Gynecologic Oncologist Views Influencing Referral to Outpatient Specialty Palliative Care.

Casey M Hay, Carolyn Lefkowits, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Marie A Bakitas, Leslie H Clark, Linda R Duska, Renata R Urban, Lee-May Chen, Stephanie L Creasy, Yael Schenker
{"title":"Gynecologic Oncologist Views Influencing Referral to Outpatient Specialty Palliative Care.","authors":"Casey M Hay, Carolyn Lefkowits, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Marie A Bakitas, Leslie H Clark, Linda R Duska, Renata R Urban, Lee-May Chen, Stephanie L Creasy, Yael Schenker","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early specialty palliative care is underused for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. We sought to understand how gynecologic oncologists' views influence outpatient specialty palliative care referral to help inform strategies for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>We conducted a qualitative interview study at 6 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers with well-established outpatient palliative care services. Between September 2015 and March 2016, 34 gynecologic oncologists participated in semistructured telephone interviews focused on attitudes, experiences, and preferences related to outpatient specialty palliative care. A multidisciplinary team analyzed transcripts using constant comparative methods to inductively develop a coding framework. Through an iterative, analytic process, codes were classified, grouped, and refined into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) participant age was 47 (10) years. Mean (SD) interview length was 25 (7) minutes. Three main themes emerged regarding how gynecologic oncologists view outpatient specialty palliative care: (1) long-term relationships with patients is a unique and defining aspect of gynecologic oncology that influences referral, (2) gynecologic oncologists value palliative care clinicians' communication skills and third-party perspective to increase prognostic awareness and help negotiate differences between patient preferences and physician recommendation, and (3) gynecologic oncologists prefer specialty palliative care services embedded within gynecologic oncology clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gynecologic oncologists value longitudinal relationships with patients and use specialty palliative care to negotiate conflict surrounding prognostic awareness or the treatment plan. Embedding specialty palliative care within gynecologic oncology clinics may promote communication between clinicians and facilitate gynecologic oncologist involvement throughout the illness course.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"28 1","pages":"588-596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Early specialty palliative care is underused for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. We sought to understand how gynecologic oncologists' views influence outpatient specialty palliative care referral to help inform strategies for improvement.

Methods/materials: We conducted a qualitative interview study at 6 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers with well-established outpatient palliative care services. Between September 2015 and March 2016, 34 gynecologic oncologists participated in semistructured telephone interviews focused on attitudes, experiences, and preferences related to outpatient specialty palliative care. A multidisciplinary team analyzed transcripts using constant comparative methods to inductively develop a coding framework. Through an iterative, analytic process, codes were classified, grouped, and refined into themes.

Results: Mean (SD) participant age was 47 (10) years. Mean (SD) interview length was 25 (7) minutes. Three main themes emerged regarding how gynecologic oncologists view outpatient specialty palliative care: (1) long-term relationships with patients is a unique and defining aspect of gynecologic oncology that influences referral, (2) gynecologic oncologists value palliative care clinicians' communication skills and third-party perspective to increase prognostic awareness and help negotiate differences between patient preferences and physician recommendation, and (3) gynecologic oncologists prefer specialty palliative care services embedded within gynecologic oncology clinics.

Conclusions: Gynecologic oncologists value longitudinal relationships with patients and use specialty palliative care to negotiate conflict surrounding prognostic awareness or the treatment plan. Embedding specialty palliative care within gynecologic oncology clinics may promote communication between clinicians and facilitate gynecologic oncologist involvement throughout the illness course.

妇科肿瘤学家的观点影响转诊门诊专科姑息治疗。
目的:晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者早期专科姑息治疗应用不足。我们试图了解妇科肿瘤学家的观点如何影响门诊专科姑息治疗转诊,以帮助制定改善策略。方法/材料:我们在6个国家癌症研究所指定的具有完善的门诊姑息治疗服务的癌症中心进行了定性访谈研究。2015年9月至2016年3月,34名妇科肿瘤科医生参加了半结构化的电话访谈,重点是对门诊专科姑息治疗的态度、经历和偏好。一个多学科团队分析转录使用恒定的比较方法归纳开发一个编码框架。通过反复的分析过程,代码被分类、分组,并细化为主题。结果:参与者平均(SD)年龄为47(10)岁。平均(SD)访谈时间为25(7)分钟。关于妇科肿瘤学家如何看待门诊专科姑息治疗,出现了三个主要主题:(1)与患者的长期关系是妇科肿瘤的一个独特和决定性的方面,影响转诊;(2)妇科肿瘤学家重视姑息治疗临床医生的沟通技巧和第三方观点,以提高预后意识,并帮助协商患者偏好和医生建议之间的差异;(3)妇科肿瘤学家更喜欢妇科肿瘤诊所内嵌入的专业姑息治疗服务。结论:妇科肿瘤学家重视与患者的纵向关系,并使用专业姑息治疗来协商围绕预后意识或治疗计划的冲突。在妇科肿瘤诊所中嵌入专业姑息治疗可以促进临床医生之间的交流,并促进妇科肿瘤医生在整个病程中的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书