Gender and evaluation in contemporary American English: A corpus study based on pronominal and nominal expressions with male and female reference

Md Nazmus Saqueb Kathon
{"title":"Gender and evaluation in contemporary American English: A corpus study based on pronominal and nominal expressions with male and female reference","authors":"Md Nazmus Saqueb Kathon","doi":"10.2478/icame-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study of contemporary American English examines how males and females are evaluated in terms of their personality, physical appearance, societal importance, etc. across various registers. In this study, evaluation is defined as an expression of a speaker or writer’s attitude toward, viewpoint on, or feelings about a male or female referent, which generally carries a positive or a negative meaning. The evaluative tokens analyzed in the study include noun phrases (e.g., a real jerk) and adjectival modification (e.g., congenial) co-occurring with gender-specific nominal expressions (e.g., boy, lady) or pronominal expressions (e.g., he, she). The findings imply a distinct gender patterning in the evaluation: whereas males are evaluated in terms of their skills, abilities, acuities and importance in society, females are typically assessed in terms of their looks and appearance. Males occupy considerably more evaluative space than females, particularly in the Newspaper register. The preponderance of the evaluation of males even in twenty-first-century American English is surprising, considering changes in gender role attitudes in U.S. society in recent decades.","PeriodicalId":73271,"journal":{"name":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"39 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2023-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study of contemporary American English examines how males and females are evaluated in terms of their personality, physical appearance, societal importance, etc. across various registers. In this study, evaluation is defined as an expression of a speaker or writer’s attitude toward, viewpoint on, or feelings about a male or female referent, which generally carries a positive or a negative meaning. The evaluative tokens analyzed in the study include noun phrases (e.g., a real jerk) and adjectival modification (e.g., congenial) co-occurring with gender-specific nominal expressions (e.g., boy, lady) or pronominal expressions (e.g., he, she). The findings imply a distinct gender patterning in the evaluation: whereas males are evaluated in terms of their skills, abilities, acuities and importance in society, females are typically assessed in terms of their looks and appearance. Males occupy considerably more evaluative space than females, particularly in the Newspaper register. The preponderance of the evaluation of males even in twenty-first-century American English is surprising, considering changes in gender role attitudes in U.S. society in recent decades.
当代美国英语中的性别与评价:基于男女指称代词和名词性表达的语料库研究
摘要:本研究考察了当代美国英语中男性和女性在个性、外貌、社会重要性等方面的评价。在本研究中,评价被定义为说话者或作者对男性或女性指称物的态度、观点或感受的表达,通常带有积极或消极的意义。在研究中分析的评价符号包括名词短语(例如,一个真正的混蛋)和形容词修饰(例如,相投的)与特定性别的名义表达(例如,男孩,女士)或代词表达(例如,他,她)同时出现。研究结果表明,在评估中存在明显的性别模式:男性的评估标准是他们的技能、能力、敏锐度和在社会中的重要性,而女性的评估标准则是她们的长相和外表。男性比女性占据了更多的评价空间,特别是在报纸注册中。考虑到近几十年来美国社会性别角色态度的变化,即使在21世纪的美式英语中,对男性的评价也占主导地位,这令人惊讶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信