Factors Influencing 4th Year Medical Students Rank Lists of Radiology Residency Programs

Florentino Saenz Rios, Shadan Alwan, Quan D. Nguyen
{"title":"Factors Influencing 4th Year Medical Students Rank Lists of Radiology Residency Programs","authors":"Florentino Saenz Rios, Shadan Alwan, Quan D. Nguyen","doi":"10.1101/2020.06.29.20142968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Applicants for radiology residency programs consider various factors when completing their ranking lists of programs. However, in making their decision, there is usually minimal objective data that can guide applicants in creating their rank list. Purpose: The goal of the study is to determine which factors in order of importance lead to the decision to rank one residency program over the other. Methods: This study was an anonymous, cross sectional study conducted through an online survey. Emails were sent out to applicants who had interviewed at the University of Texas Medical Branch Diagnostic Radiology department the day after match day. The survey consisted of a single open-ended question asking the survey taker to list four factors in order of importance that guided their program rank list. Results were compiled, tallied, and categorized to find common themes between the applicants preferences. Results: Of the 73 surveys sent out, a total of 30 applicants responded for a response rate of 41%. The most common 1st preference factors were Reputation, Location, and Work Environment, with 23.33%, 20%, and 20% of applicants considering these the most important factors in ranking a program. Conclusion: Despite reputation being the most common 1st preference factor, Work Environment was more commonly mentioned overall, being mentioned in 23.35% of all answers compared to Reputation 12.5%. These results, combined with the difficulty in changing a programs location and reputation, make it clear that programs should focus on building and highlighting a healthy work environment to attract applicants.","PeriodicalId":89331,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.29.20142968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Applicants for radiology residency programs consider various factors when completing their ranking lists of programs. However, in making their decision, there is usually minimal objective data that can guide applicants in creating their rank list. Purpose: The goal of the study is to determine which factors in order of importance lead to the decision to rank one residency program over the other. Methods: This study was an anonymous, cross sectional study conducted through an online survey. Emails were sent out to applicants who had interviewed at the University of Texas Medical Branch Diagnostic Radiology department the day after match day. The survey consisted of a single open-ended question asking the survey taker to list four factors in order of importance that guided their program rank list. Results were compiled, tallied, and categorized to find common themes between the applicants preferences. Results: Of the 73 surveys sent out, a total of 30 applicants responded for a response rate of 41%. The most common 1st preference factors were Reputation, Location, and Work Environment, with 23.33%, 20%, and 20% of applicants considering these the most important factors in ranking a program. Conclusion: Despite reputation being the most common 1st preference factor, Work Environment was more commonly mentioned overall, being mentioned in 23.35% of all answers compared to Reputation 12.5%. These results, combined with the difficulty in changing a programs location and reputation, make it clear that programs should focus on building and highlighting a healthy work environment to attract applicants.
影响四年级医学生放射学住院医师项目排名的因素
背景:放射科住院医师项目的申请者在完成项目排名时会考虑各种因素。然而,在做出决定时,通常很少有客观数据可以指导申请人创建他们的排名。目的:本研究的目的是确定哪些因素按重要性排序导致决定将一个住院医师项目排在另一个项目之上。方法:本研究是一项匿名、横断面研究,通过在线调查进行。在比赛日的第二天,德州大学医学分部诊断放射科的面试者就会收到电子邮件。该调查包括一个单一的开放式问题,要求调查对象按照重要性列出四个因素,以指导他们的项目排名。对结果进行汇编、统计和分类,以找到申请人偏好之间的共同主题。结果:在发出的73份调查中,共有30名申请人回应,回复率为41%。最常见的首选因素是声誉、地点和工作环境,分别有23.33%、20%和20%的申请人认为这些因素是对课程排名最重要的因素。结论:尽管声誉是最常见的首选因素,但总体而言,工作环境更常被提及,23.35%的答案提到了工作环境,而声誉则占12.5%。这些结果,再加上改变项目地点和声誉的难度,清楚地表明,项目应该专注于建立和突出一个健康的工作环境,以吸引申请者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信