Editor's Note

Red Washburn, Dayo F. Gore, Christina B. Hanhardt, Adria L. Imada, L. Gutterman, Robert Thomas Choflet, Amina Zarrugh, S. C. Kaplan, Christina Heatherton, Ren-yo Hwang, J. Jones, Rosemary Ndubuizu, Vani Kannan, Lenora R. Knowles, Tiana U. Wilson, R. Ferguson, Zifeng Liu, J. Pegues, Barbara Ransby, Alan Pelaez Lopez, L. Duggan
{"title":"Editor's Note","authors":"Red Washburn, Dayo F. Gore, Christina B. Hanhardt, Adria L. Imada, L. Gutterman, Robert Thomas Choflet, Amina Zarrugh, S. C. Kaplan, Christina Heatherton, Ren-yo Hwang, J. Jones, Rosemary Ndubuizu, Vani Kannan, Lenora R. Knowles, Tiana U. Wilson, R. Ferguson, Zifeng Liu, J. Pegues, Barbara Ransby, Alan Pelaez Lopez, L. Duggan","doi":"10.4038/jdza.v8i1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The mass incarceration of more than 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II has usually been assessed in terms of devastating economic and property losses, racist profiling, and the abrogation of constitutional rights. However, survivors also claimed incarceration as an experience of individual and collective disablement. In a break from decorum, survivors testified about a range of mental and physical disabilities at the U.S. Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians Hearings (CWRIC) held across the United States in 1981. This article discusses how a grassroots redress movement for government restitution brought the experiences of disabled, chronically ill, and mad people into the Commission hearings. Informed by 1960s-1970s Asian American and Third World Women's movements, intergenerational redress organizing transmitted and amplified the subjugated knowledge of disabled survivors. These efforts to involve ordinary people in redress produced an unanticipated yet profound record of what I call carceral disability: the aggregate disabling effects of mass incarceration and state violence. I further deliberate on the unresolvable ambiguities and ongoing anticarceral legacies of the Redress Movement.","PeriodicalId":23857,"journal":{"name":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","volume":"8 1","pages":"10 - 11 - 115 - 117 - 130 - 133 - 140 - 141 - 154 - 155 - 167 - 169 - 17 - 180 - 182 - 184 - 185 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jdza.v8i1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The mass incarceration of more than 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II has usually been assessed in terms of devastating economic and property losses, racist profiling, and the abrogation of constitutional rights. However, survivors also claimed incarceration as an experience of individual and collective disablement. In a break from decorum, survivors testified about a range of mental and physical disabilities at the U.S. Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians Hearings (CWRIC) held across the United States in 1981. This article discusses how a grassroots redress movement for government restitution brought the experiences of disabled, chronically ill, and mad people into the Commission hearings. Informed by 1960s-1970s Asian American and Third World Women's movements, intergenerational redress organizing transmitted and amplified the subjugated knowledge of disabled survivors. These efforts to involve ordinary people in redress produced an unanticipated yet profound record of what I call carceral disability: the aggregate disabling effects of mass incarceration and state violence. I further deliberate on the unresolvable ambiguities and ongoing anticarceral legacies of the Redress Movement.
编者按
摘要:二战期间对12万多日裔美国人的大规模监禁通常从经济和财产损失、种族主义定性和宪法权利的废除等方面进行评估。然而,幸存者也声称监禁是一种个人和集体残疾的经历。1981年,在美国各地举行的美国战时安置和拘留平民委员会听证会(CWRIC)上,幸存者打破了礼仪,就一系列精神和身体残疾作证。这篇文章讨论了一个要求政府赔偿的草根运动是如何将残疾人、慢性病患者和疯子的经历带入委员会听证会的。受20世纪60年代至70年代亚裔美国人和第三世界妇女运动的影响,代际救济组织传播并扩大了残疾幸存者被征服的知识。这些让普通人参与补救的努力产生了一种意想不到的,但却深刻的记录,我称之为监禁残疾:大规模监禁和国家暴力的综合残疾影响。我进一步审议了纠正运动的无法解决的含糊不清和目前的反暴力遗留问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信