Evaluation of the nephroprotective strategy effectiveness in the late stages of chronic kidney disease

D. Sadovskaya, K. A. Vishnevsky, I. N. Konakova, Olga R. Golubeva, N. V. Bakulina
{"title":"Evaluation of the nephroprotective strategy effectiveness in the late stages of chronic kidney disease","authors":"D. Sadovskaya, K. A. Vishnevsky, I. N. Konakova, Olga R. Golubeva, N. V. Bakulina","doi":"10.17816/mechnikov119586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Classical nephroprotection reduces its effectiveness at the late CKD stages; the search for effective algorithms is hampered by accelerating decline in GFR, therefore there are no generally accepted ways to evaluate the effectiveness. \nAim: to build a model for predicting the GFR decline rate in order to assess the effectiveness of the intensive follow-up. \nMethods. A representative group of regular follow-up (N=540) was allocated from the city database (N=7696) to built-up the polynomial model that predicts GFR annual decline. We used the model to evaluate the intensive monitoring effectiveness (N=100) by the difference between predicted and actual rates of GFR decline. We also selected well matched subgroup of 200 patients for direct comparison of hard and surrogate outcomes. \nResults. During last year before need in dialysis, the rate of GFR decline in intensive group was 5.981.69 vs. the predicted 9.060.59ml/min/1.73 m/year. We used that assessment of the intervention effectiveness as dependent variable in regression and categorical analysis. The significant components of the nephroprotection: phosphatemia decrease (0.25 mmol/l), hemoglobin increase (1 g/dl), effective administration of RAAS blockers (to reduce proteinuria by 0.1 g/l), systolic blood pressure decrease (5 mmHg), calcemia deviations decrease from the target (0.1 mmol/l), acidosis correction (2 mmol/l), inflammation reduction and albumin increase (1.5 g/l) -were associated with the smaller GFR decrease rate by 15%. In intensive group, the dialysis risk was 2.2 times lower, the death risk was 4 times. The only planned dialysis start was ensured in intensive group, 67% chose peritoneal dialysis. \nConclusions. The prediction of GFR decline rate calculated by nonlinear model in comparison with the actual one can evaluate the nephroprotection effectiveness; it differs significantly from the classical ones at the CKD late stages.","PeriodicalId":12949,"journal":{"name":"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov119586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Classical nephroprotection reduces its effectiveness at the late CKD stages; the search for effective algorithms is hampered by accelerating decline in GFR, therefore there are no generally accepted ways to evaluate the effectiveness. Aim: to build a model for predicting the GFR decline rate in order to assess the effectiveness of the intensive follow-up. Methods. A representative group of regular follow-up (N=540) was allocated from the city database (N=7696) to built-up the polynomial model that predicts GFR annual decline. We used the model to evaluate the intensive monitoring effectiveness (N=100) by the difference between predicted and actual rates of GFR decline. We also selected well matched subgroup of 200 patients for direct comparison of hard and surrogate outcomes. Results. During last year before need in dialysis, the rate of GFR decline in intensive group was 5.981.69 vs. the predicted 9.060.59ml/min/1.73 m/year. We used that assessment of the intervention effectiveness as dependent variable in regression and categorical analysis. The significant components of the nephroprotection: phosphatemia decrease (0.25 mmol/l), hemoglobin increase (1 g/dl), effective administration of RAAS blockers (to reduce proteinuria by 0.1 g/l), systolic blood pressure decrease (5 mmHg), calcemia deviations decrease from the target (0.1 mmol/l), acidosis correction (2 mmol/l), inflammation reduction and albumin increase (1.5 g/l) -were associated with the smaller GFR decrease rate by 15%. In intensive group, the dialysis risk was 2.2 times lower, the death risk was 4 times. The only planned dialysis start was ensured in intensive group, 67% chose peritoneal dialysis. Conclusions. The prediction of GFR decline rate calculated by nonlinear model in comparison with the actual one can evaluate the nephroprotection effectiveness; it differs significantly from the classical ones at the CKD late stages.
慢性肾病晚期肾保护策略的有效性评价
背景。经典的肾保护在CKD晚期降低了其有效性;寻找有效的算法受到GFR加速下降的阻碍,因此没有普遍接受的方法来评估有效性。目的:建立GFR下降率预测模型,以评价强化随访的有效性。方法。从城市数据库(N=7696)中抽取有代表性的定期随访组(N=540),建立预测GFR年下降的多项式模型。我们使用该模型通过预测和实际GFR下降率之间的差异来评估强化监测的有效性(N=100)。我们还选择了200例匹配良好的亚组患者,直接比较硬结局和替代结局。结果。在需要透析前的最后一年,强化组GFR下降率为5.981.69,而预测为9.060.59ml/min/1.73 m/年。我们在回归和分类分析中使用干预有效性评估作为因变量。肾保护的重要组成部分:磷血症降低(0.25 mmol/l),血红蛋白增加(1 g/dl), RAAS阻滞剂的有效使用(减少蛋白尿0.1 g/l),收缩压降低(5 mmHg),钙偏离目标(0.1 mmol/l),酸中毒纠正(2 mmol/l),炎症减少和白蛋白增加(1.5 g/l) -与GFR降低率降低15%相关。强化组透析风险降低2.2倍,死亡风险降低4倍。强化组只有计划透析开始,67%的患者选择腹膜透析。结论。将非线性模型计算的GFR下降率与实际预测结果进行比较,可以评价肾保护的效果;它与CKD晚期的经典方法有很大不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信