Maturity Indexing and Postharvest Performance of Newly Developed ‘Lamb Hass’ Avocado Fruit

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 HORTICULTURE
S. Mwelase, A. Mditshwa, Lembe S. Magwaza, S. Tesfay
{"title":"Maturity Indexing and Postharvest Performance of Newly Developed ‘Lamb Hass’ Avocado Fruit","authors":"S. Mwelase, A. Mditshwa, Lembe S. Magwaza, S. Tesfay","doi":"10.1080/15538362.2022.2054906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study was conducted to identify reliable science-based maturity indices for ‘Lamb Hass’ avocado fruit and evaluate the effect of harvest maturity on the fruit postharvest performance. Fruits were harvested from outside and inside canopy positions at early and mid-season for quality assessment. The results showed that the canopy position had a highly significant effect (p < .001) on all maturity parameters: dry matter (DM) content, moisture content (MC) and oil content (OC). The outside canopy fruit were more mature (30% DM, 70% MC, 14.9% OC) than those harvested from the inside canopy (28.9% DM, 71.1% MC, 11.75% OC) at minimum maturity. However, fruit DM and MC did not differ significantly (p > .05) between the early and mid-season fruit, whilst significant differences in OC were found between the two harvesting stages. In both harvesting stages, the canopy positions did not affect the rate of fruit mass loss. Nonetheless, the overall analysis showed that early season fruit had a significantly (p < .001) higher fruit mass loss rate than the mid-season fruit. Notably, fruit maturity did not have a significant effect (p > .05) on the fruit softening rate as insignificant differences between the two harvesting stages were observed. In both the harvesting stages, inside canopy fruit were characterized by a higher concentration of mannoheptulose and perseitol than the outside canopy fruit. The early and mid-season fruit also differed significantly (p < .05) in phenolic content; with the mid-season fruit having a high phenolic content (2.7 µm/g) than the early season fruit (1.8 µm/g), suggesting the possibility of increased mesocarp discolouration with the advancement in maturity. These findings will be a valuable tool to assist growers in assessing fruit readiness for harvest and understanding the influence of maturity on the fruit postharvest behavior.","PeriodicalId":14014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fruit Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fruit Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2022.2054906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study was conducted to identify reliable science-based maturity indices for ‘Lamb Hass’ avocado fruit and evaluate the effect of harvest maturity on the fruit postharvest performance. Fruits were harvested from outside and inside canopy positions at early and mid-season for quality assessment. The results showed that the canopy position had a highly significant effect (p < .001) on all maturity parameters: dry matter (DM) content, moisture content (MC) and oil content (OC). The outside canopy fruit were more mature (30% DM, 70% MC, 14.9% OC) than those harvested from the inside canopy (28.9% DM, 71.1% MC, 11.75% OC) at minimum maturity. However, fruit DM and MC did not differ significantly (p > .05) between the early and mid-season fruit, whilst significant differences in OC were found between the two harvesting stages. In both harvesting stages, the canopy positions did not affect the rate of fruit mass loss. Nonetheless, the overall analysis showed that early season fruit had a significantly (p < .001) higher fruit mass loss rate than the mid-season fruit. Notably, fruit maturity did not have a significant effect (p > .05) on the fruit softening rate as insignificant differences between the two harvesting stages were observed. In both the harvesting stages, inside canopy fruit were characterized by a higher concentration of mannoheptulose and perseitol than the outside canopy fruit. The early and mid-season fruit also differed significantly (p < .05) in phenolic content; with the mid-season fruit having a high phenolic content (2.7 µm/g) than the early season fruit (1.8 µm/g), suggesting the possibility of increased mesocarp discolouration with the advancement in maturity. These findings will be a valuable tool to assist growers in assessing fruit readiness for harvest and understanding the influence of maturity on the fruit postharvest behavior.
新品系“羊哈斯”鳄梨果实成熟度指标及采后性能研究
摘要本研究旨在确定科学可靠的“羔羊哈斯”鳄梨果实成熟度指标,并评价采收成熟度对果实采后性能的影响。果实在季前和季中分别从冠层外和冠层内采摘,进行品质评价。结果表明,冠层位置对各成熟度参数:干物质(DM)含量、水分(MC)含量和油含量(OC)均有极显著影响(p < 0.001)。最小成熟期,冠层外果实(30% DM, 70% MC, 14.9% OC)比冠层内果实(28.9% DM, 71.1% MC, 11.75% OC)更成熟。然而,果实DM和MC在早、中期之间差异不显著(p > 0.05),而OC在两个采收期之间差异显著。在两个收获阶段,冠层位置对果实质量损失率没有影响。尽管如此,整体分析表明,早季水果的果实质量损失率显著高于中季水果(p < 0.001)。值得注意的是,果实成熟度对果实软化率没有显著影响(p > 0.05),两个采收阶段之间差异不显著。在两个收获阶段,冠层内果实的甘露庚糖和海豆糖醇含量均高于冠层外果实。早、中季果实酚类物质含量差异显著(p < 0.05);季中果实的酚含量(2.7µm/g)高于季前果实(1.8µm/g),表明随着成熟的推进,中果皮变色的可能性增加。这些发现将是一个有价值的工具,帮助种植者评估水果的收获准备和了解成熟度对水果采后行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fruit Science
International Journal of Fruit Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fruit Science disseminates results of current research that are immediately applicable to the grower, extension agent, and educator in a useful, legitimate, and scientific format. The focus of the journal is on new technologies and innovative approaches to the management and marketing of all types of fruits. It provides practical and fundamental information necessary for the superior growth and quality of fruit crops. This journal examines fruit growing from a wide range of aspects, including: -genetics and breeding -pruning and training -entomology, plant pathology, and weed science -physiology and cultural practices -marketing and economics -fruit production, harvesting, and postharvest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信