The effect of water aging on the repair shear bond strength of current resin composites

T. Kölüş, AyseCanan Tutku Çelik, HEsra Ülker
{"title":"The effect of water aging on the repair shear bond strength of current resin composites","authors":"T. Kölüş, AyseCanan Tutku Çelik, HEsra Ülker","doi":"10.4103/jid.jid_2_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: We aimed to examine if water aging changes the repair bond strength of currently available resin composites. Subjects and Methods: Charisma (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), Essentia (GC, Tokyo, Japan), and CeramX (Dentsply Sirona, North Carolina, USA) resin composites were prepared within acrylic resin cylinders (n = 22). The surfaces of all samples were polished with OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA), and G-Premio BOND (GC, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to the surfaces. The G-aenial (GC, Tokyo, Japan) resin composite was formed on the adhesive-applied surface aided by a Teflon mold with a diameter of 2.38 mm and height of 2 mm and then polymerized with a LED light source (VALO Cordless, Standard mode; Ultradent, Utah, USA) for 20 s. All samples were kept in water for 1 day. To determine the shear bond strength, a universal test device (Marestek, İstanbul, Turkey) with a knife-edged metal tip was used at a speed of 1 mm/min. For the experimental group, the composite surfaces of the same samples were sanded with 180-grit silicon carbide sandpaper and then polished with OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA). Samples were then kept in water for 6 months. Adhesive repair resin composite and shear test applications were performed similarly to the control group. Paired sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference tests were performed for statistical analysis. For statistical significance, P < 0.05 was accepted. Results: We observed repair shear bond strength values of 7.88 ± 3.20 MPa for Charisma versus 5.64 ± 3.08 MPa aged Charisma, 7.65 ± 2.64 MPa for Essentia versus 5.67 ± 3.10 MPa for aged Essentia, and 7.07 ± 3.22 MPa for CeramX versus 4.80 ± 2.28 for MPa aged CeramX. There was no difference within control groups nor in aged groups (P > 0.05). However, bond strength was lower in aged composites (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The repair bond strength of current resin composites decreases after 6 months of water aging.","PeriodicalId":14017,"journal":{"name":"International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry","volume":"27 1","pages":"68 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jid.jid_2_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to examine if water aging changes the repair bond strength of currently available resin composites. Subjects and Methods: Charisma (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), Essentia (GC, Tokyo, Japan), and CeramX (Dentsply Sirona, North Carolina, USA) resin composites were prepared within acrylic resin cylinders (n = 22). The surfaces of all samples were polished with OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA), and G-Premio BOND (GC, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to the surfaces. The G-aenial (GC, Tokyo, Japan) resin composite was formed on the adhesive-applied surface aided by a Teflon mold with a diameter of 2.38 mm and height of 2 mm and then polymerized with a LED light source (VALO Cordless, Standard mode; Ultradent, Utah, USA) for 20 s. All samples were kept in water for 1 day. To determine the shear bond strength, a universal test device (Marestek, İstanbul, Turkey) with a knife-edged metal tip was used at a speed of 1 mm/min. For the experimental group, the composite surfaces of the same samples were sanded with 180-grit silicon carbide sandpaper and then polished with OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA). Samples were then kept in water for 6 months. Adhesive repair resin composite and shear test applications were performed similarly to the control group. Paired sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference tests were performed for statistical analysis. For statistical significance, P < 0.05 was accepted. Results: We observed repair shear bond strength values of 7.88 ± 3.20 MPa for Charisma versus 5.64 ± 3.08 MPa aged Charisma, 7.65 ± 2.64 MPa for Essentia versus 5.67 ± 3.10 MPa for aged Essentia, and 7.07 ± 3.22 MPa for CeramX versus 4.80 ± 2.28 for MPa aged CeramX. There was no difference within control groups nor in aged groups (P > 0.05). However, bond strength was lower in aged composites (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The repair bond strength of current resin composites decreases after 6 months of water aging.
水老化对现有树脂复合材料修复剪切粘接强度的影响
目的:研究水老化是否会改变现有树脂复合材料的修复结合强度。对象和方法:在丙烯酸树脂筒内制备了Charisma (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany)、Essentia (GC, Tokyo, Japan)和CeramX (Dentsply Sirona, North Carolina, USA)树脂复合材料(n = 22)。所有样品的表面用OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA)抛光,G-Premio BOND (GC, Tokyo, Japan)涂于表面。G-aenial (GC, Tokyo, Japan)树脂复合材料在直径2.38 mm,高度2 mm的Teflon模具辅助下在涂胶表面形成,然后在LED光源(VALO Cordless, Standard mode;Ultradent,犹他州,美国)20秒。所有样品在水中保存1天。为了确定剪切粘接强度,使用一种通用测试装置(Marestek, İstanbul,土耳其),其刀尖为锋利的金属,速度为1mm /min。实验组用180粒碳化硅砂纸打磨相同样品的复合表面,然后用OptiDisc (Kerr, California, USA)抛光。然后将样品在水中保存6个月。胶粘剂修复树脂复合材料和剪切试验应用的方法与对照组相似。采用配对样本t检验、单因素方差分析和事后Tukey’s honest显著性差异检验进行统计分析。以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:我们观察到修复剪切粘接强度值为:卡玛斯卡(Charisma)为7.88±3.20 MPa,卡玛斯卡(Charisma)为5.64±3.08 MPa,卡玛斯卡(Essentia)为7.65±2.64 MPa,卡玛斯卡(Essentia)为5.67±3.10 MPa, CeramX为7.07±3.22 MPa,卡玛斯卡(CeramX)为4.80±2.28 MPa。对照组和老龄组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。老化后复合材料的粘结强度降低(P < 0.05)。结论:当前树脂复合材料在水老化6个月后修复粘结强度下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书