Confronting Horror: Emily Hobhouse and the Concentration Camp Photographs of the South African War

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Kronos Pub Date : 2006-11-01 DOI:10.4324/9780203095331-21
M. Godby
{"title":"Confronting Horror: Emily Hobhouse and the Concentration Camp Photographs of the South African War","authors":"M. Godby","doi":"10.4324/9780203095331-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2003 the War Museum of the Boer Republics in Bloemfontein published a selection of photographs from its holdings on the South African War of 1899-1902 under the title Suffering oj War. 2 Although most of the images depict the suffering of Boer subjects in the unequal war between Great Britain and the Boer States of the South African Republic (subsequently, the Transvaal) and the Orange Free State (Rebpublic), the text of the book reads as a condemnation of war in general. In this sense, Suffering oj War fonns the latest chapter in the evolution of the war in South African political consciousness that Albert Grundlingh has traced over the past century.3 Grundlingh shows that, despite the trauma of the war and its obvious resonance in historical memory, only nine books on it were published before 1931. As the tide of Afrikaner Nationalism rose in the 1930s and 1940s, however, many books were written to celebrate the exploits of Boer commandos and generals, on the one hand, and condemn the British treatment of the civilian population, on the other. Subsequently, as the victorious Nationalist movement sought to rally English-speaking support against a presumed common Black enemy, little attention was paid to the War as a defining moment in Mrikaner history. The occasion of the centenary of the War in the new dispensation of a liberated South Africa, however, has encouraged scholars to examine the War as it affected the entire population of the subcontinent for which reason it is now generally referred to as the South African War rather than its traditional name of the AngloBoer War. However, if these changes in historical perspective have allowed the history of the War to be examined with increasing critical rigour, it has to be said that the same is not true of the photographs of the War, especially the photographs of concentration camp victims. Like other historical photographs, pictures of the South African War are routinely reproduced in altered fonnat, with incomplete or altered caption information, and no apparent concern for their authorship, original circulation, or function. Moreover, the concentration camp photographs in particular have been made to work as propaganda, which, almost by definition, purposefully excludes the possibility of a critical reading of the images.","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095331-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In 2003 the War Museum of the Boer Republics in Bloemfontein published a selection of photographs from its holdings on the South African War of 1899-1902 under the title Suffering oj War. 2 Although most of the images depict the suffering of Boer subjects in the unequal war between Great Britain and the Boer States of the South African Republic (subsequently, the Transvaal) and the Orange Free State (Rebpublic), the text of the book reads as a condemnation of war in general. In this sense, Suffering oj War fonns the latest chapter in the evolution of the war in South African political consciousness that Albert Grundlingh has traced over the past century.3 Grundlingh shows that, despite the trauma of the war and its obvious resonance in historical memory, only nine books on it were published before 1931. As the tide of Afrikaner Nationalism rose in the 1930s and 1940s, however, many books were written to celebrate the exploits of Boer commandos and generals, on the one hand, and condemn the British treatment of the civilian population, on the other. Subsequently, as the victorious Nationalist movement sought to rally English-speaking support against a presumed common Black enemy, little attention was paid to the War as a defining moment in Mrikaner history. The occasion of the centenary of the War in the new dispensation of a liberated South Africa, however, has encouraged scholars to examine the War as it affected the entire population of the subcontinent for which reason it is now generally referred to as the South African War rather than its traditional name of the AngloBoer War. However, if these changes in historical perspective have allowed the history of the War to be examined with increasing critical rigour, it has to be said that the same is not true of the photographs of the War, especially the photographs of concentration camp victims. Like other historical photographs, pictures of the South African War are routinely reproduced in altered fonnat, with incomplete or altered caption information, and no apparent concern for their authorship, original circulation, or function. Moreover, the concentration camp photographs in particular have been made to work as propaganda, which, almost by definition, purposefully excludes the possibility of a critical reading of the images.
《直面恐怖:艾米莉·霍布豪斯与南非战争中的集中营照片》
2003年布尔共和国的战争博物馆在布隆方丹发表的照片从其持有南非战争1899 - 1902年的标题下痛苦oj战争。2尽管大多数的图像描绘了痛苦的布尔对象之间的不平等的战争英国和南非共和国的布尔州(随后,德兰士瓦)和奥兰治自由邦(Rebpublic),书读的文本作为一个对战争的谴责。从这个意义上说,《战争的苦难》开启了阿尔伯特·格伦德林在过去一个世纪中所追溯的南非政治意识中战争演变的最新篇章格伦德林指出,尽管战争带来了创伤,而且在历史记忆中产生了明显的共鸣,但在1931年之前,有关战争的书籍只出版了9本。然而,随着20世纪30年代和40年代阿非利卡民族主义浪潮的兴起,许多书籍一方面颂扬布尔突击队和将军的功绩,另一方面谴责英国对待平民的方式。随后,由于胜利的民族主义运动试图团结英语国家的支持,反对一个假定的共同黑人敌人,很少有人注意到这场战争是姆里卡内尔历史上的一个决定性时刻。然而,解放后的南非迎来了这场战争的百年纪念,这鼓励了学者们对这场战争进行研究,因为它影响了整个次大陆的人口,因此它现在通常被称为南非战争,而不是传统的英布战争。然而,如果历史观点的这些变化使人们能够越来越严格地审查战争的历史,那么必须说,战争的照片,特别是集中营受害者的照片并非如此。像其他历史照片一样,南非战争的照片通常以改变的字体复制,带有不完整或更改的标题信息,并且没有明显的关注其作者,原始流通或功能。此外,集中营的照片尤其被用作宣传,几乎从定义上讲,这就有意排除了对这些图像进行批判性解读的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信