Impact of the corona virus (Covid 19)pandemic on stroke code activities and outcome. A retrospective observational study

S. Jala, C. Bertmar, M. Wronski, S. Day, Joan L. Barr, Ying Hu, E. O’Brien, Miriam Priglinger-Coorey, Iqra Aziz, M. Krause, Rosalind Elliot, M. Fry
{"title":"Impact of the corona virus (Covid 19)pandemic on stroke code activities and outcome. A retrospective observational study","authors":"S. Jala, C. Bertmar, M. Wronski, S. Day, Joan L. Barr, Ying Hu, E. O’Brien, Miriam Priglinger-Coorey, Iqra Aziz, M. Krause, Rosalind Elliot, M. Fry","doi":"10.21307/ajon-2022-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the delivery of healthcare around the world. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital presentations, reperfusion treatment and outcomes in a comprehensive stroke centre. Methods In this observational study seven months of retrospective data from February 2020 (at the beginning of the pandemic) were compared to data collected for the same time frame in 2019. Results There was a transient reduction in stroke presentation only at the beginning of the wave of COVID-19 community transmissions in Sydney. There were significantly more haemorrhagic strokes in the COVID-19 period (n = 66, 15.4 % vs n = 95, 21.5 %, P = 0.02) and baseline stroke severity was higher (NIHSS median 3 vs 4, P = 0.049). Similar proportions of ischaemic stroke patients received reperfusion therapy in the two time periods (IV thrombolysis [n = 51, 17.3% vs n = 52, 17.9%, P = 0.838]; and ECR [n = 38, 12.9% vs n = 46, 15.9%, P = 0.30]). The time from presentation to stroke bed admission was significantly shorter during the COVID-19 period (median 295 vs 260 minutes, P = 0.031). Three-month follow-up Modified Rankin Score was 2 (median) in both periods (P = 0.92). Conclusion There was no change in stroke presentations overall during the 2020 COVID 19 pandemic time period with the exception of the first phase of the pandemic. Baseline stroke severity scores were higher. There was no a difference in the degree of disability at three-month follow-up.","PeriodicalId":32533,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"21 1","pages":"25 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/ajon-2022-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the delivery of healthcare around the world. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital presentations, reperfusion treatment and outcomes in a comprehensive stroke centre. Methods In this observational study seven months of retrospective data from February 2020 (at the beginning of the pandemic) were compared to data collected for the same time frame in 2019. Results There was a transient reduction in stroke presentation only at the beginning of the wave of COVID-19 community transmissions in Sydney. There were significantly more haemorrhagic strokes in the COVID-19 period (n = 66, 15.4 % vs n = 95, 21.5 %, P = 0.02) and baseline stroke severity was higher (NIHSS median 3 vs 4, P = 0.049). Similar proportions of ischaemic stroke patients received reperfusion therapy in the two time periods (IV thrombolysis [n = 51, 17.3% vs n = 52, 17.9%, P = 0.838]; and ECR [n = 38, 12.9% vs n = 46, 15.9%, P = 0.30]). The time from presentation to stroke bed admission was significantly shorter during the COVID-19 period (median 295 vs 260 minutes, P = 0.031). Three-month follow-up Modified Rankin Score was 2 (median) in both periods (P = 0.92). Conclusion There was no change in stroke presentations overall during the 2020 COVID 19 pandemic time period with the exception of the first phase of the pandemic. Baseline stroke severity scores were higher. There was no a difference in the degree of disability at three-month follow-up.
冠状病毒(Covid - 19)大流行对脑卒中代码活动和结果的影响。回顾性观察性研究
背景2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行影响了全球医疗保健的提供。我们评估了COVID-19大流行对医院就诊、再灌注治疗和综合卒中中心预后的影响。方法在这项观察性研究中,将2020年2月(大流行开始时)以来7个月的回顾性数据与2019年同期收集的数据进行比较。结果仅在悉尼COVID-19社区传播浪潮开始时卒中出现短暂减少。在COVID-19期间,出血性卒中发生率显著增加(n = 66, 15.4% vs n = 95, 21.5%, P = 0.02),基线卒中严重程度更高(NIHSS中位数3 vs 4, P = 0.049)。两个时间段内接受再灌注治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者比例相似(静脉溶栓[n = 51, 17.3% vs n = 52, 17.9%, P = 0.838];ECR [n = 38, 12.9% vs n = 46, 15.9%, P = 0.30])。在COVID-19期间,从出现到中风住院的时间显著缩短(中位295分钟vs 260分钟,P = 0.031)。随访3个月,两期修正Rankin评分均为2(中位数)(P = 0.92)。结论在2020年COVID - 19大流行期间,除了大流行的第一阶段外,卒中表现总体上没有变化。基线中风严重程度评分较高。在三个月的随访中,残疾程度没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书