176 Did Hand Washing and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Reduce Transmission of Surgical Site Infections During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?

A. Hunt, H. Nasr, H. Willmott, P. Patel
{"title":"176 Did Hand Washing and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Reduce Transmission of Surgical Site Infections During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?","authors":"A. Hunt, H. Nasr, H. Willmott, P. Patel","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac040.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim A retrospective case-control study comparing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following primary hip and knee arthroplasty before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic across East Sussex NHS Trust (ESHT). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the government advice relating to increased vigilance surrounding hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) reduced SSIs following elective arthroplasty. Method Data was obtained from Public Health England website relating to SSIs following primary hip and knee arthroplasty between April 2019 and March 2020 (pre-pandemic) performed at ESHT and compared to April 2020 to March 2021 (pandemic). Results A total of 454 patients underwent a total hip replacement (THR) during the pre-pandemic period with 12 patients developing an SSI (2.6%). Comparatively, during the pandemic period, 146 patients underwent a THR with 4 reporting an SSI (2.7%). A total of 449 patients underwent a total knee replacement (TKR) during the pre-pandemic period with 11 reporting an SSI (2.5%). In contrast, 9 of the 138 patients undergoing a TKR during the pandemic group developed an SSI (6.5%). Conclusions As the data shows, there was no significant difference observed between SSIs following THR performed at ESHT prior to and during the pandemic. Surprisingly, there was a 2.6-fold increase in SSI following TKR during the pandemic period compared with pre-pandemic. Both of these findings seemingly reject the null hypothesis that increased vigilance to hand hygiene and use of PPE mandated by the government and echoed by healthcare trusts during this time would reduce transmission of infections.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac040.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim A retrospective case-control study comparing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following primary hip and knee arthroplasty before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic across East Sussex NHS Trust (ESHT). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the government advice relating to increased vigilance surrounding hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) reduced SSIs following elective arthroplasty. Method Data was obtained from Public Health England website relating to SSIs following primary hip and knee arthroplasty between April 2019 and March 2020 (pre-pandemic) performed at ESHT and compared to April 2020 to March 2021 (pandemic). Results A total of 454 patients underwent a total hip replacement (THR) during the pre-pandemic period with 12 patients developing an SSI (2.6%). Comparatively, during the pandemic period, 146 patients underwent a THR with 4 reporting an SSI (2.7%). A total of 449 patients underwent a total knee replacement (TKR) during the pre-pandemic period with 11 reporting an SSI (2.5%). In contrast, 9 of the 138 patients undergoing a TKR during the pandemic group developed an SSI (6.5%). Conclusions As the data shows, there was no significant difference observed between SSIs following THR performed at ESHT prior to and during the pandemic. Surprisingly, there was a 2.6-fold increase in SSI following TKR during the pandemic period compared with pre-pandemic. Both of these findings seemingly reject the null hypothesis that increased vigilance to hand hygiene and use of PPE mandated by the government and echoed by healthcare trusts during this time would reduce transmission of infections.
176在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,洗手和使用个人防护装备(PPE)能减少手术部位感染的传播吗?
摘要:目的回顾性病例对照研究,比较东苏塞克斯NHS信托基金(ESHT)在SARS-CoV-2大流行之前和期间原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术后手术部位感染(ssi)。本研究的目的是评估政府关于提高手部卫生警惕和使用个人防护装备(PPE)的建议是否减少了选择性关节置换术后的ssi。方法从英国公共卫生网站获得2019年4月至2020年3月(大流行前)在ESHT进行的原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术后ssi的相关数据,并与2020年4月至2021年3月(大流行)进行比较。结果在流感大流行前,共有454名患者接受了全髋关节置换术(THR),其中12名患者发生SSI(2.6%)。相比之下,在大流行期间,146例患者接受了THR,其中4例报告SSI(2.7%)。在大流行前期间,共有449例患者接受了全膝关节置换术(TKR),其中11例报告SSI(2.5%)。相比之下,大流行期间接受TKR的138例患者中有9例发生SSI(6.5%)。正如数据所示,在大流行之前和期间在ESHT进行THR后的ssi之间没有观察到显着差异。令人惊讶的是,在大流行期间,与大流行前相比,TKR后的SSI增加了2.6倍。这两项研究结果似乎都拒绝了零假设,即政府强制要求提高对手部卫生的警惕和使用个人防护用品,并在此期间得到医疗信托机构的响应,将减少感染的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信