The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine: Using the Crimean Tatar Question in Foreign Policy after 2014

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Natalia Demeshko, A. Irkhin
{"title":"The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine: Using the Crimean Tatar Question in Foreign Policy after 2014","authors":"Natalia Demeshko, A. Irkhin","doi":"10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-755-770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In historical retrospect, the use of national issues and contradictions has repeatedly become the weakening mechanisms for some great powers in regard to others. In this case, various technologies to construct national myths and ideologies based on tribalism and national exclusiveness and superiority were applied. After the “Crimean spring” in 2014, the Crimean Tatar issue gained a new level of relevance. The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine are actively using the Crimean Tatar factor to oppose the reintegration of Crimea into the Russian Federation and, consequently, to weaken Russia’s positions in the Black Sea and Mediterranean region. In the article the authors analyze the peculiarities of the influence of the Republic of Türkiye on the Crimean Tatars, as well as the Ukrainian initiatives in relation to the Crimean Tatars and joint Turkish-Ukrainian projects, with the target group consisting of the Crimean Tatars. The methodological basis of the research is system-based, geopolitical, civilizational and institutional approaches, which are implemented both directly and by using a number of general scientific and political science methods. The current policy of Türkiye and Ukraine on the Crimean Tatar issue has common features. Firstly, it is currently topical for the policy elites of these states, both at the domestic and international political levels. Under these circumstances, if the Crimean Tatar issue is an opportunity for Kiev to re-establish its jurisdiction over Crimea, then for Ankara the Crimean Tatar population helps to enlist the electoral support, as well as to consider Crimea and the Black Sea region as a Turkish sphere of influence. Secondly, the conditional Turkish-Ukrainian alliance presents itself as a “protector” of the Crimean Tatars from “Russian aggression.” Thirdly, Türkiye and Ukraine are projecting a positive state image by demonstrating protection of interests and observance of the Crimean Tatars rights on the territory of Russia. Fourthly, the actions of Türkiye and Ukraine in terms of the Crimean Tatar can be characterized as a double standard policy. This thesis is confirmed by the national policy of the Republic of Türkiye, and the approaches of Ukraine to the solution of the Crimean Tatar issue before the reunification of Crimea with Russia.","PeriodicalId":55752,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-755-770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In historical retrospect, the use of national issues and contradictions has repeatedly become the weakening mechanisms for some great powers in regard to others. In this case, various technologies to construct national myths and ideologies based on tribalism and national exclusiveness and superiority were applied. After the “Crimean spring” in 2014, the Crimean Tatar issue gained a new level of relevance. The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine are actively using the Crimean Tatar factor to oppose the reintegration of Crimea into the Russian Federation and, consequently, to weaken Russia’s positions in the Black Sea and Mediterranean region. In the article the authors analyze the peculiarities of the influence of the Republic of Türkiye on the Crimean Tatars, as well as the Ukrainian initiatives in relation to the Crimean Tatars and joint Turkish-Ukrainian projects, with the target group consisting of the Crimean Tatars. The methodological basis of the research is system-based, geopolitical, civilizational and institutional approaches, which are implemented both directly and by using a number of general scientific and political science methods. The current policy of Türkiye and Ukraine on the Crimean Tatar issue has common features. Firstly, it is currently topical for the policy elites of these states, both at the domestic and international political levels. Under these circumstances, if the Crimean Tatar issue is an opportunity for Kiev to re-establish its jurisdiction over Crimea, then for Ankara the Crimean Tatar population helps to enlist the electoral support, as well as to consider Crimea and the Black Sea region as a Turkish sphere of influence. Secondly, the conditional Turkish-Ukrainian alliance presents itself as a “protector” of the Crimean Tatars from “Russian aggression.” Thirdly, Türkiye and Ukraine are projecting a positive state image by demonstrating protection of interests and observance of the Crimean Tatars rights on the territory of Russia. Fourthly, the actions of Türkiye and Ukraine in terms of the Crimean Tatar can be characterized as a double standard policy. This thesis is confirmed by the national policy of the Republic of Türkiye, and the approaches of Ukraine to the solution of the Crimean Tatar issue before the reunification of Crimea with Russia.
俄罗斯与乌克兰:2014年后在外交政策中使用克里米亚鞑靼人问题
回顾历史,利用民族问题和民族矛盾一再成为一些大国削弱其他大国的机制。在这种情况下,运用了基于部落主义和民族排他性和优越性的各种技术来建构民族神话和意识形态。2014年“克里米亚之春”之后,克里米亚鞑靼人问题的相关性上升到新的高度。俄罗斯基耶共和国和乌克兰正在积极利用克里米亚鞑靼人因素来反对克里米亚重新并入俄罗斯联邦,从而削弱俄罗斯在黑海和地中海地区的地位。在文章中,作者分析了基耶共和国对克里米亚鞑靼人的影响的特点,以及乌克兰针对克里米亚鞑靼人的倡议和土耳其-乌克兰联合项目,其目标群体是克里米亚鞑靼人。该研究的方法论基础是基于系统的、地缘政治的、文明的和制度的方法,这些方法既可以直接实施,也可以通过使用一些一般的科学和政治学方法来实施。俄罗斯和乌克兰目前在克里米亚鞑靼人问题上的政策具有共同特点。首先,无论是在国内还是在国际政治层面,这都是当前这些国家的政策精英们所关注的话题。在这种情况下,如果克里米亚鞑靼问题是基辅重建其对克里米亚管辖权的机会,那么对安卡拉来说,克里米亚鞑靼人口有助于争取选举支持,并将克里米亚和黑海地区视为土耳其的势力范围。其次,有条件的土耳其-乌克兰联盟将自己呈现为克里米亚鞑靼人免受“俄罗斯侵略”的“保护者”。第三,乌克兰和乌克兰通过在俄罗斯领土上保护克里米亚鞑靼人的利益和尊重他们的权利,树立了积极的国家形象。第四,俄罗斯和乌克兰在克里米亚鞑靼人问题上的行动可以被定性为双重标准政策。在克里米亚并入俄罗斯之前,乌克兰为解决克里米亚鞑靼人问题所采取的措施,以及乌克兰的民族政策,都证实了本文的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Vestnik RUDN International Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信