全病毒和蛋白S的抗原性。在本研究中,我们用接种后的10只鸡的阳性血清与四组抗原进行进一步反应:P1)本地株IB病毒S蛋白(刺突糖蛋白)抗原;麻州株IB病毒P2) S蛋白(刺突糖蛋白)抗原;P3)本地株IB病毒全病毒抗原;麻州IB病毒株全病毒抗原。本研究结果为各处理的光密度(OD)值,采用单因素方差分析(One Way ANOVA)进行分析,并采用Duncan多元极差检验5%进行分析。结果表明,IB病毒本地株和麻州株的全病毒抗原性和S蛋白抗原性存在差异。两株的全病毒抗原与S蛋白抗原差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。其中,麻州毒株的全病毒抗原OD值在其他毒株中最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信