{"title":"Survival in the New Corporatized Academy: Resisting the Privatization of Higher Education","authors":"E. Boesenberg","doi":"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I25.185914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid and profound changes are occurring in higher education that we ignore at our peril. Struggling against shifts toward privatization, Dr. Robert Price, a professor at City College of San Francisco, described the changes proposed for his campus as a tsunami (Nichol, 2013) and Jack Hassard cautioned lest the “slow creep of privatization does not turn into an avalanche” (Hassard, 2012). These are apt descriptions for the formidable changes that are poised to sweep away everything in their path, with immediate and devastating consequences for educators, students, and the institutions they attend. The curriculum is also affected and this in turn determines what knowledge is most valued. These transformations have a tremendous influence on how we as a society understand, value, and put education to use, as well as how we as educators practice our profession, generate, and use knowledge. These disastrous changes have not come without warning however. They are reflective of the neoliberal project and have the potential for far-reaching, negative social, political, and economic outcomes. Integral to neoliberalism is a belief that the market has the best answer for a range of social concerns and that it is most capable of delivering results for a variety of social functions, among them education. Acknowledging and understanding these changes can aid in the struggle to resist the effects of the privatization of higher education.","PeriodicalId":42624,"journal":{"name":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I25.185914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Rapid and profound changes are occurring in higher education that we ignore at our peril. Struggling against shifts toward privatization, Dr. Robert Price, a professor at City College of San Francisco, described the changes proposed for his campus as a tsunami (Nichol, 2013) and Jack Hassard cautioned lest the “slow creep of privatization does not turn into an avalanche” (Hassard, 2012). These are apt descriptions for the formidable changes that are poised to sweep away everything in their path, with immediate and devastating consequences for educators, students, and the institutions they attend. The curriculum is also affected and this in turn determines what knowledge is most valued. These transformations have a tremendous influence on how we as a society understand, value, and put education to use, as well as how we as educators practice our profession, generate, and use knowledge. These disastrous changes have not come without warning however. They are reflective of the neoliberal project and have the potential for far-reaching, negative social, political, and economic outcomes. Integral to neoliberalism is a belief that the market has the best answer for a range of social concerns and that it is most capable of delivering results for a variety of social functions, among them education. Acknowledging and understanding these changes can aid in the struggle to resist the effects of the privatization of higher education.
高等教育正在发生迅速而深刻的变化,而我们忽视了这些变化,后果自负。旧金山城市学院(City College of San Francisco)的教授罗伯特·普莱斯博士(Dr. Robert Price)反对私有化的转变,他把为他的校园提出的变化描述为海啸(Nichol, 2013),杰克·哈萨德(Jack Hassard)警告说,“私有化的缓慢蔓延不会变成雪崩”(Hassard, 2012)。这些都是对势不可挡的变化的恰当描述,这些变化将席卷他们前进道路上的一切,给教育者、学生和他们就读的机构带来直接的、毁灭性的后果。课程也受到影响,这反过来又决定了哪些知识是最受重视的。这些转变对我们作为一个社会如何理解、重视和运用教育,以及我们作为教育工作者如何实践我们的职业、产生和使用知识产生了巨大的影响。然而,这些灾难性的变化并非毫无征兆地到来。它们反映了新自由主义计划,并有可能产生深远的、负面的社会、政治和经济结果。新自由主义不可或缺的一个信念是,市场对一系列社会问题有最佳答案,它最有能力为各种社会功能提供结果,其中包括教育。承认和理解这些变化有助于抵抗高等教育私有化的影响。