Numerical simulation of rock bursts

W. Müller
{"title":"Numerical simulation of rock bursts","authors":"W. Müller","doi":"10.1016/0167-9031(91)91513-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mathematical description of dynamic fracture processes, in particular of rock bursts in hardcoal mining, can be advanced by the use of dynamic iterative methods. From a comparison of two different numerical approaches the dynamic finite difference method as used in the FLAC program turned out to be the most suitable. For proper calculation of rock bursts one has to consider, besides a shear break criterion, the simulation of the triaxial, post-failure mechanisms of coal and rock strata as well as the behaviour of contact planes between coal and rock strata.</p><p>The results of laboratory drilling tests on triaxial loaded coal samples have been used for this. To understand the genesis of rock bursts lateral inhomogenities either in the seam or at the interface must be taken into consideration as well. If all of these parameters are not included in the model no dynamic fracture processes similar to rock bursts will occur. This also explains the unpredictable nature of rock bursts a rock burst will not necessarily occur when specific relationships between area being worked, geometry, stress and strength exist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100929,"journal":{"name":"Mining Science and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 27-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-9031(91)91513-H","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016790319191513H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

The mathematical description of dynamic fracture processes, in particular of rock bursts in hardcoal mining, can be advanced by the use of dynamic iterative methods. From a comparison of two different numerical approaches the dynamic finite difference method as used in the FLAC program turned out to be the most suitable. For proper calculation of rock bursts one has to consider, besides a shear break criterion, the simulation of the triaxial, post-failure mechanisms of coal and rock strata as well as the behaviour of contact planes between coal and rock strata.

The results of laboratory drilling tests on triaxial loaded coal samples have been used for this. To understand the genesis of rock bursts lateral inhomogenities either in the seam or at the interface must be taken into consideration as well. If all of these parameters are not included in the model no dynamic fracture processes similar to rock bursts will occur. This also explains the unpredictable nature of rock bursts a rock burst will not necessarily occur when specific relationships between area being worked, geometry, stress and strength exist.

岩爆的数值模拟
利用动态迭代方法,可以对动态断裂过程,特别是对硬煤开采中冲击地压的动态断裂过程进行数学描述。通过对两种不同数值方法的比较,表明FLAC程序中采用的动态有限差分法是最合适的。为了正确地计算冲击地压,除了考虑剪切破坏准则外,还必须考虑煤与岩层破坏后三轴机制的模拟以及煤与岩层之间接触面的行为。本文采用了三轴载荷煤样室内钻孔试验的结果。为了了解岩爆的成因,还必须考虑煤层或界面处的侧向不均匀性。如果模型中不包括这些参数,则不会发生类似岩爆的动态破裂过程。这也解释了岩爆的不可预测性,当工作区域、几何形状、应力和强度之间存在特定关系时,岩爆不一定会发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信