Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

IF 1.9 4区生物学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY

Journal of Molluscan Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5152/iao.2022.21470

Paul Van de Heyning, Javier Gavilán, Benoît Godey, Rudolf Hagen, Abdulrahman Hagr, Mohan Kameswaran, Yongxin Li, Manikoth Manoj, Robert Mlynski, Martin O'Driscoll, Harold Pillsbury, Christopher H Raine, Gunesh Rajan, Joachim Schmutzhard, Hinrich Staecker

引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe.

Methods: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed.

Results: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent.

Conclusion: Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

世界范围内人工耳蜗候选的差异。

本研究的目的是找出候选资格标准在全球范围内的不同演变。方法分析19家HEARRING诊所采用的候选标准和结果测量方法。结果不同诊所的候选标准不同。总的来说，双侧耳蜗植入和人工耳蜗植入在单侧耳聋患者中越来越常见。结论需要采用标准化的结果测量仪器，为所有听力损失患者提供进入听力世界的途径，使他们从人工耳蜗植入中受益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Molluscan Studies 生物-动物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Molluscan Studies accepts papers on all aspects of the study of molluscs. These include systematics, molecular genetics, palaeontology, ecology, evolution, and physiology. Where the topic is in a specialized field (e.g. parasitology, neurobiology, biochemistry, molecular biology), submissions will still be accepted as long as the mollusc is the principal focus of the study, and not incidental or simply a convenient experimental animal. Papers with a focus on fisheries biology, aquaculture, and control of molluscan pests will be accepted only if they include significant advances in molluscan biology. While systematic papers are encouraged, descriptions of single new taxa will only be considered if they include some ‘added value’, for example in the form of new information on anatomy or distribution, or if they are presented in the context of a systematic revision or phylogenetic analysis of the group.