Efficacy testing of ‘soft’ pesticides for cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae nepalensis Doubleday) in cauliflower at Rampur, Chitwan

H. N. Giri, M. Sharma, R. Thapa, K. R. Pande, B. Khatri
{"title":"Efficacy testing of ‘soft’ pesticides for cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae nepalensis Doubleday) in cauliflower at Rampur, Chitwan","authors":"H. N. Giri, M. Sharma, R. Thapa, K. R. Pande, B. Khatri","doi":"10.3126/jafu.v4i1.47068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae nepalensis) is an important pest of cabbage, cauliflower, and many other crucifers. Pesticide use is a popular method of pest management in small and large-scale vegetable farming in Nepal. These practices are directly linked to human health, biodiversity, and the environment. There are various categories of pesticides available in market, some are toxic, and some are ‘soft’ in nature. Chemical action of pesticides to the insect pest has been recommended by efficacy testing. Accordingly this research was done to evaluate the effectiveness of ‘soft’ chemicals against cabbage butterfly management. Cauliflower cultivar ‘Snow Mystique’ was used for the field experiment established at Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU), Rampur Chitwan during November 2017 to March 2018. Six common pesticides such as Mahashakti (Bt. based), Neemix (Azadirachtin based), Spinosad (bacteria based), Liquid manure (mixture of botanical, cow urine and other ingredients), Superkiller-10 (Cypermethrin based), and control (no use) were used in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), each with four replication. The study findings revealed that the highest number of larval populations of cabbage butterfly as well as damaged plants, leaves, curds, and holes were recorded in control plot, and the lowest larval population and damages were recorded in Cypermethrin and Spinosad treated plots. On the other hand, curd height was significantly higher (13.9 cm) in liquid manure treated plot that was similar with Spinosad treated plots. There was no significant difference in curd diameter (23.1 cm) and biological yield (79.6 t/ha) in Spinosad and Cypermethrin treated plots. It is thus suggested that biological pesticide, such as Spinosad are superior in controlling pests of cauliflower than other tested pesticides. These pesticides along with other soft pesticide are potentially safer for vegetable production. This information is important to develop IPM protocol for cabbage butterfly management in crucifers.","PeriodicalId":15865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jafu.v4i1.47068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae nepalensis) is an important pest of cabbage, cauliflower, and many other crucifers. Pesticide use is a popular method of pest management in small and large-scale vegetable farming in Nepal. These practices are directly linked to human health, biodiversity, and the environment. There are various categories of pesticides available in market, some are toxic, and some are ‘soft’ in nature. Chemical action of pesticides to the insect pest has been recommended by efficacy testing. Accordingly this research was done to evaluate the effectiveness of ‘soft’ chemicals against cabbage butterfly management. Cauliflower cultivar ‘Snow Mystique’ was used for the field experiment established at Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU), Rampur Chitwan during November 2017 to March 2018. Six common pesticides such as Mahashakti (Bt. based), Neemix (Azadirachtin based), Spinosad (bacteria based), Liquid manure (mixture of botanical, cow urine and other ingredients), Superkiller-10 (Cypermethrin based), and control (no use) were used in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), each with four replication. The study findings revealed that the highest number of larval populations of cabbage butterfly as well as damaged plants, leaves, curds, and holes were recorded in control plot, and the lowest larval population and damages were recorded in Cypermethrin and Spinosad treated plots. On the other hand, curd height was significantly higher (13.9 cm) in liquid manure treated plot that was similar with Spinosad treated plots. There was no significant difference in curd diameter (23.1 cm) and biological yield (79.6 t/ha) in Spinosad and Cypermethrin treated plots. It is thus suggested that biological pesticide, such as Spinosad are superior in controlling pests of cauliflower than other tested pesticides. These pesticides along with other soft pesticide are potentially safer for vegetable production. This information is important to develop IPM protocol for cabbage butterfly management in crucifers.
“软”农药对Chitwan Rampur菜花上白菜蝴蝶(Pieris brassicae nepalensis Doubleday)的药效测试
白菜蝴蝶(Pieris brassicae nepalensis)是白菜、花椰菜和许多其他十字花科植物的重要害虫。农药使用是尼泊尔小型和大规模蔬菜种植中流行的有害生物管理方法。这些做法与人类健康、生物多样性和环境直接相关。市面上有各种各样的农药,有些是有毒的,有些是“软”质的。药效试验推荐了农药对害虫的化学作用。因此,本研究是为了评估“软”化学品对白菜蝴蝶管理的有效性。花菜品种“雪魔”于2017年11月至2018年3月在兰普尔奇旺农林大学(AFU)进行了田间试验。随机完全区组设计(RCBD)采用Mahashakti (bt为基础)、Neemix(印楝素为基础)、Spinosad(细菌为基础)、液体肥料(植物、牛尿和其他成分的混合物)、Superkiller-10(氯氰菊酯为基础)和对照(未使用)等6种常见农药,每组4个重复。研究结果表明,对照区白菜蝶幼虫数量和被害植物、叶片、结乳、孔洞数量均最高,氯氰菊酯和思比诺沙处理区白菜蝶幼虫数量和被害数量均最低。另一方面,液肥处理的凝块高度显著高于施比诺沙处理的凝块高度(13.9 cm),与施比诺沙处理的凝块高度相似。氯氰菊酯和Spinosad处理田块凝乳直径(23.1 cm)和生物产量(79.6 t/ hm2)无显著差异。因此,生物农药对花椰菜害虫的防治效果优于其他农药。这些农药和其他软农药对蔬菜生产可能更安全。这些信息对制定十字花科植物白菜蝶管理的IPM方案具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信