Airport security system standards development: Challenges and outcomes

C. Wilkinson, Art Kosatka
{"title":"Airport security system standards development: Challenges and outcomes","authors":"C. Wilkinson, Art Kosatka","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2016.7815716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of security systems at airports within the United States - indeed, worldwide - has grown significantly over the years in response to increasing threats and regulatory developments. Initially, each airport developed its own security system without recourse to unified standards. The result was a mixed bag of proprietary systems which were typically over budget, poorly integrated, did not fully meet security requirements, and were both difficult and expensive to maintain. To address this, in the early 90s the ACC (Airports Consultants Council) chaired an RTCA Federal Advisory Committee to develop performance standards for staff access control systems to permit access to security-related areas of an airport. This was followed several years later by TSA's technical guidelines for checked baggage and passenger screening systems. Tying these together, a comprehensive document known within the industry as “The Guidelines”, (The full title is: “Recommended Security Guidelines for Airport Planning, Design and Construction “) was commissioned by TSA in 2006 to replace an earlier 2001 FAA version. This was updated in 2011, and a revision is currently underway for a 4th iteration. The RTCA access control standards are currently in their 7th iteration and the checkpoint and baggage guidelines in their 5th and 6th iteration respectively: demonstrating the need to update such standards regularly, as technology and regulatory requirements change to meet the changing threat. The RTCA access control standard is a substantial document, totaling over 300 pages. The checked baggage guidelines are over 500 pages; the checkpoint guidelines are over 150 pages. Together with “The Guidelines” they comprise a comprehensive set of airport security guidance, frequently referenced throughout the world. This paper reviews how the content of each of these standards was developed: how the developmental activity was funded: how participation by airport professionals contributed, and how the various documents continue to be coordinated. It addresses the issue of uneven technology development cycles and requirements, both within each document and between documents, and how to handle these changes without developing “silos”, as well as providing details of how these challenges were addressed in the access control system standards and the Guidelines.","PeriodicalId":6510,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2016.7815716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity of security systems at airports within the United States - indeed, worldwide - has grown significantly over the years in response to increasing threats and regulatory developments. Initially, each airport developed its own security system without recourse to unified standards. The result was a mixed bag of proprietary systems which were typically over budget, poorly integrated, did not fully meet security requirements, and were both difficult and expensive to maintain. To address this, in the early 90s the ACC (Airports Consultants Council) chaired an RTCA Federal Advisory Committee to develop performance standards for staff access control systems to permit access to security-related areas of an airport. This was followed several years later by TSA's technical guidelines for checked baggage and passenger screening systems. Tying these together, a comprehensive document known within the industry as “The Guidelines”, (The full title is: “Recommended Security Guidelines for Airport Planning, Design and Construction “) was commissioned by TSA in 2006 to replace an earlier 2001 FAA version. This was updated in 2011, and a revision is currently underway for a 4th iteration. The RTCA access control standards are currently in their 7th iteration and the checkpoint and baggage guidelines in their 5th and 6th iteration respectively: demonstrating the need to update such standards regularly, as technology and regulatory requirements change to meet the changing threat. The RTCA access control standard is a substantial document, totaling over 300 pages. The checked baggage guidelines are over 500 pages; the checkpoint guidelines are over 150 pages. Together with “The Guidelines” they comprise a comprehensive set of airport security guidance, frequently referenced throughout the world. This paper reviews how the content of each of these standards was developed: how the developmental activity was funded: how participation by airport professionals contributed, and how the various documents continue to be coordinated. It addresses the issue of uneven technology development cycles and requirements, both within each document and between documents, and how to handle these changes without developing “silos”, as well as providing details of how these challenges were addressed in the access control system standards and the Guidelines.
机场安全系统标准发展:挑战与成果
多年来,为了应对日益增加的威胁和监管方面的发展,美国——实际上是全世界——机场安全系统的复杂性显著增加。最初,每个机场都开发了自己的安全系统,没有统一的标准。结果是一个混合的专有系统,这些系统通常超出预算,集成不良,不能完全满足安全需求,并且维护起来既困难又昂贵。为了解决这个问题,在90年代初,ACC(机场顾问委员会)主持了一个RTCA联邦咨询委员会,以制定工作人员进入控制系统的性能标准,以允许进入机场与安全有关的区域。几年后,美国运输安全管理局制定了托运行李和乘客安检系统的技术指南。将这些结合在一起,TSA于2006年委托编写了一份全面的文件,业内称为“指南”(全称是:“机场规划、设计和建设安全指南推荐”),以取代2001年FAA的版本。该版本于2011年更新,目前正在进行第4次迭代的修订。RTCA访问控制标准目前处于第7次迭代,检查点和行李指南分别处于第5次和第6次迭代:随着技术和监管要求的变化,以满足不断变化的威胁,需要定期更新这些标准。RTCA访问控制标准是一个重要的文件,总共超过300页。托运行李指南超过500页;检查点指南有150多页。它们连同“指引”组成了一套全面的机场保安指引,在世界各地经常被引用。本文回顾了每一项标准的内容是如何制定的;发展活动是如何获得资助的;机场专业人员的参与是如何作出贡献的;以及各种文件是如何继续协调的。它解决了每个文件内部和文件之间技术开发周期和需求不均衡的问题,以及如何在不形成“孤岛”的情况下处理这些变化,并提供了如何在访问控制系统标准和指南中解决这些挑战的详细信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信