Direct oral anticoagulants and low-molecular weight heparin for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Anna Francesca Mulles, Amraphel Nicolas, H. H. Chiu, R. E. Villalobos
{"title":"Direct oral anticoagulants and low-molecular weight heparin for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a meta-analysis","authors":"Anna Francesca Mulles, Amraphel Nicolas, H. H. Chiu, R. E. Villalobos","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a6045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication among cancer patients necessitating hospitalization. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for prevention of VTE. Recent studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the prevention of VTE among cancer patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy of DOACs and LMWH in primary prevention of VTE among cancer patients, and evaluate the risks of bleeding. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials evaluating LMWH and DOACs versus placebo as primary prevention for VTE among cancer patients. The primary outcomes were VTE events and incidence of major and minor bleeding. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results were calculated via RevMan Version 5.3 using fixed-effect modelling. Results: Seven randomized trials (two on DOACs; five on LMWHs) with 7073 patients were included. Both DOACs [RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38, 0.84, p = 0.004] and LMWH [RR 0.49; CI 95% 0.36, 0.65, p Conclusion: Both DOACs and LMWH are effective in the prevention of VTE among cancer patients without an increase in risk for major bleeding. Compared to LMWH, DOAC may be associated with decreased risk of major bleeding.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a6045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication among cancer patients necessitating hospitalization. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for prevention of VTE. Recent studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the prevention of VTE among cancer patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy of DOACs and LMWH in primary prevention of VTE among cancer patients, and evaluate the risks of bleeding. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials evaluating LMWH and DOACs versus placebo as primary prevention for VTE among cancer patients. The primary outcomes were VTE events and incidence of major and minor bleeding. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results were calculated via RevMan Version 5.3 using fixed-effect modelling. Results: Seven randomized trials (two on DOACs; five on LMWHs) with 7073 patients were included. Both DOACs [RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38, 0.84, p = 0.004] and LMWH [RR 0.49; CI 95% 0.36, 0.65, p Conclusion: Both DOACs and LMWH are effective in the prevention of VTE among cancer patients without an increase in risk for major bleeding. Compared to LMWH, DOAC may be associated with decreased risk of major bleeding.
直接口服抗凝剂和低分子肝素用于癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞的一级预防:一项荟萃分析
背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是癌症患者中一种严重的并发症,需要住院治疗。目前的指南推荐使用低分子肝素(LMWH)抗凝来预防静脉血栓栓塞。最近的研究也证明了直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在预防癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)方面的疗效。我们的目的是评估DOACs和低分子肝素在癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞一级预防中的疗效,并评估出血风险。方法:在电子数据库中检索评估低分子肝素和DOACs与安慰剂作为癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞一级预防的随机试验。主要结局是静脉血栓栓塞事件和大出血和小出血的发生率。使用Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册对研究进行评估。结果通过RevMan Version 5.3使用固定效应建模计算。结果:7项随机试验(2项针对DOACs;5例LMWHs),共7073例患者。两个DOACs [RR 0.57;95% CI 0.38, 0.84, p = 0.004]和低分子肝素[RR 0.49;结论:DOACs和低分子肝素均可有效预防肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞,且未增加大出血风险。与低分子肝素相比,DOAC可能与大出血风险降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信