An information theoretic privacy and utility measure for data sanitization mechanisms

Mina Askari, R. Safavi-Naini, K. Barker
{"title":"An information theoretic privacy and utility measure for data sanitization mechanisms","authors":"Mina Askari, R. Safavi-Naini, K. Barker","doi":"10.1145/2133601.2133637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data collection agencies publish sensitive data for legitimate purposes, such as research, marketing and etc. Data publishing has attracted much interest in research community due to the important concerns over the protection of individuals privacy. As a result several sanitization mechanisms with different notions of privacy have been proposed. To be able to measure, set and compare the level of privacy protection, there is a need to translate these different mechanisms to a unified system. In this paper, we propose a novel information theoretic framework for representing a formal model of a mechanism as a noisy channel and evaluating its privacy and utility. We show that deterministic publishing property that is used in most of these mechanisms reduces the privacy guarantees and causes information to leak. The great effect of adversary's background knowledge on this metric is concluded. We also show that using this framework we can compute the sanitization mechanism's preserved utility from the point of view of a data user. By using the specifications of a popular sanitization mechanism, k-anonymity, we analytically provide a representation of this mechanism to be used for its evaluation.","PeriodicalId":90472,"journal":{"name":"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy","volume":"32 1","pages":"283-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2133601.2133637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Data collection agencies publish sensitive data for legitimate purposes, such as research, marketing and etc. Data publishing has attracted much interest in research community due to the important concerns over the protection of individuals privacy. As a result several sanitization mechanisms with different notions of privacy have been proposed. To be able to measure, set and compare the level of privacy protection, there is a need to translate these different mechanisms to a unified system. In this paper, we propose a novel information theoretic framework for representing a formal model of a mechanism as a noisy channel and evaluating its privacy and utility. We show that deterministic publishing property that is used in most of these mechanisms reduces the privacy guarantees and causes information to leak. The great effect of adversary's background knowledge on this metric is concluded. We also show that using this framework we can compute the sanitization mechanism's preserved utility from the point of view of a data user. By using the specifications of a popular sanitization mechanism, k-anonymity, we analytically provide a representation of this mechanism to be used for its evaluation.
一种数据清理机制的信息理论、隐私和实用措施
数据收集机构出于合法目的发布敏感数据,例如研究、营销等。由于对个人隐私保护的重要关注,数据发布引起了研究界的极大兴趣。因此,提出了几种具有不同隐私概念的消毒机制。为了能够衡量、设置和比较隐私保护的水平,有必要将这些不同的机制转化为一个统一的系统。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的信息理论框架,用于将机制的形式化模型表示为噪声通道,并评估其隐私性和实用性。我们表明,在大多数这些机制中使用的确定性发布属性降低了隐私保证并导致信息泄漏。得出对手的背景知识对这一指标的影响很大。我们还展示了使用这个框架,我们可以从数据用户的角度计算清理机制的保留效用。通过使用一种流行的消毒机制的规范,k-匿名,我们分析地提供了用于其评估的该机制的表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信