Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
S. Akhil, Prakriti Chourasia, Sandeep Kumar
{"title":"Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients","authors":"S. Akhil, Prakriti Chourasia, Sandeep Kumar","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/60329.17319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A thinner Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) is an important criterion in determining the probability of progression from Ocular Hypertension (OHT) to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG). The most common devices for measuring CCT are ultrasound and optical pachymeters. Ultrasound pachymetry is a quick and precise approach to quantify corneal thickness that is also portable and inexpensive. The advantages of optical method include operator independency and noninvasiveness. Aim: To compare central corneal thickness using optical and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with POAG. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department Ophthalmology, ESI Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Basaidarapur, Delhi, India, from October 2020 to April 2022. There were 105 POAG patients (210 eyes), divided into three subgroups of 35 subjects each (70 eyes each), based on the number of anti-glaucoma medications being instilled, topically (one/two/three drugs), and 35 healthy antiglaucoma controls (70 eyes). Central corneal thickness measurements were taken by Ultrasonic Pachymeter (USP) TOMEY SP-100, and by CEM-530 Non Contact Specular Microscope (NCSM) (optical). Statistical analysis was performed by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Results: The mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 540.83±35.51 µm and 538.74±36.22 µm, respectively, in Right Eyes (RE) of 35 glaucoma patients on one drug, (p-value=0.80). Similarly, Left Eyes (LE), mean CCT with NCSM was 544.17±33.98 µm, and with USP was 541.69±36.6 µm (p-value=0.76). Mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 539.83±30,85 µm and 537.66±30.5 µm, respectively in RT eyes of 35 glaucoma patients on two drugs (p-value=0.76). Left eyes, mean CCT was 541.91±29.79 µm with NCSM as compared to USP which was 540.11±29.89 µm (p-value=0.80). On comparing the mean CCT values of RE in glaucoma subjects who were controlled on three antiglaucoma drugs it was found to be 528.37±26.44 µm using NCSM and 527.09±26.17 µm using USP (p-value=0.84). The meanvalues of CCT for LE was 521.94±26.53 µm with NCSM and with USP was 520±26.52 µm, respectively (p-value=0.81). Comparison of mean CCT measurements using NCSM and USP in 35 age-matched controls RE eye was found to be 517.83±21.27 µm and 515.97±20.91 µm, respectively (p-value=0.71). Similarly, for LE mean CCT values were 518.8±24.21 µm and 516.8±24.37 µm, respectively (p-value=0.73). Conclusion: The CCT measured using NCSM was found to be higher than that measured using USP in POAG subgroups patients as well as healthy age-matched controls, however the difference was not statistically significant. There was highly significant linear correlation between the CCT measured using NCSM and USP in all POAG subgroups as well as healthy controls. This suggests that the devices could be used interchangeably in glaucoma patients as well as healthy subjects of similar age group.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/60329.17319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A thinner Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) is an important criterion in determining the probability of progression from Ocular Hypertension (OHT) to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG). The most common devices for measuring CCT are ultrasound and optical pachymeters. Ultrasound pachymetry is a quick and precise approach to quantify corneal thickness that is also portable and inexpensive. The advantages of optical method include operator independency and noninvasiveness. Aim: To compare central corneal thickness using optical and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with POAG. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department Ophthalmology, ESI Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Basaidarapur, Delhi, India, from October 2020 to April 2022. There were 105 POAG patients (210 eyes), divided into three subgroups of 35 subjects each (70 eyes each), based on the number of anti-glaucoma medications being instilled, topically (one/two/three drugs), and 35 healthy antiglaucoma controls (70 eyes). Central corneal thickness measurements were taken by Ultrasonic Pachymeter (USP) TOMEY SP-100, and by CEM-530 Non Contact Specular Microscope (NCSM) (optical). Statistical analysis was performed by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Results: The mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 540.83±35.51 µm and 538.74±36.22 µm, respectively, in Right Eyes (RE) of 35 glaucoma patients on one drug, (p-value=0.80). Similarly, Left Eyes (LE), mean CCT with NCSM was 544.17±33.98 µm, and with USP was 541.69±36.6 µm (p-value=0.76). Mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 539.83±30,85 µm and 537.66±30.5 µm, respectively in RT eyes of 35 glaucoma patients on two drugs (p-value=0.76). Left eyes, mean CCT was 541.91±29.79 µm with NCSM as compared to USP which was 540.11±29.89 µm (p-value=0.80). On comparing the mean CCT values of RE in glaucoma subjects who were controlled on three antiglaucoma drugs it was found to be 528.37±26.44 µm using NCSM and 527.09±26.17 µm using USP (p-value=0.84). The meanvalues of CCT for LE was 521.94±26.53 µm with NCSM and with USP was 520±26.52 µm, respectively (p-value=0.81). Comparison of mean CCT measurements using NCSM and USP in 35 age-matched controls RE eye was found to be 517.83±21.27 µm and 515.97±20.91 µm, respectively (p-value=0.71). Similarly, for LE mean CCT values were 518.8±24.21 µm and 516.8±24.37 µm, respectively (p-value=0.73). Conclusion: The CCT measured using NCSM was found to be higher than that measured using USP in POAG subgroups patients as well as healthy age-matched controls, however the difference was not statistically significant. There was highly significant linear correlation between the CCT measured using NCSM and USP in all POAG subgroups as well as healthy controls. This suggests that the devices could be used interchangeably in glaucoma patients as well as healthy subjects of similar age group.
光学和超声测厚法测量原发性开角型青光眼患者角膜中央厚度的比较
中心角膜厚度(CCT)较薄是判断高眼压(OHT)发展为原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)可能性的重要标准。测量CCT最常用的设备是超声和光学测厚仪。超声测厚法是一种快速而精确的量化角膜厚度的方法,也是便携式和廉价的。光学方法具有操作员独立性和非侵入性等优点。目的:比较POAG患者角膜中央厚度的光学和超声测量。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2020年10月至2022年4月在印度德里Basaidarapur ESI医学科学与研究所眼科进行。105例POAG患者(210只眼),根据注射抗青光眼药物的数量分为3个亚组,每组35人(每组70只眼),局部注射(1 / 2 / 3种药物),健康对照35人(70只眼)。采用超声厚计(USP) TOMEY SP-100和CEM-530非接触镜面显微镜(NCSM)(光学)测量角膜中央厚度。统计分析采用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)程序17.0版(SPSS, Chicago, Illinois)进行。结果:35例单药青光眼患者右眼NCSM和USP的平均CCT分别为540.83±35.51µm和538.74±36.22µm, p值=0.80。同样,左眼(LE), NCSM组的平均CCT为544.17±33.98µm, USP组的平均CCT为541.69±36.6µm (p值=0.76)。两种药物治疗的35例青光眼患者,NCSM和USP的平均CCT分别为539.83±30、85µm和537.66±30.5µm (p值=0.76)。左眼NCSM的平均CCT为541.91±29.79µm, USP为540.11±29.89µm (p值=0.80)。比较三种抗青光眼药物控制的青光眼患者RE的平均CCT值,NCSM为528.37±26.44µm, USP为527.09±26.17µm (p值=0.84)。NCSM组和USP组LE的CCT平均值分别为521.94±26.53µm和520±26.52µm (p值=0.81)。NCSM和USP在35只年龄匹配对照RE眼中CCT测量值的平均值分别为517.83±21.27µm和515.97±20.91µm (p值=0.71)。同样,LE的平均CCT值分别为518.8±24.21µm和516.8±24.37µm (p值=0.73)。结论:在POAG亚组患者和年龄匹配的健康对照中,NCSM测量的CCT高于USP测量的CCT,但差异无统计学意义。在所有POAG亚组以及健康对照组中,使用NCSM测量的CCT与USP之间存在高度显著的线性相关。这表明这些设备可以在青光眼患者和相似年龄组的健康受试者中互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信