Carola Richter, Abdulrahman Al-Shami, S. Khalīfa, Soheir A. Osman, Samuel Mundua
{"title":"The virus of the ‘others’? Corona and discursive othering in Arab media","authors":"Carola Richter, Abdulrahman Al-Shami, S. Khalīfa, Soheir A. Osman, Samuel Mundua","doi":"10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of fear of the coronavirus and related insecurities around the pandemic have fuelled nationalist and increased exclusionary tendencies in countries all over the world. In North America, for instance, anti-Asian racism increased when former US President Donald Trump dubbed the virus the ‘Chinese virus’. A nationalist agenda has been strengthened in many places, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region;and hateful narratives blaming ‘others’ for the pandemic, legitimizing a retreat to the protection of national borders and policies, are being spread in different media outlets. This article comparatively investigates processes of othering with regard to COVID-19 in four MENA countries – Egypt, Iraq, Oman and Yemen – and asks, who is held responsible for the coronavirus crisis in different countries? How is othering revealed in media coverage related to COVID-19? What (in)sensitive language can be identified? The study looks at mass media coverage at the peak of the global lockdown during the spring of 2020. The media analysis reveals a strong emphasis on mostly national identities as articulated lines of demarcation in all four cases. A homogenizing and demonizing othering was detected in particular in the cases of Yemen and Egypt, but also Iraq, when blame was attributed to political adversaries. The Omani case was characterized by a more subtle othering that focused strongly on the importance of citizenship. © 2021 Intellect Ltd Article. English language.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"3-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
“其他人”的病毒?阿拉伯媒体中的科罗娜与话语性他人
对冠状病毒的恐惧蔓延以及围绕大流行的相关不安全感,助长了世界各国的民族主义,加剧了排斥倾向。例如,在北美,当美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普将这种病毒称为“中国病毒”时,反亚洲种族主义加剧。民族主义议程在包括中东和北非地区在内的许多地方得到加强;各种媒体正在传播将疫情归咎于“他人”的仇恨言论,使退回到保护国家边界和政策的做法合法化。本文比较调查了埃及、伊拉克、阿曼和也门四个中东和北非国家应对新冠肺炎疫情的处理过程,并提出了一个问题:在不同的国家,谁应该为新冠肺炎危机负责?与COVID-19相关的媒体报道如何披露其他人?哪些敏感语言可以被识别?该研究着眼于2020年春季全球封锁高峰期的大众媒体报道。媒体分析显示,在所有四个案例中,主要强调国家身份是明确的分界线。在也门和埃及的情况下,特别是在伊拉克的情况下,当指责归咎于政治对手时,发现了一种同质化和妖魔化他人的情况。阿曼案件的特点是一个更加微妙的问题,强烈强调公民身份的重要性。©2021 Intellect Ltd文章。英语语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。